Biomechanical stress analysis of Type-A aortic dissection at pre-dissection, post-dissection, and post-repair states

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109310
Christina Sun , Tongran Qin , Asanish Kalyanasundaram , John Elefteriades , Wei Sun , Liang Liang
{"title":"Biomechanical stress analysis of Type-A aortic dissection at pre-dissection, post-dissection, and post-repair states","authors":"Christina Sun ,&nbsp;Tongran Qin ,&nbsp;Asanish Kalyanasundaram ,&nbsp;John Elefteriades ,&nbsp;Wei Sun ,&nbsp;Liang Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute type A aortic dissection remains a deadly and elusive condition, with risk factors such as hypertension, bicuspid aortic valves, and genetic predispositions. As existing guidelines for surgical intervention based solely on aneurysm diameter face scrutiny, there is a growing need to consider other predictors and parameters, including wall stress, in assessing dissection risk. Through our research, we aim to elucidate the biomechanical underpinnings of aortic dissection and provide valuable insights into its prediction and prevention.</div><div>We applied finite element analysis (FEA) to assess stress distribution on a rare dataset comprising computed tomography (CT) images obtained from eight patients at three stages of aortic dissection: pre-dissection (preD), post-dissection (postD), and post-repair (postR). Our findings reveal significant increases in both mean and peak aortic wall stresses during the transition from the preD state to the postD state, reflecting the mechanical impact of dissection. Surgical repair effectively restores aortic wall diameter to pre-dissection levels, documenting its effectiveness in mitigating further complications. Furthermore, we identified stress concentration regions within the aortic wall that closely correlated with observed dissection borders, offering insights into high-risk areas.</div><div>This study demonstrates the importance of considering biomechanical factors when assessing aortic dissection risk. Despite some limitations, such as uniform wall thickness assumptions and the absence of dynamic blood flow considerations, our patient-specific FEA approach provides valuable mechanistic insights into aortic dissection. These findings hold promise for improving predictive models and informing clinical decisions to enhance patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109310"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524013957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute type A aortic dissection remains a deadly and elusive condition, with risk factors such as hypertension, bicuspid aortic valves, and genetic predispositions. As existing guidelines for surgical intervention based solely on aneurysm diameter face scrutiny, there is a growing need to consider other predictors and parameters, including wall stress, in assessing dissection risk. Through our research, we aim to elucidate the biomechanical underpinnings of aortic dissection and provide valuable insights into its prediction and prevention.
We applied finite element analysis (FEA) to assess stress distribution on a rare dataset comprising computed tomography (CT) images obtained from eight patients at three stages of aortic dissection: pre-dissection (preD), post-dissection (postD), and post-repair (postR). Our findings reveal significant increases in both mean and peak aortic wall stresses during the transition from the preD state to the postD state, reflecting the mechanical impact of dissection. Surgical repair effectively restores aortic wall diameter to pre-dissection levels, documenting its effectiveness in mitigating further complications. Furthermore, we identified stress concentration regions within the aortic wall that closely correlated with observed dissection borders, offering insights into high-risk areas.
This study demonstrates the importance of considering biomechanical factors when assessing aortic dissection risk. Despite some limitations, such as uniform wall thickness assumptions and the absence of dynamic blood flow considerations, our patient-specific FEA approach provides valuable mechanistic insights into aortic dissection. These findings hold promise for improving predictive models and informing clinical decisions to enhance patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 型主动脉夹层在夹层前、夹层后和修复后状态下的生物力学应力分析。
急性 A 型主动脉夹层仍然是一种致命而难以捉摸的疾病,其风险因素包括高血压、主动脉瓣双瓣和遗传倾向。由于现有的仅以动脉瘤直径为基础的手术干预指南面临严格审查,因此在评估夹层风险时越来越有必要考虑包括动脉壁应力在内的其他预测因素和参数。我们的研究旨在阐明主动脉夹层的生物力学基础,并为其预测和预防提供有价值的见解。我们应用有限元分析(FEA)评估了主动脉夹层三个阶段(夹层前(preD)、夹层后(postD)和修复后(postR))八名患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像组成的罕见数据集的应力分布。我们的研究结果表明,在主动脉夹层前状态向主动脉夹层后状态过渡的过程中,主动脉壁的平均应力和峰值应力都明显增加,这反映了夹层的机械影响。手术修复能有效地将主动脉壁直径恢复到夹层前的水平,证明了其在减轻进一步并发症方面的有效性。此外,我们还确定了主动脉壁上的应力集中区域,这些区域与观察到的夹层边界密切相关,为了解高风险区域提供了线索。这项研究证明了在评估主动脉夹层风险时考虑生物力学因素的重要性。尽管存在一些局限性,如均匀壁厚假设和缺乏动态血流考虑,但我们的患者特异性有限元分析方法为主动脉夹层提供了宝贵的机理见解。这些发现有望改善预测模型,为临床决策提供信息,从而加强对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
An adaptive enhanced human memory algorithm for multi-level image segmentation for pathological lung cancer images. Integrating multimodal learning for improved vital health parameter estimation. Riemannian manifold-based geometric clustering of continuous glucose monitoring to improve personalized diabetes management. Transformative artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: Advancements in diagnostic techniques. Artificial intelligence and deep learning algorithms for epigenetic sequence analysis: A review for epigeneticists and AI experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1