Pediatric kidney transplantation in Europe, a clinical snapshot pilot.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1432027
Loes Oomen, Charlotte M H H T Bootsma-Robroeks, Antonia H M Bouts, Mar Carbonell Pradas, Romy Gander, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Paul König, Pedro Lopez Pereira, Olivier Dunand, Sara M F S Mosca, Michal Pac, Ludmila Podracka, Agnieszka A Prytula, Maria Sangermano, Renata Vitkevic, Jakub Zieg, Loes F M van der Zanden, Wout F J Feitz, Liesbeth L de Wall
{"title":"Pediatric kidney transplantation in Europe, a clinical snapshot pilot.","authors":"Loes Oomen, Charlotte M H H T Bootsma-Robroeks, Antonia H M Bouts, Mar Carbonell Pradas, Romy Gander, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Paul König, Pedro Lopez Pereira, Olivier Dunand, Sara M F S Mosca, Michal Pac, Ludmila Podracka, Agnieszka A Prytula, Maria Sangermano, Renata Vitkevic, Jakub Zieg, Loes F M van der Zanden, Wout F J Feitz, Liesbeth L de Wall","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1432027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric kidney transplantations are rarely performed, and there is limited knowledge about the diversity in current clinical practices across Europe. This study aims to explore the utility of clinical snapshot studies in identifying these disparities, establishing a foundation for future snapshot studies and standardization efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot clinical snapshot study was conducted, with invitations extended to all 109 pediatric kidney transplant centres in Europe. Each participating centre provided pre-, peri-, and postoperative data concerning their most recent thirty transplantations. The primary outcomes encompassed the evaluation of disparities in donor-recipient selection, surgical techniques, post-operative drainage procedures, and immunosuppressive therapy protocols. Secondary outcomes involved the analysis of rejection rates, incidence of infections, and graft survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 439 patients from fifteen centres (14%) in twelve countries, with varying transplant volumes (range 1-29 transplantations per year) and follow-up periods. Significant differences were found among centres in terms of donor types, cold and warm ischemia time, pre-emptive transplant rates, and kidney transplant drainage methods. The rate of living donors varied between 3% and 90% and the median duration of cold ischemia ranged was 770 min after deceased donation and 147 min after living donation. Basiliximab was the dominant induction therapy, yet steroid withdrawal varied widely. Infection, rejection, and graft survival rates also varied significantly between centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed substantial variation in clinical practices among European centres performing pediatric kidney transplantations. These findings could serve as a stimulus for international dialogue and collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"12 ","pages":"1432027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1432027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric kidney transplantations are rarely performed, and there is limited knowledge about the diversity in current clinical practices across Europe. This study aims to explore the utility of clinical snapshot studies in identifying these disparities, establishing a foundation for future snapshot studies and standardization efforts.

Methods: A pilot clinical snapshot study was conducted, with invitations extended to all 109 pediatric kidney transplant centres in Europe. Each participating centre provided pre-, peri-, and postoperative data concerning their most recent thirty transplantations. The primary outcomes encompassed the evaluation of disparities in donor-recipient selection, surgical techniques, post-operative drainage procedures, and immunosuppressive therapy protocols. Secondary outcomes involved the analysis of rejection rates, incidence of infections, and graft survival.

Results: The study involved 439 patients from fifteen centres (14%) in twelve countries, with varying transplant volumes (range 1-29 transplantations per year) and follow-up periods. Significant differences were found among centres in terms of donor types, cold and warm ischemia time, pre-emptive transplant rates, and kidney transplant drainage methods. The rate of living donors varied between 3% and 90% and the median duration of cold ischemia ranged was 770 min after deceased donation and 147 min after living donation. Basiliximab was the dominant induction therapy, yet steroid withdrawal varied widely. Infection, rejection, and graft survival rates also varied significantly between centres.

Conclusion: This study revealed substantial variation in clinical practices among European centres performing pediatric kidney transplantations. These findings could serve as a stimulus for international dialogue and collaboration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲小儿肾移植临床快照试验。
背景:小儿肾脏移植很少进行,而欧洲各国对目前临床实践的多样性了解有限。本研究旨在探索临床快照研究在识别这些差异方面的作用,为今后的快照研究和标准化工作奠定基础:我们向欧洲所有 109 个儿科肾移植中心发出了邀请,开展了一项临床快照试验研究。每个参与研究的中心都提供了最近三十例移植手术的术前、围手术期和术后数据。主要结果包括对供体和受体选择、手术技术、术后引流程序和免疫抑制治疗方案的差异进行评估。次要结果包括排斥率、感染发生率和移植物存活率的分析:这项研究涉及来自 12 个国家 15 个中心(14%)的 439 名患者,他们的移植量(每年 1-29 例移植)和随访时间各不相同。各中心在供体类型、冷和暖缺血时间、抢先移植率和肾移植引流方法等方面存在显著差异。活体捐献率介于 3% 和 90% 之间,冷缺血时间的中位数分别为死亡捐献后 770 分钟和活体捐献后 147 分钟。巴斯利西单抗是最主要的诱导疗法,但类固醇停药情况差异很大。感染率、排斥率和移植物存活率在不同中心之间也存在显著差异:这项研究揭示了欧洲小儿肾移植中心在临床实践中的巨大差异。这些发现可促进国际间的对话与合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Nurses' attitudes, behaviors, and barriers toward pressure ulcer prevention in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Ketogenic diets therapy in the management of epileptic spasms syndrome. Acute pancreatitis following asparaginase treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a heterozygous SPINK1 c.194 + 2T>C intronic variant: a case report. Biological effects of combinations of structurally diverse human milk oligosaccharides. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain levels in children with acquired demyelinating syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1