Comparison of the ability between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis for diagnosing low skeletal muscle mass and sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16806
Yuki Tamura, Chisato Saeki, Tomoya Kanai, Sachie Kiryu, Masanori Nakano, Tsunekazu Oikawa, Yuichi Torisu, Masayuki Saruta, Akihito Tsubota
{"title":"Comparison of the ability between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis for diagnosing low skeletal muscle mass and sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.","authors":"Yuki Tamura, Chisato Saeki, Tomoya Kanai, Sachie Kiryu, Masanori Nakano, Tsunekazu Oikawa, Yuichi Torisu, Masayuki Saruta, Akihito Tsubota","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Sarcopenia and osteoporosis adversely impact the clinical outcomes of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) sarcopenia criteria utilize bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for assessing muscle mass rather than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which can simultaneously diagnose these comorbidities. We investigated the correlations and interchangeability between the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) values determined using BIA and DXA and evaluated the diagnostic ability of DXA for sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia in patients with CLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 173 patients with CLD. Sarcopenia was defined as low ASMI<sub>BIA</sub> according to the JSH and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria (ASMI<sub>BIA cutoff</sub>) or low ASMI<sub>DXA</sub> according to the AWGS criteria (ASMI<sub>DXA cutoff</sub>) and low handgrip strength. For women, a provisional cutoff value was set for ASMI<sub>DXA</sub> using the ASMI<sub>BIA cutoff</sub> (ASMI<sub>DXA-altered cutoff</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that ASMI<sub>BIA</sub> and ASMI<sub>DXA</sub> were significantly correlated (r = 0.921; P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated substantial agreement between ASMI<sub>BIA</sub> and ASMI<sub>DXA</sub>, with a mean difference of 0.0116 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The prevalence rates of sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia diagnosed using the ASMI<sub>BIA cutoff</sub> were 26.0% and 17.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficients for the prevalence of sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia were 0.759 and 0.775 between ASMI<sub>BIA cutoff</sub> and ASMI<sub>DXA cutoff</sub> and 0.780 and 0.806 between ASMI<sub>BIA cutoff</sub> and ASMI<sub>DXA-altered cutoff</sub>, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utilization of DXA can facilitate the comprehensive assessment and management of musculoskeletal comorbidities in patients with CLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis adversely impact the clinical outcomes of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) sarcopenia criteria utilize bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for assessing muscle mass rather than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which can simultaneously diagnose these comorbidities. We investigated the correlations and interchangeability between the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) values determined using BIA and DXA and evaluated the diagnostic ability of DXA for sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia in patients with CLD.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 173 patients with CLD. Sarcopenia was defined as low ASMIBIA according to the JSH and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria (ASMIBIA cutoff) or low ASMIDXA according to the AWGS criteria (ASMIDXA cutoff) and low handgrip strength. For women, a provisional cutoff value was set for ASMIDXA using the ASMIBIA cutoff (ASMIDXA-altered cutoff).

Results: We found that ASMIBIA and ASMIDXA were significantly correlated (r = 0.921; P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated substantial agreement between ASMIBIA and ASMIDXA, with a mean difference of 0.0116 kg/m2. The prevalence rates of sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia diagnosed using the ASMIBIA cutoff were 26.0% and 17.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficients for the prevalence of sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia were 0.759 and 0.775 between ASMIBIA cutoff and ASMIDXA cutoff and 0.780 and 0.806 between ASMIBIA cutoff and ASMIDXA-altered cutoff, respectively.

Conclusions: The utilization of DXA can facilitate the comprehensive assessment and management of musculoskeletal comorbidities in patients with CLD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较双能 X 射线吸收测量法和生物电阻抗分析法诊断慢性肝病患者骨骼肌质量低和肌肉疏松症的能力。
背景和目的:肌肉疏松症和骨质疏松症对慢性肝病(CLD)患者的临床预后产生不利影响。日本肝病学会(JSH)的肌肉疏松症标准采用生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)评估肌肉质量,而非双能 X 光吸收测定法(DXA),后者可同时诊断这些合并症。我们研究了用 BIA 和 DXA 测定的阑尾骨骼肌质量指数(ASMI)值之间的相关性和互换性,并评估了 DXA 对 CLD 患者肌少症和骨肉疏松症的诊断能力:这项横断面研究纳入了173名CLD患者。根据 JSH 和亚洲肌少症工作组(AWGS)的标准(ASMIBIA 临界值),肌少症被定义为低 ASMIBIA 或根据 AWGS 标准(ASMIDXA 临界值)定义为低 ASMIDXA 以及低握力。对于女性,则使用 ASMIBIA 临界值(ASMIDXA-altered 临界值)为 ASMIDXA 设定一个临时临界值:我们发现 ASMIBIA 和 ASMIDXA 显著相关(r = 0.921;P BIA 和 ASMIDXA 的平均差异为 0.0116 kg/m2)。使用 ASMIBIA 临界值诊断出的肌肉疏松症和骨关节疏松症患病率分别为 26.0% 和 17.3%。在 ASMIBIA 临界值与 ASMIDXA 临界值之间,肌肉疏松症和骨质疏松症患病率的卡帕系数分别为 0.759 和 0.775;在 ASMIBIA 临界值与 ASMIDXA 改良临界值之间,肌肉疏松症和骨质疏松症患病率的卡帕系数分别为 0.780 和 0.806:结论:利用 DXA 可以促进对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肌肉骨骼合并症进行全面评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Success Rate and Adverse Effects of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Versus Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in Large Common Bile Duct Stones Removal. A Propensity Scores Inverse Weighting Analysis. Incidence of Cholecystitis After Endoscopic Biliary Drainage Using a Low Axial Force Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent in Patients With Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study. PANoptosis-related genes: Molecular insights into immune dysregulation in ulcerative colitis. Bowel Colonization With Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria Is Associated With Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure. Cardiometabolic risk factors and coronary atherosclerosis progression in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: the influential role of quantity over type.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1