Validation crisitunity: A response to Al-Hoorie, Hiver, and In’nami (2024)

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Studies in Second Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1017/s0272263124000597
W. L. Quint Oga-Baldwin
{"title":"Validation crisitunity: A response to Al-Hoorie, Hiver, and In’nami (2024)","authors":"W. L. Quint Oga-Baldwin","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Al-Hoorie et al. (2024: <span>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</span>, 1–23) illuminate a validation crisis within the second language (L2) Motivational Self System (L2MSS), revealing empirical flaws in its current measurement. Their analysis indicates a persistent lack of discriminant validity among the system’s constructs, issuing a fundamental challenge in distinguishing the concepts. These findings, echoing previous concerns, underscore a pressing need for theoretical refinement and methodological rigor within the field, leading the authors to advocate for a temporary halt in L2 self-studies to address these issues comprehensively. This commentary discusses the call for a substantive moratorium presented by Al-Hoorie et al. (2024: <span>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</span>, 1–23) as a necessary step toward resolving persistent challenges in the field. By highlighting historical issues and suggesting pathways for theoretical diversification and methodological advancement, I aim to foster a productive dialogue on motivational psychology in language learning while ensuring empirical robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Al-Hoorie et al. (2024: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–23) illuminate a validation crisis within the second language (L2) Motivational Self System (L2MSS), revealing empirical flaws in its current measurement. Their analysis indicates a persistent lack of discriminant validity among the system’s constructs, issuing a fundamental challenge in distinguishing the concepts. These findings, echoing previous concerns, underscore a pressing need for theoretical refinement and methodological rigor within the field, leading the authors to advocate for a temporary halt in L2 self-studies to address these issues comprehensively. This commentary discusses the call for a substantive moratorium presented by Al-Hoorie et al. (2024: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–23) as a necessary step toward resolving persistent challenges in the field. By highlighting historical issues and suggesting pathways for theoretical diversification and methodological advancement, I aim to foster a productive dialogue on motivational psychology in language learning while ensuring empirical robustness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证危机:对 Al-Hoorie、Hiver 和 In'nami (2024) 的回应
Al-Hoorie 等人(2024:《第二语言习得研究》,1-23)揭示了第二语言(L2)动机自我系统(L2MSS)的验证危机,揭示了其当前测量中的经验缺陷。他们的分析表明,该系统的建构之间一直缺乏判别效度,这给区分概念带来了根本性的挑战。这些发现与之前的担忧如出一辙,强调了该领域迫切需要理论上的完善和方法上的严谨,因此作者主张暂时停止 L2 自我研究,以全面解决这些问题。本评论讨论了 Al-Hoorie 等人(2024:《第二语言习得研究》,1-23)提出的实质性暂停的呼吁,认为这是解决该领域长期存在的挑战的必要步骤。通过强调历史问题并提出理论多样化和方法论进步的途径,我旨在促进语言学习动机心理学方面富有成效的对话,同时确保实证的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Acquisition is a refereed journal of international scope devoted to the scientific discussion of acquisition or use of non-native and heritage languages. Each volume (five issues) contains research articles of either a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods nature in addition to essays on current theoretical matters. Other rubrics include shorter articles such as Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports.
期刊最新文献
Validation crisitunity: A response to Al-Hoorie, Hiver, and In’nami (2024) Do they like me?: Exploring the role of metaperception in L1–L2 speaker interaction Learning without awareness revisited and reconsidered: A conceptual replication and extension Exploring the roles of ideal L2 writing self, growth L2 writing mindset, and L2 writing grit in L2 writing achievement among EFL learners Second language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts: An approximate replication of Van Hell & Dijkstra (2002)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1