Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x
Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon
{"title":"Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.","authors":"Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup> or 1.3 × 1.3 mm<sup>2</sup>; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"71-86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods: Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 or 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.

Results: The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.

Conclusion: High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌的性能:一项多读取器研究。
目的:比较乳腺放射摄影、乳腺超声波(US)、高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)、动态对比增强乳腺磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)及其组合在检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌(EBC)(包括导管原位癌(DCIS))方面的效果:对连续接受 3 T 乳腺 MRI(包括 DW-MRI,b 值为 0、800 和 1200 s/mm2;平面内分辨率为 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 或 1.3 × 1.3 mm2;切片厚度为 3 mm)检查的 33 名筛查出早期乳腺癌(60 例纯 DCIS、36 例有微小浸润的 DCIS 和 207 例小于 20 mm 的浸润癌)的女性进行回顾性研究。每项检查均由三名放射科医生独立审查。统计分析包括卡方检验(Chi-square test)、癌症检出率比较的 McNemar 检验和阅片员之间一致性的 Fleiss' Kappa 检验。混合效应逻辑回归分析用于评估与 DW-MRI 癌症检测相关的因素:结果:乳腺X光检查的癌症总检出率为54.8%,乳腺US检查为71.0%,DW-MRI为81.5%,DCE-MRI为87.1%。经 McNemar 检验,DW-MRI 检测出的癌症数量高于乳腺 X 线照相术(调整后的 p 结论:DW-MRI 检测出的癌症数量高于乳腺 X 线照相术):在检测临床隐匿性EBC(包括DCIS)方面,高分辨率DW-MRI加乳腺X光检查的癌症检出率与DCE-MRI加乳腺X光检查相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Rb expression in metastatic ER-positive breast cancer: implications for precision oncology. Automated calculation of background parenchymal enhancement as a biomarker of treatment responses and recurrence-free survival in breast cancer. Risk of CNS relapse following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. House value as an individual socioeconomic indicator for breast cancer survival and late-stage diagnosis: a population-based cohort study from Northern Ireland. Correction to: A Canadian real‑world, multi‑center, prospective, observational study assessing the treatment duration, the treatment sequence, and the overall survival for patients treated with endocrine therapy ± targeted therapy in HR + HER2‑negative advanced breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1