The Oswestry Disability Index is not a good measure for low back pain in adolescents: A Rasch analysis of data from 200 people.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1177/02692155241296802
Mitchell Selhorst, Todd Degenhart, Michael Jackowski, Samuel Meyer, Alexander Rospert
{"title":"The Oswestry Disability Index is not a good measure for low back pain in adolescents: A Rasch analysis of data from 200 people.","authors":"Mitchell Selhorst, Todd Degenhart, Michael Jackowski, Samuel Meyer, Alexander Rospert","doi":"10.1177/02692155241296802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Oswestry Disability Index in adolescents with low back pain through Rasch analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a psychometric study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Physical therapy clinics of a large pediatric hospital in Columbus, Ohio (United States).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two hundred adolescent patients with low back pain (112 female, 15.4 ± 1.9 years old).</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>The modified Oswestry Disability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean modified Oswestry Disability Index score was 17.1 ± 12.1, with scores ranging from 0 to 56 on the 100-point scale. The Rasch person reliability for the Oswestry Disability Index was 0.70, representing minimal acceptable person reliability. The Oswestry Disability Index demonstrated poor item spacing, hierarchy, and targeting of the adolescents' disability level (>1 logit between person mean and item mean). A significant misfit was observed in three of 10 items. There were significant issues with the functioning of responses on all items of the Oswestry Disability Index. Principal component analysis of residuals revealed a ratio of 5.3:1, demonstrating acceptable unidimensionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to multiple psychometric issues, the Oswestry Disability should not be used to assess disability in adolescents with low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index significantly mistargets adolescent ability and only provides an acceptable assessment of the most disabled adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241296802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241296802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Oswestry Disability Index in adolescents with low back pain through Rasch analysis.

Design: This is a psychometric study.

Setting: Physical therapy clinics of a large pediatric hospital in Columbus, Ohio (United States).

Subjects: Two hundred adolescent patients with low back pain (112 female, 15.4 ± 1.9 years old).

Main measure: The modified Oswestry Disability Index.

Results: The mean modified Oswestry Disability Index score was 17.1 ± 12.1, with scores ranging from 0 to 56 on the 100-point scale. The Rasch person reliability for the Oswestry Disability Index was 0.70, representing minimal acceptable person reliability. The Oswestry Disability Index demonstrated poor item spacing, hierarchy, and targeting of the adolescents' disability level (>1 logit between person mean and item mean). A significant misfit was observed in three of 10 items. There were significant issues with the functioning of responses on all items of the Oswestry Disability Index. Principal component analysis of residuals revealed a ratio of 5.3:1, demonstrating acceptable unidimensionality.

Conclusion: Due to multiple psychometric issues, the Oswestry Disability should not be used to assess disability in adolescents with low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index significantly mistargets adolescent ability and only provides an acceptable assessment of the most disabled adolescents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Oswestry Disability Index)并不能很好地衡量青少年的腰背痛:对 200 人数据的 Rasch 分析。
目的通过 Rasch 分析法评估腰背痛青少年改良 Oswestry 残疾指数的心理计量特性:设计:这是一项心理测量研究:美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市一家大型儿科医院的理疗诊所:主要测量指标:改良 Oswestry 残疾指数:结果:改良 Oswestry 残疾指数的平均值为(17.1 ± 12.1)分,100 分制的评分范围为 0 至 56 分。Oswestry 失能指数的 Rasch 人信度为 0.70,代表最低可接受的人信度。奥斯韦特里残疾指数的项目间距、层次性和青少年残疾程度的针对性都很差(个人平均值与项目平均值之间的对数大于 1)。在 10 个项目中,有 3 个出现了明显的不匹配。在 Oswestry 残疾指数的所有项目中,回答的功能都存在重大问题。残差的主成分分析显示比率为 5.3:1,显示了可接受的单维性:结论:由于存在多种心理测量问题,Oswestry残疾指数不应用于评估青少年腰背痛患者的残疾情况。Oswestry残疾指数严重误导了青少年的能力,只能对残疾程度最严重的青少年进行可接受的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1