Retraction: Comparison between the traditional non-guided and a novel ultrasound-guided technique for office fitting of intrauterine contraceptive devices.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16003
{"title":"Retraction: Comparison between the traditional non-guided and a novel ultrasound-guided technique for office fitting of intrauterine contraceptive devices.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>M. S. E. Elsedeek, \"Comparison Between the Traditional Non-guided and a Novel Ultrasound-guided Technique for Office Fitting of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices,\" International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric 133, no. 3 (2016): 338-341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.013. The above article, published online on 23 February 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Michael Geary; the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on concerns raised by a third party. Although the paper does not specify which statistical methods were used, the editors found that numerous results could not be reproduced from the summary data using t-tests or chi-squared tests. The author was invited to comment on the concerns and provide supporting data but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusion reported in this article unreliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

M. S. E. Elsedeek, "Comparison Between the Traditional Non-guided and a Novel Ultrasound-guided Technique for Office Fitting of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric 133, no. 3 (2016): 338-341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.013. The above article, published online on 23 February 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Michael Geary; the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation based on concerns raised by a third party. Although the paper does not specify which statistical methods were used, the editors found that numerous results could not be reproduced from the summary data using t-tests or chi-squared tests. The author was invited to comment on the concerns and provide supporting data but did not respond. The editors consider the results and conclusion reported in this article unreliable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撤回:传统非引导技术与新型超声引导技术在办公室安装宫内避孕器方面的比较。
S.E.Elsedeek,"传统非引导和新型超声引导技术在办公室安装宫内避孕器的比较",《国际妇科与产科杂志》133 期(2016 年):no.3 (2016):338-341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.013.上述文章于 2016 年 2 月 23 日在线发表于 Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com),经期刊主编 Michael Geary、国际妇产科联合会和 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.同意,已被撤回。根据第三方提出的疑虑进行调查后,各方同意撤稿。虽然论文没有说明使用了哪些统计方法,但编辑们发现,许多结果无法通过t检验或秩方检验从汇总数据中再现。编辑请作者就这些问题发表评论并提供支持数据,但作者没有回应。编辑认为本文报告的结果和结论不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1