The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002931
Adam Boissonneault, Nathan N O'Hara, Gerard P Slobogean, Anna Meyer, Michael Maceroli, Marcus F Sciadini, Jason W Nascone, Mark J Gage, Jolinta Lin, Sheela Hanasoge, Jay Shelton, Zaker Rana, Mark Mishra, Robert V O'Toole
{"title":"The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Adam Boissonneault, Nathan N O'Hara, Gerard P Slobogean, Anna Meyer, Michael Maceroli, Marcus F Sciadini, Jason W Nascone, Mark J Gage, Jolinta Lin, Sheela Hanasoge, Jay Shelton, Zaker Rana, Mark Mishra, Robert V O'Toole","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of external beam radiation (XRT) on preventing severe heterotopic ossification (HO) after acetabular surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two level I academic trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with an acetabular fracture (OTA/AO type 62) surgically treated through a posterior or combined anterior and posterior approach.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Radiographic HO was determined using Brooker Classification at the last follow-up. The primary outcome was severe HO (Brooker class III-IV). The secondary outcome was any HO (Brooker class I-IV). The incidence of radiographic HO was compared between patients that did and did not undergo postoperative XRT. The results were analyzed in both an intention-to-treat (randomized to XRT) and as-treated (received XRT) basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Severe HO occurred in 3 of 54 (6%) patients randomized to XRT and 9 of 50 (18%) patients randomized to no XRT (odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.94; p=0.05). Any HO occurred in 10 (19%) patients assigned to XRT and 17 (34%) patients in the no XRT control group (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; p =0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this dual-center randomized controlled trial suggest that XRT after acetabular surgery significantly reduced the odds of severe HO compared to patients that did not receive XRT. These results can help guide shared decision-making between surgeons and patients regarding the use of XRT for HO prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, therapeutic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of external beam radiation (XRT) on preventing severe heterotopic ossification (HO) after acetabular surgery.

Methods: Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Two level I academic trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with an acetabular fracture (OTA/AO type 62) surgically treated through a posterior or combined anterior and posterior approach.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Radiographic HO was determined using Brooker Classification at the last follow-up. The primary outcome was severe HO (Brooker class III-IV). The secondary outcome was any HO (Brooker class I-IV). The incidence of radiographic HO was compared between patients that did and did not undergo postoperative XRT. The results were analyzed in both an intention-to-treat (randomized to XRT) and as-treated (received XRT) basis.

Results: Severe HO occurred in 3 of 54 (6%) patients randomized to XRT and 9 of 50 (18%) patients randomized to no XRT (odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.94; p=0.05). Any HO occurred in 10 (19%) patients assigned to XRT and 17 (34%) patients in the no XRT control group (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.05; p =0.07).

Conclusions: The findings of this dual-center randomized controlled trial suggest that XRT after acetabular surgery significantly reduced the odds of severe HO compared to patients that did not receive XRT. These results can help guide shared decision-making between surgeons and patients regarding the use of XRT for HO prophylaxis.

Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋臼骨折手术固定后使用体外放射治疗预防异位骨化:随机对照试验
目的确定外照射(XRT)对预防髋臼手术后严重异位骨化(HO)的影响:设计:随机对照试验:随机对照试验:患者选择标准:髋臼骨折患者:髋臼骨折(OTA/AO 62型)患者,通过后路或前后联合入路进行手术治疗:结果测量和比较:在最后一次随访时使用Brooker分类法确定放射学HO。主要结果为严重HO(Brooker分级III-IV)。次要结果为任何 HO(Brooker 分级 I-IV)。比较了术后接受和未接受 XRT 的患者的影像学 HO 发生率。结果以意向治疗(随机接受 XRT)和治疗后(接受 XRT)为基础进行分析:在随机接受 XRT 的 54 例患者中,有 3 例(6%)出现严重 HO;在随机不接受 XRT 的 50 例患者中,有 9 例(18%)出现严重 HO(几率比(OR)为 0.24,95% 置信区间(CI)为 0.05 至 0.94;P=0.05)。10例(19%)接受XRT治疗的患者和17例(34%)未接受XRT治疗的对照组患者发生了任何HO(OR为0.39;95% CI为0.13至1.05;P=0.07):这项双中心随机对照试验的结果表明,与未接受XRT的患者相比,髋臼手术后接受XRT可显著降低发生严重HO的几率。这些结果有助于指导外科医生和患者就使用XRT预防HO做出共同决策:I级,治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures? The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1