What is the level of nutrition care provided to older adults attending emergency departments? A scoping review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05478-0
Cerenay Sarier, Mairéad Conneely, Sheila Bowers, Liz Dore, Rose Galvin, Anne Griffin
{"title":"What is the level of nutrition care provided to older adults attending emergency departments? A scoping review.","authors":"Cerenay Sarier, Mairéad Conneely, Sheila Bowers, Liz Dore, Rose Galvin, Anne Griffin","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05478-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults often experience adverse health outcomes including malnutrition following discharge from emergency departments (ED). Discharge to community care is a transitionary time where nutritional vulnerability could be mitigated with the instigation of targeted nutrition care pathways in ED settings.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to establish and describe the level of nutrition care provided to older adults admitted and subsequently discharged from EDs.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Systematic searches of nine academic and grey literature databases (Medline (Ovid), Pubmed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus), grey literature sources (DART-Europe E-theses portal, Open Grey, and Trip Medical database) and four websites (Google, Google Scholar, NICE and LENUS) for relevant professional and organisational publications of research, policy, practice, and guidelines between January 2011 to 2023 were completed. Eligible studies included a population of older adults (≥ 65 years) with an ED attendance and subsequent community discharge, and where nutrition screening had identified malnutrition. Data were extracted on the level of nutrition and dietetic care initiated for older adults in the ED according to the Nutrition Care Process Model and summarised descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 22 studies were included in the review. Nutrition status was screened on admission to the ED using validated tools: Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (n = 13), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (n = 2), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (n = 2), NRS-2002 (n = 1) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment - Full Form (n = 1). A full nutrition assessment was reported by 5 studies. Only one study referred to documentation of malnutrition in healthcare records. Subsequent nutrition intervention after discharge from the ED for older adults was not described in any study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is evidence to support malnutrition screening is taking place in EDs, there is a lack of information about subsequent nutrition care including assessment and therapy interventions. This points to the need for comprehensive exploration of nutrition care pathways, practice, policy, and research to inform models of integrated care for older persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05478-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults often experience adverse health outcomes including malnutrition following discharge from emergency departments (ED). Discharge to community care is a transitionary time where nutritional vulnerability could be mitigated with the instigation of targeted nutrition care pathways in ED settings.

Aims and objectives: This scoping review aimed to establish and describe the level of nutrition care provided to older adults admitted and subsequently discharged from EDs.

Research design: Systematic searches of nine academic and grey literature databases (Medline (Ovid), Pubmed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus), grey literature sources (DART-Europe E-theses portal, Open Grey, and Trip Medical database) and four websites (Google, Google Scholar, NICE and LENUS) for relevant professional and organisational publications of research, policy, practice, and guidelines between January 2011 to 2023 were completed. Eligible studies included a population of older adults (≥ 65 years) with an ED attendance and subsequent community discharge, and where nutrition screening had identified malnutrition. Data were extracted on the level of nutrition and dietetic care initiated for older adults in the ED according to the Nutrition Care Process Model and summarised descriptively.

Results: Overall, 22 studies were included in the review. Nutrition status was screened on admission to the ED using validated tools: Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (n = 13), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (n = 2), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (n = 2), NRS-2002 (n = 1) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment - Full Form (n = 1). A full nutrition assessment was reported by 5 studies. Only one study referred to documentation of malnutrition in healthcare records. Subsequent nutrition intervention after discharge from the ED for older adults was not described in any study.

Conclusion: While there is evidence to support malnutrition screening is taking place in EDs, there is a lack of information about subsequent nutrition care including assessment and therapy interventions. This points to the need for comprehensive exploration of nutrition care pathways, practice, policy, and research to inform models of integrated care for older persons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科为老年人提供的营养护理水平如何?范围审查。
背景:老年人从急诊科(ED)出院后往往会出现不良健康后果,包括营养不良。从急诊科出院到社区护理是一个过渡时期,在这一时期,通过在急诊科设置有针对性的营养护理路径,可减轻营养方面的脆弱性:本次范围界定综述旨在确定并描述为急诊室收治并随后出院的老年人提供的营养护理水平:研究设计:对九个学术和灰色文献数据库(Medline (Ovid)、Pubmed、CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost)、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 Scopus)、灰色文献来源(DART-Europe E-theses portal、Open Grey 和 Trip Medical 数据库)以及四个网站(Google、Google Scholar、NICE 和 LENUS)进行了系统检索,以了解 2011 年 1 月至 2023 年间相关专业和组织的研究、政策、实践和指南出版物。符合条件的研究包括急诊室就诊和随后出院的老年人(≥ 65 岁),以及营养筛查发现营养不良的人群。研究人员根据营养护理流程模型,提取了在急诊室为老年人提供营养和饮食护理的水平数据,并进行了描述性总结:结果:共有 22 项研究被纳入综述。在急诊室入院时使用有效工具筛查营养状况:迷你营养评估-简表(n = 13)、营养不良通用筛查工具(n = 2)、短期营养评估问卷(n = 2)、NRS-2002(n = 1)和迷你营养评估-全表(n = 1)。5 项研究报告了全面营养评估。只有一项研究提到在医疗记录中记录了营养不良情况。没有一项研究对老年人从急诊室出院后的后续营养干预进行了描述:虽然有证据表明急诊室正在进行营养不良筛查,但缺乏有关后续营养护理(包括评估和治疗干预)的信息。这表明有必要对营养护理途径、实践、政策和研究进行全面探索,为老年人综合护理模式提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study. Correction: Development of a machine learning-based risk assessment model for loneliness among elderly Chinese: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. Fear of falling and its related factors in older adults following a fall in Kashan, Iran (2023-2024). The psychosocial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on Turkish older adults: is there a difference between males and females? CT parameters of psoas muscle predicts 28-day mortality in older patients with sepsis: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1