Development and initial validation of the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS).

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1177/13524585241290102
Anne Kever, Lauren B Heuer, Leila Simani, Victoria M Leavitt
{"title":"Development and initial validation of the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS).","authors":"Anne Kever, Lauren B Heuer, Leila Simani, Victoria M Leavitt","doi":"10.1177/13524585241290102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common in neurologic diseases. Precise measurement of cognitive change over time is necessary for isolating disease-related patterns from normal age-related decline. Existing measures of subjective cognition, however, focus on present status. There is, to our knowledge, no currently available self-report measure of cognitive change. We therefore developed the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS), which assesses perceived cognitive change in neurologic populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic mixed-methods process was followed for the scale design and validation. Associations of CCS responses to demographics, mood, and fatigue were examined in 131 persons with multiple sclerosis. A total of 46 participants also completed a cognitive test battery. Correlations of test scores with CCS responses were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 17-item CCS showed good reliability and validity. Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure, with items reflecting change in (1) general cognition, (2) language and executive function, (3) external feedback, and (4) use of coping strategies. Positive relationships of CCS scores with fatigue, depression, and anxiety were observed. Correlations of CCS scores with cognitive test performance did not reach significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCS may be a useful cognitive outcome tool for treatment trials in neurologic populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"13524585241290102"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241290102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in neurologic diseases. Precise measurement of cognitive change over time is necessary for isolating disease-related patterns from normal age-related decline. Existing measures of subjective cognition, however, focus on present status. There is, to our knowledge, no currently available self-report measure of cognitive change. We therefore developed the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS), which assesses perceived cognitive change in neurologic populations.

Methods: A systematic mixed-methods process was followed for the scale design and validation. Associations of CCS responses to demographics, mood, and fatigue were examined in 131 persons with multiple sclerosis. A total of 46 participants also completed a cognitive test battery. Correlations of test scores with CCS responses were calculated.

Results: The 17-item CCS showed good reliability and validity. Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure, with items reflecting change in (1) general cognition, (2) language and executive function, (3) external feedback, and (4) use of coping strategies. Positive relationships of CCS scores with fatigue, depression, and anxiety were observed. Correlations of CCS scores with cognitive test performance did not reach significance.

Conclusion: The CCS may be a useful cognitive outcome tool for treatment trials in neurologic populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知变化量表(CCS)的开发和初步验证。
背景:认知障碍在神经系统疾病中很常见。要从正常的年龄衰退中分离出与疾病相关的模式,就必须对认知随时间的变化进行精确测量。然而,现有的主观认知测量主要针对目前的状态。据我们所知,目前还没有关于认知变化的自我报告测量方法。因此,我们开发了认知变化量表(CCS),用于评估神经系统患者的认知变化:方法:量表的设计和验证采用了系统的混合方法。对 131 名多发性硬化症患者的 CCS 反应与人口统计学、情绪和疲劳的关系进行了研究。共有 46 名参与者完成了认知测试。计算了测试得分与 CCS 反应的相关性:结果:17 个项目的 CCS 显示出良好的可靠性和有效性。探索性和确认性因素分析的结果支持四因素结构,项目反映了(1)一般认知、(2)语言和执行功能、(3)外部反馈和(4)应对策略使用方面的变化。CCS得分与疲劳、抑郁和焦虑呈正相关。CCS得分与认知测试成绩的相关性未达到显著水平:结论:CCS可能是神经系统患者治疗试验中一个有用的认知结果工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
期刊最新文献
Cryptogenic organising pneumonia in patients treated with ocrelizumab. Ocrelizumab-associated cryptogenic organizing pneumonia in multiple sclerosis: Two case reports and comprehensive literature review. Vaccination as a risk factor for pediatric multiple sclerosis: Insights from a retrospective case-control study. Secondary organising pneumonia associated to COVID-19 infection in patients with central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases treated with anti-CD20 therapies. Development and initial validation of the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1