Synopsis of the 2023 U.S. Department of VA and U.S. DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Pregnancy.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae517
Michael Clark, Carrie Kairys, Elizabeth W Patton, Laura Miller, Adam Edward Lang, James Sall, Jennifer Ballard-Hernandez, Lisa Wayman, Sarah Davis-Arnold
{"title":"Synopsis of the 2023 U.S. Department of VA and U.S. DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Pregnancy.","authors":"Michael Clark, Carrie Kairys, Elizabeth W Patton, Laura Miller, Adam Edward Lang, James Sall, Jennifer Ballard-Hernandez, Lisa Wayman, Sarah Davis-Arnold","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This Clinical Practical Guideline provides recommendations based on a systematic review of the evidence to address critical decision points in the management of pregnancy. The guideline is intended to improve patient outcomes and local management of patients who are pregnant. This CPG is based on a systematic review of both clinical and epidemiological evidence and was developed by a panel of multidisciplinary experts. The Work Group provides clear and comprehensive evidence-based recommendations incorporating current information and practices targeting practitioners throughout the DoD and VA Health Care systems. The guideline is intended to improve patient outcomes and local management of patients who are pregnant. This CPG does not address every aspect of routine pregnancy care and is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to all care needed in pregnancy. It also addresses some clinically important and generally accepted standards of pregnancy care interventions that do not have sufficient high-quality evidence to support standalone recommendations. Additionally, it highlights emerging topics that have the potential to impact pregnancy care in the future and identifies gaps in the literature that warrant further research.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The development of all VA/DoD guidelines is directed by the Evidence-Based Practice Guideline Work Group and adheres to the standards for trustworthy guidelines that were set by the National Academy of Medicine. A patient focus group was convened to assess important aspects of treatment for patients and to gain information about patient values and preferences. The Lewin Group, a contracted third party with expertise in CPG development, facilitated meetings and the development of key questions using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing, and setting format. Consensus was achieved among the Work Group through an iterative process involving discussions on conference calls and in person during the recommendation development meeting. An independent third party, ECRI, conducted the systematic evidence review, which the guideline Work Group then used to develop recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (7-9). The search methods and results are detailed in the full guideline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This CPG provides 28 clinical practice recommendations that cover selected topics that the Work Group deemed had high priority need for evidence-based standards. The recommendations are divided into 3 main categories: routine care, complicated obstetrics, and mental health. An algorithm delineating recommended interventions and appropriate timing of these interventions over the course of the pregnancy and postpartum period was also created.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPG is not intended to define standards of care nor address all care needed in pregnancy; it does provide comprehensive guidance for routine pregnancy care. It aligns with the VA and DOD's goal of providing care that is consistent in quality and utilization of resources in efforts to reduce errors and inappropriate variations in practices. In total, the Work Group identified 71 items needing further study, including areas requiring stronger evidence to support current recommendations and newer topics that will guide future guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This Clinical Practical Guideline provides recommendations based on a systematic review of the evidence to address critical decision points in the management of pregnancy. The guideline is intended to improve patient outcomes and local management of patients who are pregnant. This CPG is based on a systematic review of both clinical and epidemiological evidence and was developed by a panel of multidisciplinary experts. The Work Group provides clear and comprehensive evidence-based recommendations incorporating current information and practices targeting practitioners throughout the DoD and VA Health Care systems. The guideline is intended to improve patient outcomes and local management of patients who are pregnant. This CPG does not address every aspect of routine pregnancy care and is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to all care needed in pregnancy. It also addresses some clinically important and generally accepted standards of pregnancy care interventions that do not have sufficient high-quality evidence to support standalone recommendations. Additionally, it highlights emerging topics that have the potential to impact pregnancy care in the future and identifies gaps in the literature that warrant further research.

Materials and methods: The development of all VA/DoD guidelines is directed by the Evidence-Based Practice Guideline Work Group and adheres to the standards for trustworthy guidelines that were set by the National Academy of Medicine. A patient focus group was convened to assess important aspects of treatment for patients and to gain information about patient values and preferences. The Lewin Group, a contracted third party with expertise in CPG development, facilitated meetings and the development of key questions using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing, and setting format. Consensus was achieved among the Work Group through an iterative process involving discussions on conference calls and in person during the recommendation development meeting. An independent third party, ECRI, conducted the systematic evidence review, which the guideline Work Group then used to develop recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (7-9). The search methods and results are detailed in the full guideline.

Results: This CPG provides 28 clinical practice recommendations that cover selected topics that the Work Group deemed had high priority need for evidence-based standards. The recommendations are divided into 3 main categories: routine care, complicated obstetrics, and mental health. An algorithm delineating recommended interventions and appropriate timing of these interventions over the course of the pregnancy and postpartum period was also created.

Conclusion: The CPG is not intended to define standards of care nor address all care needed in pregnancy; it does provide comprehensive guidance for routine pregnancy care. It aligns with the VA and DOD's goal of providing care that is consistent in quality and utilization of resources in efforts to reduce errors and inappropriate variations in practices. In total, the Work Group identified 71 items needing further study, including areas requiring stronger evidence to support current recommendations and newer topics that will guide future guideline development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023 年美国退伍军人事务部和美国国防部妊娠管理临床实践指南》概要。
导言:本《临床实用指南》在对证据进行系统回顾的基础上,针对妊娠管理中的关键决策点提出了建议。该指南旨在改善患者的预后和当地对妊娠患者的管理。本《实用指南》基于对临床和流行病学证据的系统回顾,由一个多学科专家小组制定。工作组针对国防部和退伍军人医疗保健系统的从业人员,结合当前的信息和实践,提出了明确而全面的循证建议。该指南旨在改善妊娠患者的治疗效果和地方管理。本 CPG 并不涉及常规孕期护理的方方面面,也无意成为孕期所需的所有护理的综合指南。它还涉及一些临床上重要的、普遍接受的孕期保健干预标准,但这些标准并没有足够的高质量证据来支持独立的建议。此外,它还强调了有可能影响未来孕期保健的新课题,并指出了需要进一步研究的文献空白:所有退伍军人事务部/国防部指南的制定均由循证实践指南工作组指导,并遵循美国国家医学院制定的值得信赖的指南标准。我们召集了一个患者焦点小组,以评估患者治疗的重要方面,并了解患者的价值观和偏好。卢因集团(Lewin Group)是一家在制定 CPG 方面具有专长的签约第三方机构,它为会议的召开提供了便利,并采用人群、干预、比较、结果、时间和环境的格式制定了关键问题。工作组通过电话会议讨论和在建议制定会议期间亲自参加讨论的反复过程达成了共识。独立第三方 ECRI 进行了系统性证据审查,指南工作组随后使用建议分级评估、制定和评价系统 (7-9) 制定了建议。搜索方法和结果详见指南全文:本 CPG 提供了 28 项临床实践建议,涵盖了工作组认为高度需要循证标准的选定主题。这些建议分为三大类:常规护理、复杂产科和心理健康。此外,还创建了一个算法,划定了建议的干预措施以及在孕期和产后采取这些干预措施的适当时机:该 CPG 既不是为了定义护理标准,也不是为了解决孕期所需的所有护理问题;它确实为常规孕期护理提供了全面的指导。它与退伍军人事务部和国防部的目标一致,即提供质量和资源利用一致的护理,努力减少错误和不适当的做法差异。工作小组总共确定了 71 个需要进一步研究的项目,包括需要更有力的证据来支持当前建议的领域,以及将指导未来指南制定的新课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetry as a Lagging Indicator of Occupational Exposure to Nitrous Oxide in Pediatric Sedation: A Collaborative Process Improvement Project With Industrial Hygiene. Navigating the Leadership Tightrope: A Case Study in the Art of Following and Supporting. Utilization of Prognosis Assignment: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Military Periodontists. High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: An Atypical Mass in the Colon. Burden of Musculoskeletal Injuries in U.S. Active Duty Service Members: A 12-Year Study Spanning Fiscal Years 2010-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1