Central auditory processing and cognitive abilities after mild traumatic brain injury in school-aged children.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2424871
Fauve Duquette-Laplante, Benoît Jutras, Jocelyn Gravel, Miriam H Beauchamp, Justine Ratelle, Isabelle Gagnon, Amineh Koravand
{"title":"Central auditory processing and cognitive abilities after mild traumatic brain injury in school-aged children.","authors":"Fauve Duquette-Laplante, Benoît Jutras, Jocelyn Gravel, Miriam H Beauchamp, Justine Ratelle, Isabelle Gagnon, Amineh Koravand","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2424871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study aimed to explore (1) school-aged children's auditory and cognitive abilities and (2) their perceptions (self-reported and parents) of listening behaviours and symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twenty-one children aged 8 to 12 participated in this study. Eleven children with mTBI were diagnosed in the emergency department, and 10 were matched controls. They were assessed twice, in the acute (≤14 days) and chronic (≥3 months) stages post-injury, using six central auditory behavioural tests, a cognitive screening battery, and questionnaires. ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group differences were present in three auditory tests as children with mTBI obtained poorer scores than controls (Pitch Pattern Sequence Tests - PPST: <i>p</i> = 0.037; Gap In Noise test - GIN threshold: <i>p</i> = 0.046; Duration Pattern Test - DPT: <i>p</i> = 0.053), but not for perceived listening behaviours and cognitive abilities. Correlations were found only between perceived listening behaviours and reported mTBI symptoms for parents (<i>p =</i>0.014) and children (<i>p =</i>0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Auditory abilities, mostly those related to temporal processing, were affected following mTBI, independently of cognitive abilities. Better identification of auditory processing difficulties following mTBI will improve treatment and resource allocation for children.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2424871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to explore (1) school-aged children's auditory and cognitive abilities and (2) their perceptions (self-reported and parents) of listening behaviours and symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Study sample: Twenty-one children aged 8 to 12 participated in this study. Eleven children with mTBI were diagnosed in the emergency department, and 10 were matched controls. They were assessed twice, in the acute (≤14 days) and chronic (≥3 months) stages post-injury, using six central auditory behavioural tests, a cognitive screening battery, and questionnaires. ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed.

Results: Group differences were present in three auditory tests as children with mTBI obtained poorer scores than controls (Pitch Pattern Sequence Tests - PPST: p = 0.037; Gap In Noise test - GIN threshold: p = 0.046; Duration Pattern Test - DPT: p = 0.053), but not for perceived listening behaviours and cognitive abilities. Correlations were found only between perceived listening behaviours and reported mTBI symptoms for parents (p =0.014) and children (p =0.002).

Conclusions: Auditory abilities, mostly those related to temporal processing, were affected following mTBI, independently of cognitive abilities. Better identification of auditory processing difficulties following mTBI will improve treatment and resource allocation for children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄儿童轻度脑外伤后的中枢听觉处理和认知能力。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨(1)学龄儿童的听觉和认知能力;(2)他们对轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后倾听行为和症状的看法(自我报告和父母报告):设计:前瞻性队列研究:21名8至12岁的儿童参与了这项研究。其中 11 名儿童在急诊科确诊为轻微脑损伤,10 名儿童为匹配对照组。他们在受伤后的急性期(≤14 天)和慢性期(≥3 个月)接受了两次评估,评估中使用了六种中央听觉行为测试、认知筛查电池和调查问卷。进行了方差分析和相关分析:结果表明:在三项听觉测试中,mTBI 患儿的得分均低于对照组(音高模式序列测试 - PPST:p = 0.037;噪声间隙测试 - GIN阈值:p = 0.046;持续时间模式测试 - DPT:p = 0.053),存在群体差异,但在感知听觉行为和认知能力方面不存在群体差异。只有家长(p =0.014)和儿童(p =0.002)的感知倾听行为与所报告的 mTBI 症状之间存在相关性:结论:听觉能力(主要是与时间处理相关的能力)在 mTBI 后受到影响,与认知能力无关。更好地识别mTBI后的听觉处理障碍将改善对儿童的治疗和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1