{"title":"A review of alternative measurements in strain imaging for ventricular arrhythmia prediction.","authors":"Spas Kitov, Lyudmila Vladimirova-Kitova","doi":"10.3897/folmed.66.e128267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global longitudinal strain has been established as a reliable tool to assess global left ventricular function and a marker of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction unrecognized by the ejection fraction. On the other hand, ventricular arrhythmias are the most common cause of sudden cardiac death. Their early detection is a challenge. Possible prognostic markers for the risk of ventricular arrhythmias are discussed in the literature - electrocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography, radionuclide imaging, and markers from new echocardiographic techniques. Of the latter, at this stage of knowledge, several markers have been discussed as informative for predicting ventricular arrhythmias - global longitudinal strain, radial strain and mechanical dispersion, and most recently, myocardial work. As far as we are informed, global longitudinal strain is particularly useful in patients with normal echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, left ventricular wall thickness, and aortic root. The relationship between mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmias has been widely studied. The relationship has been studied more in some patient populations - heart failure, ischemic heart disease, long QT syndrome and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease. The role of mechanical dispersion as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in metabolic syndrome is scarce.</p>","PeriodicalId":12415,"journal":{"name":"Folia medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.66.e128267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global longitudinal strain has been established as a reliable tool to assess global left ventricular function and a marker of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction unrecognized by the ejection fraction. On the other hand, ventricular arrhythmias are the most common cause of sudden cardiac death. Their early detection is a challenge. Possible prognostic markers for the risk of ventricular arrhythmias are discussed in the literature - electrocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography, radionuclide imaging, and markers from new echocardiographic techniques. Of the latter, at this stage of knowledge, several markers have been discussed as informative for predicting ventricular arrhythmias - global longitudinal strain, radial strain and mechanical dispersion, and most recently, myocardial work. As far as we are informed, global longitudinal strain is particularly useful in patients with normal echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, left ventricular wall thickness, and aortic root. The relationship between mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmias has been widely studied. The relationship has been studied more in some patient populations - heart failure, ischemic heart disease, long QT syndrome and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease. The role of mechanical dispersion as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in metabolic syndrome is scarce.