Prospective randomized evaluation of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during complex electrophysiological procedures under deep sedation: the TRACES trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s00392-024-02570-8
Yannick Teumer, Alexandra Buss, Federica Diofano, Deniz Aktolga, Lyuboslav Katov, Carlo Bothner, Tillman Dahme, Wolfgang Öchsner, Benjamin Mayer, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Karolina Weinmann-Emhardt
{"title":"Prospective randomized evaluation of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during complex electrophysiological procedures under deep sedation: the TRACES trial.","authors":"Yannick Teumer, Alexandra Buss, Federica Diofano, Deniz Aktolga, Lyuboslav Katov, Carlo Bothner, Tillman Dahme, Wolfgang Öchsner, Benjamin Mayer, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Karolina Weinmann-Emhardt","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02570-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of interventional electrophysiology is rapidly growing. For safe and efficient procedures sedation is needed for patient comfort and immobility. However, sedative and analgesic agents can induce respiratory depression, risking hypercapnia, hypoxia, and hypotension. This study evaluates the impact of adding transcutaneous carbon-dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring to standard monitoring practices in electrophysiological procedures under deep sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized study at Ulm University Heart Center included 726 patients undergoing treatment under deep sedation between August 2019 and October 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to standard monitoring or standard monitoring with continuous transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring (TCM-group). Standard monitoring involved non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and frequent peripheral venous blood gas analysis. The primary composite endpoint was SpO<sub>2</sub> dips below 90% and pathological changes in venous blood gas analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TCM-group included 357 patients, and the standard group had 348. The primary composite endpoint was reached by 195 patients (54.8%) in the TCM-group and 195 patients (56.5%) in the standard group (p = 0.642). However, peripheral venous CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure increased by more than 30% from baseline more often in the standard group than in the TCM-group (p = 0.005). Additionally, a venous pH below 7.25 was more common in the standard group (p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring offers no significant benefit for the primary combined endpoint over standard monitoring during electrophysiological procedures, it helps mitigate significant CO<sub>2</sub> elevations and respiratory acidosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04038476, 29 July 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02570-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The field of interventional electrophysiology is rapidly growing. For safe and efficient procedures sedation is needed for patient comfort and immobility. However, sedative and analgesic agents can induce respiratory depression, risking hypercapnia, hypoxia, and hypotension. This study evaluates the impact of adding transcutaneous carbon-dioxide (CO2) monitoring to standard monitoring practices in electrophysiological procedures under deep sedation.

Methods: This prospective, randomized study at Ulm University Heart Center included 726 patients undergoing treatment under deep sedation between August 2019 and October 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to standard monitoring or standard monitoring with continuous transcutaneous CO2 monitoring (TCM-group). Standard monitoring involved non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and frequent peripheral venous blood gas analysis. The primary composite endpoint was SpO2 dips below 90% and pathological changes in venous blood gas analysis.

Results: The TCM-group included 357 patients, and the standard group had 348. The primary composite endpoint was reached by 195 patients (54.8%) in the TCM-group and 195 patients (56.5%) in the standard group (p = 0.642). However, peripheral venous CO2 partial pressure increased by more than 30% from baseline more often in the standard group than in the TCM-group (p = 0.005). Additionally, a venous pH below 7.25 was more common in the standard group (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: While transcutaneous CO2 monitoring offers no significant benefit for the primary combined endpoint over standard monitoring during electrophysiological procedures, it helps mitigate significant CO2 elevations and respiratory acidosis.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04038476, 29 July 2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在深度镇静状态下进行复杂电生理程序期间经皮二氧化碳监测的前瞻性随机评估:TRACES 试验。
背景:介入电生理学领域正在迅速发展。为了安全有效地进行手术,需要使用镇静剂让病人感到舒适并保持不动。然而,镇静剂和镇痛剂会诱发呼吸抑制,导致高碳酸血症、缺氧和低血压。本研究评估了在深度镇静状态下进行电生理手术的标准监测方法中增加经皮二氧化碳(CO2)监测的影响:乌尔姆大学心脏中心的这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了 2019 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月期间接受深度镇静治疗的 726 名患者。患者被随机分配到标准监测组或带有持续经皮二氧化碳监测的标准监测组(TCM 组)。标准监测包括无创血压、血氧饱和度(SpO2)和频繁的外周静脉血气分析。主要的综合终点是 SpO2 下降到 90% 以下和静脉血气分析的病理变化:结果:中医组有 357 名患者,标准组有 348 名患者。中医组中有 195 名患者(54.8%)达到了主要综合终点,标准组中有 195 名患者(56.5%)达到了主要综合终点(P = 0.642)。然而,标准组外周静脉二氧化碳分压比基线增加 30% 以上的比例高于中医组(p = 0.005)。此外,静脉 pH 值低于 7.25 在标准组更为常见(p = 0.047):结论:虽然经皮二氧化碳监测与电生理程序期间的标准监测相比,在主要综合终点方面没有明显优势,但它有助于缓解二氧化碳显著升高和呼吸性酸中毒:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04038476,2019 年 7 月 29 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Inflammation, Lp(a) and cardiovascular mortality: results from the LURIC study. Letter to the editor: "Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals myocardial involvement in patients with active stage of inflammatory bowel disease". Response to the Letter to the editor: "cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals myocardial involvement in patients with active stage of inflammatory bowel disease" (CRCD-D-24-01694). Impact of GDMT on outcomes after mitral valve edge-to-edge repair stratified by SMR proportionality. Manual support during robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1