Synthesis of Functionalized Pyridine Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles for Utilization in Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction of Tebuconazole and Propiconazole Followed by Quantification via High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ultraviolet Detection
{"title":"Synthesis of Functionalized Pyridine Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles for Utilization in Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction of Tebuconazole and Propiconazole Followed by Quantification via High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ultraviolet Detection","authors":"Naghmeh Nikbakhsh, Milad Ghani, Behrooz Maleki","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the current study, a new magnetic sorbent (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>@2,6-diamino-4-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile) was prepared as a new and efficient sorbent to be used in the magnetic solid-phase extraction method to extract tebuconazole and propiconazole as model compounds. In this regard, effective parameters such as pH of the sample solution, desorption volume, ionic strength, extraction time, desorption time, and amount of the magnetic sorbent were optimized using experimental design. In the optimal condition, the linear dynamic ranges for tebuconazole and propiconazole were between 0.5 and 200.0 µg/L. Also, the limits of detection, limits of quantification, and relative standard deviations were 0.21–0.14 µg/L, 0.49–0.45 µg/L, and 1.3%–4.6%, respectively. The estimated enrichment factors for tebuconazole and propiconazole were 22 and 28, respectively. The absolute recovery (AR%) values for tebuconazole and propiconazole were also 67% and 84%, respectively. Finally, the proposed method was used for determination of tebuconazole and propiconazole in cucumber, tomato, orange, and lemon fruits. The obtained result confirmed that the presented method is capable for the analysis of the selected analytes in complicated matrices. In addition, the ARs% were in the range of 67%–84%. The result proved that the presented method can be an alternative to the extraction process of various pesticides.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the current study, a new magnetic sorbent (Fe3O4@2,6-diamino-4-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile) was prepared as a new and efficient sorbent to be used in the magnetic solid-phase extraction method to extract tebuconazole and propiconazole as model compounds. In this regard, effective parameters such as pH of the sample solution, desorption volume, ionic strength, extraction time, desorption time, and amount of the magnetic sorbent were optimized using experimental design. In the optimal condition, the linear dynamic ranges for tebuconazole and propiconazole were between 0.5 and 200.0 µg/L. Also, the limits of detection, limits of quantification, and relative standard deviations were 0.21–0.14 µg/L, 0.49–0.45 µg/L, and 1.3%–4.6%, respectively. The estimated enrichment factors for tebuconazole and propiconazole were 22 and 28, respectively. The absolute recovery (AR%) values for tebuconazole and propiconazole were also 67% and 84%, respectively. Finally, the proposed method was used for determination of tebuconazole and propiconazole in cucumber, tomato, orange, and lemon fruits. The obtained result confirmed that the presented method is capable for the analysis of the selected analytes in complicated matrices. In addition, the ARs% were in the range of 67%–84%. The result proved that the presented method can be an alternative to the extraction process of various pesticides.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.