Whole lung lavage: considerations from the anesthesiology perspective.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001132
Rutuja Sikachi, Megan Anders
{"title":"Whole lung lavage: considerations from the anesthesiology perspective.","authors":"Rutuja Sikachi, Megan Anders","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Whole lung lavage (WLL) remains the standard treatment for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). The procedure involves meticulous preparation, including a multidisciplinary team and appropriate facilities, to ensure patient safety and procedural success. Effective anesthesia management is essential to allow for successful completion of the procedure and prevent complications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Effective anesthesia management, including total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and careful intraoperative monitoring, is essential to prevent complications such as hypoxemia and fluid overload. Proper airway control with a double-lumen tube, careful positioning, and continuous monitoring during the lavage phase are key to minimizing risks. Challenges such as fluid spillage and ventilation-perfusion mismatch must be managed proactively with techniques such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy and recruitment maneuvers. In cases of severe hypoxemia, advanced options like extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or sequential lavage may be required.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>WLL is a pivotal treatment for PAP, offering significant relief and improvement for many patients despite the challenges in standardizing the procedure due to the rare nature of the condition. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team involving pulmonologist, anesthesiologist, critical care personnel, operating room personnel and in some cases and centers, cardiothoracic surgeon and perfusionist is critical to the success of the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Whole lung lavage (WLL) remains the standard treatment for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). The procedure involves meticulous preparation, including a multidisciplinary team and appropriate facilities, to ensure patient safety and procedural success. Effective anesthesia management is essential to allow for successful completion of the procedure and prevent complications.

Recent findings: Effective anesthesia management, including total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and careful intraoperative monitoring, is essential to prevent complications such as hypoxemia and fluid overload. Proper airway control with a double-lumen tube, careful positioning, and continuous monitoring during the lavage phase are key to minimizing risks. Challenges such as fluid spillage and ventilation-perfusion mismatch must be managed proactively with techniques such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy and recruitment maneuvers. In cases of severe hypoxemia, advanced options like extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or sequential lavage may be required.

Summary: WLL is a pivotal treatment for PAP, offering significant relief and improvement for many patients despite the challenges in standardizing the procedure due to the rare nature of the condition. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team involving pulmonologist, anesthesiologist, critical care personnel, operating room personnel and in some cases and centers, cardiothoracic surgeon and perfusionist is critical to the success of the procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全肺灌洗:从麻醉学角度考虑问题。
审查目的:全肺灌洗(WLL)仍是肺泡蛋白沉积症(PAP)的标准治疗方法。为确保患者的安全和手术的成功,手术前需要进行细致的准备,包括多学科团队和适当的设施。有效的麻醉管理对成功完成手术和预防并发症至关重要:有效的麻醉管理,包括全静脉麻醉(TIVA)和仔细的术中监测,对于预防低氧血症和体液过多等并发症至关重要。在灌洗阶段使用双腔管进行适当的气道控制、仔细定位和持续监测是将风险降至最低的关键。必须通过纤维支气管镜检查和招募操作等技术积极应对液体溢出和通气-灌注不匹配等挑战。小结:WLL 是治疗 PAP 的关键方法,尽管由于该病症的罕见性,在标准化手术方面存在挑战,但仍为许多患者带来了显著的缓解和改善。多学科团队(包括肺科医生、麻醉科医生、重症监护人员、手术室人员,在某些情况下还包括心胸外科医生和灌注师)的参与对手术的成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Household air pollution and respiratory health in Africa: persistent risk and unchanged health burdens. Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians? The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications. Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease: current understanding and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1