Clinical outcomes of right ventricular outflow tract stenting compared to surgical shunting in late-presenting children.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1395132
Radityo Prakoso, Resi Citra Dewi, Brian Mendel, Celly Anantaria Atmadikoesoemah, Salomo Purba, Damba Dwisepto Aulia Sakti, Nanda Iryuza, Yovi Kurniawati, Renan Sukmawan
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of right ventricular outflow tract stenting compared to surgical shunting in late-presenting children.","authors":"Radityo Prakoso, Resi Citra Dewi, Brian Mendel, Celly Anantaria Atmadikoesoemah, Salomo Purba, Damba Dwisepto Aulia Sakti, Nanda Iryuza, Yovi Kurniawati, Renan Sukmawan","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1395132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stenting as an alternative palliation for patients with stenotic RVOTs is increasingly recognized. However, a notable gap remains in the literature regarding the efficacy and the comparative outcomes between RVOT stenting and the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (mBTS) in children older than one year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of clinical data from patients aged one year to 18 years with stenotic RVOTs who underwent RVOT stenting or mBTS procedures at our institution between December 2019 and October 2022. We compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including re-hospitalization, re-intervention, and mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, and discharge oxygen saturation between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 58 patients (51.7% male) with a median age of 2.6 years (IQR: 2-8.1) and a median weight of 9.7 kg (IQR: 7.5-17.5). Among them, 18 (31%) patients received RVOT stenting, and 40 (68.9%) patients had mBTS. The median age for the RVOT stenting group was 92.5 months (IQR: 31.2-152) compared to 26.5 months (IQR: 23.0-54.0) for the mBTS group (<i>p</i> = 0.218). MACEs occurred in 4 (22.2%) patients with RVOT stents and 8 (20%) patients with mBTS (<i>p</i> = 0.624). Patients with mBTS had a longer ICU stay (median 3.5 days, IQR, 2-5) compared to those with RVOT stents (median 2 days, IQR: 1-2) (<i>p</i> = 0.295). Conversely, the hospital stay for patients with mBTS was shorter (median 10 days, IQR, 7.5-13.7) than for those with RVOT stents (median 11.5 days, IQR, 7-19) (<i>p</i> = 0.045). The median discharge oxygen saturation was 87% (IQR: 83-88) in the mBTS group and 80% (IQR: 75-87) in the RVOT stenting group (<i>p</i> = 0.212).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RVOT stenting as palliation to stenotic RVOTs in children older than one year demonstrated outcomes comparable to mBTS in terms of MACE and achieving oxygen saturation targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1395132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1395132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stenting as an alternative palliation for patients with stenotic RVOTs is increasingly recognized. However, a notable gap remains in the literature regarding the efficacy and the comparative outcomes between RVOT stenting and the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (mBTS) in children older than one year.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of clinical data from patients aged one year to 18 years with stenotic RVOTs who underwent RVOT stenting or mBTS procedures at our institution between December 2019 and October 2022. We compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including re-hospitalization, re-intervention, and mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, and discharge oxygen saturation between the groups.

Results: We identified 58 patients (51.7% male) with a median age of 2.6 years (IQR: 2-8.1) and a median weight of 9.7 kg (IQR: 7.5-17.5). Among them, 18 (31%) patients received RVOT stenting, and 40 (68.9%) patients had mBTS. The median age for the RVOT stenting group was 92.5 months (IQR: 31.2-152) compared to 26.5 months (IQR: 23.0-54.0) for the mBTS group (p = 0.218). MACEs occurred in 4 (22.2%) patients with RVOT stents and 8 (20%) patients with mBTS (p = 0.624). Patients with mBTS had a longer ICU stay (median 3.5 days, IQR, 2-5) compared to those with RVOT stents (median 2 days, IQR: 1-2) (p = 0.295). Conversely, the hospital stay for patients with mBTS was shorter (median 10 days, IQR, 7.5-13.7) than for those with RVOT stents (median 11.5 days, IQR, 7-19) (p = 0.045). The median discharge oxygen saturation was 87% (IQR: 83-88) in the mBTS group and 80% (IQR: 75-87) in the RVOT stenting group (p = 0.212).

Conclusions: RVOT stenting as palliation to stenotic RVOTs in children older than one year demonstrated outcomes comparable to mBTS in terms of MACE and achieving oxygen saturation targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期患儿右心室流出道支架植入术与手术分流术的临床疗效对比。
背景:右心室流出道(RVOT)支架置入术作为RVOT狭窄患者的另一种姑息治疗方法日益得到认可。然而,关于 RVOT 支架植入术和改良布洛克-陶西格分流术(mBTS)在一岁以上儿童中的疗效和结果比较,文献中仍存在明显的空白:我们对2019年12月至2022年10月期间在我院接受RVOT支架植入术或mBTS手术的1岁至18岁RVOT狭窄患者的临床数据进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了两组患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括再次住院、再次介入和死亡率、住院时间和重症监护室住院时间,以及出院时的血氧饱和度:我们发现 58 名患者(51.7% 为男性),中位年龄为 2.6 岁(IQR:2-8.1),中位体重为 9.7 千克(IQR:7.5-17.5)。其中,18 名(31%)患者接受了 RVOT 支架植入术,40 名(68.9%)患者接受了 mBTS。RVOT 支架植入组的中位年龄为 92.5 个月(IQR:31.2-152),而 mBTS 组为 26.5 个月(IQR:23.0-54.0)(P = 0.218)。4例(22.2%)使用RVOT支架的患者和8例(20%)使用mBTS的患者发生了MACE(p = 0.624)。与使用 RVOT 支架的患者(中位数 2 天,IQR:1-2)相比,使用 mBTS 的患者在重症监护室的住院时间更长(中位数 3.5 天,IQR:2-5)(p = 0.295)。相反,mBTS 患者的住院时间(中位数 10 天,IQR:7.5-13.7)短于 RVOT 支架患者(中位数 11.5 天,IQR:7-19)(p = 0.045)。mBTS组的出院血氧饱和度中位数为87%(IQR:83-88),RVOT支架组为80%(IQR:75-87)(p = 0.212):结论:RVOT支架植入术作为缓解一岁以上儿童RVOT狭窄的方法,在MACE和达到血氧饱和度目标方面的疗效与mBTS相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Case Report: One-stop procedure for atrial fibrillation patients with dextrocardia. Case Report: Surgical management of traumatic giant coronary artery pseudoaneurysm with pericardial patch repair and ostium isolation. Eradicating rheumatic heart disease in Africa: have we made progress since the Drakensberg declaration? Inter-site comparability of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy traveling volunteers-a multi-site and multi-magnetic field strength study. Predictive value of percutaneous peripheral arterial compliance T in left ventricular diastolic function with coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1