An update on laboratory detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: Guidance from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.022
Katrien M J Devreese, Maria Laura Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Bas de Laat, Doruk Erkan, Emmanuel J Favaloro, Vittorio Pengo, Thomas L Ortel, Denis Wahl, Hannah Cohen
{"title":"An update on laboratory detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: Guidance from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies.","authors":"Katrien M J Devreese, Maria Laura Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Bas de Laat, Doruk Erkan, Emmanuel J Favaloro, Vittorio Pengo, Thomas L Ortel, Denis Wahl, Hannah Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>APS diagnosis is dependent on accurate detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) remain the cornerstone of the laboratory part of APS diagnosis. In the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria, the type of laboratory parameters remain essentially unchanged compared to the updated Sapporo classification criteria, and aCL and aβ2GPI antibody measurement is still restricted to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with moderate and high titer aPL thresholds defined as 40 and 80 units, respectively, and a cutoff calculated by the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile has been abandoned. We must differentiate between classification criteria and assessment of aPL in clinical care. Classification criteria are strict and meant for participant inclusion in studies and trials to study homogeneous populations of patients. In contrast, laboratory detection for APS diagnosis in daily practice is broader meant to diagnose each APS patient to optimize their management. Nowadays, there is increasing use of measurement of aPL by methods other than ELISA, the semiquantitative reporting of titers is a matter of debate, as well as the role of the isotypes IgM and IgA, and the role of other aPL, such as antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies. Patients diagnosed with the disease may or may not fulfill the classification criteria and inappropriate use of classification criteria may lead to mis(under)diagnosis. The aim of this guidance, based on literature and expert opinion, is to provide guidance recommendations for laboratory workers and clinicians, on routine diagnostic assessment of patients with suspected APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

APS diagnosis is dependent on accurate detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) remain the cornerstone of the laboratory part of APS diagnosis. In the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria, the type of laboratory parameters remain essentially unchanged compared to the updated Sapporo classification criteria, and aCL and aβ2GPI antibody measurement is still restricted to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with moderate and high titer aPL thresholds defined as 40 and 80 units, respectively, and a cutoff calculated by the 99th percentile has been abandoned. We must differentiate between classification criteria and assessment of aPL in clinical care. Classification criteria are strict and meant for participant inclusion in studies and trials to study homogeneous populations of patients. In contrast, laboratory detection for APS diagnosis in daily practice is broader meant to diagnose each APS patient to optimize their management. Nowadays, there is increasing use of measurement of aPL by methods other than ELISA, the semiquantitative reporting of titers is a matter of debate, as well as the role of the isotypes IgM and IgA, and the role of other aPL, such as antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies. Patients diagnosed with the disease may or may not fulfill the classification criteria and inappropriate use of classification criteria may lead to mis(under)diagnosis. The aim of this guidance, based on literature and expert opinion, is to provide guidance recommendations for laboratory workers and clinicians, on routine diagnostic assessment of patients with suspected APS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室检测和解读抗磷脂抗体以诊断抗磷脂综合征的最新进展:国际血栓与止血学会科学与标准化委员会(ISTH-SSC)狼疮抗凝物/抗磷脂抗体小组委员会的指南。
APS 诊断取决于抗磷脂抗体(aPL)的准确检测和判读。狼疮抗凝物(LA)、抗心磷脂抗体(aCL)和抗β2糖蛋白I抗体(aβ2GPI)仍然是APS诊断实验室部分的基石。在 2023 年 ACR/EULAR APS 分类标准中,实验室指标的类型与更新后的札幌分类标准相比基本未变,aCL 和 aβ2GPI 抗体的检测仍仅限于酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),中度和高滴度 aPL 临界值分别定义为 40 和 80 单位,并放弃了以第 99 百分位数计算的临界值。我们必须区分分类标准和临床护理中的 aPL 评估。分类标准是严格的,旨在将参与者纳入研究和试验,以研究同质的患者群体。与此相反,日常实践中用于诊断 APS 的实验室检测则更为宽泛,其目的是诊断每一位 APS 患者,以优化对他们的管理。如今,除 ELISA 外,越来越多地使用其他方法测量 APL,滴度的半定量报告、IgM 和 IgA 等异型的作用以及其他 APL(如抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原抗体)的作用也是一个争论不休的问题。被诊断为该病的患者可能符合分类标准,也可能不符合,而不适当地使用分类标准可能会导致误诊(漏诊)。本指南以文献和专家意见为基础,旨在为实验室工作人员和临床医生提供对疑似 APS 患者进行常规诊断评估的指导建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
期刊最新文献
An update on laboratory detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: Guidance from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies. The severe von Willebrand Disease variant p.M771V leads to impaired anterograde trafficking of Von Willebrand factor in patient-derived and base-edited ECFCs. Validating International Classification of Diseases Code 10th Revision algorithms for accurate identification of pulmonary embolism. High risk of long-term recurrence after a first episode of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: the REcurrence after a PrEgnAncy related Thrombosis (REPEAT) Study. Validation of clinical risk assessment scores for venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a population-based cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1