Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for pain management for veterans separating from military service: study protocol of a hybrid type 2 study testing implementation facilitation versus training-as-usual.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae062
John J Sellinger, Marc I Rosen, Christina M Lazar, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden, James Dziura, Fang-Yong Li, Kristin Mattocks, Adrienne Weede, Michael Sullivan-Tibbs, Liam Rose, Gabriela Garcia Vassallo, Ajay Manhapra, Amos Turner, Dawne Vogt, Eva N Woodward, Christine W Hartmann, Sally G Haskell, Amir Mohammad, Steve Martino
{"title":"Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for pain management for veterans separating from military service: study protocol of a hybrid type 2 study testing implementation facilitation versus training-as-usual.","authors":"John J Sellinger, Marc I Rosen, Christina M Lazar, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden, James Dziura, Fang-Yong Li, Kristin Mattocks, Adrienne Weede, Michael Sullivan-Tibbs, Liam Rose, Gabriela Garcia Vassallo, Ajay Manhapra, Amos Turner, Dawne Vogt, Eva N Woodward, Christine W Hartmann, Sally G Haskell, Amir Mohammad, Steve Martino","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterans transitioning to civilian life often have chronic pain from service-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) with higher risk for substance misuse. Many seek VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) compensation for MSD. Use of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Pain Management (SBIRT-PM) by VA Post-9/11 Military2VA (M2VA) case managers presents an opportunity to engage these veterans in VA pain care and address substance misuse. Implementation facilitation might help case managers use SBIRT-PM and engage veterans in services to improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a 2-cohort multisite cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. Within 2 separate cohorts of 14 VA sites each, sites will be allocated to receive an implementation strategy through the use of a constrained randomization procedure: virtual implementation facilitation or training-as-usual. Sites and M2VA case managers will receive the assigned implementation strategy to support use of SBIRT-PM. Recently discharged veterans (n = 1848) claiming service-connected MSD will be recruited, with case managers blind to veterans' study enrollment. The proportion of participants who receive any SBIRT-PM will be the primary implementation outcome. Veteran participants will complete baseline, 12-week, and 36-week assessments, irrespective of whether case managers conduct SBIRT-PM with them (intent-to-treat). Pain intensity and interference will be the primary clinical outcomes. The study emphasizes pragmatic over explanatory methodological features.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This pragmatic trial will examine implementation facilitation versus training-as-usual in implementing SBIRT-PM to promote veteran engagement in nonpharmacological pain services. Using innovative methods to train and support VA case managers in SBIRT-PM, study outcomes could have broad implications for case management systems of care across the VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S99-S106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Veterans transitioning to civilian life often have chronic pain from service-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) with higher risk for substance misuse. Many seek VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) compensation for MSD. Use of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Pain Management (SBIRT-PM) by VA Post-9/11 Military2VA (M2VA) case managers presents an opportunity to engage these veterans in VA pain care and address substance misuse. Implementation facilitation might help case managers use SBIRT-PM and engage veterans in services to improve outcomes.

Design: This study is a 2-cohort multisite cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. Within 2 separate cohorts of 14 VA sites each, sites will be allocated to receive an implementation strategy through the use of a constrained randomization procedure: virtual implementation facilitation or training-as-usual. Sites and M2VA case managers will receive the assigned implementation strategy to support use of SBIRT-PM. Recently discharged veterans (n = 1848) claiming service-connected MSD will be recruited, with case managers blind to veterans' study enrollment. The proportion of participants who receive any SBIRT-PM will be the primary implementation outcome. Veteran participants will complete baseline, 12-week, and 36-week assessments, irrespective of whether case managers conduct SBIRT-PM with them (intent-to-treat). Pain intensity and interference will be the primary clinical outcomes. The study emphasizes pragmatic over explanatory methodological features.

Summary: This pragmatic trial will examine implementation facilitation versus training-as-usual in implementing SBIRT-PM to promote veteran engagement in nonpharmacological pain services. Using innovative methods to train and support VA case managers in SBIRT-PM, study outcomes could have broad implications for case management systems of care across the VA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍老兵疼痛管理的筛查、简短干预和转诊治疗:混合型 2 类研究的研究方案,测试实施促进与常规培训的对比。
背景:过渡到平民生活的退伍军人通常会因服役相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)而产生慢性疼痛,并有较高的药物滥用风险。许多人因 MSD 而寻求退伍军人事务部(VA)的补偿。退伍军人事务部 Post-9/11 Military2VA (M2VA) 案例经理使用疼痛管理筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(SBIRT-PM)为这些退伍军人参与退伍军人事务部疼痛护理和解决药物滥用问题提供了机会。实施促进工作可帮助病例管理人员使用 SBIRT-PM 并让退伍军人参与服务,从而改善治疗效果:本研究是一项 2 个队列的多地点分组随机混合 2 型有效性实施试验。在由 14 个退伍军人医疗机构组成的 2 个独立队列中,各医疗机构将通过受限随机程序被分配接受一种实施策略:虚拟实施促进或常规培训。医疗点和 M2VA 案例经理将接受指定的实施策略,以支持 SBIRT-PM 的使用。我们将招募最近退伍的退伍老兵(n = 1848),他们声称自己因服役而患上了 MSD,病例管理员对退伍老兵的研究注册情况一无所知。接受任何 SBIRT-PM 的参与者比例将是主要的实施结果。退伍军人参与者将完成基线、12 周和 36 周评估,无论病例管理员是否对其进行 SBIRT-PM(意向治疗)。疼痛强度和干扰将是主要的临床结果。该研究强调实用性而非解释性的方法论特征。摘要:这项实用性试验将研究在实施 SBIRT-PM 以促进退伍军人参与非药物止痛服务时,实施促进与常规培训的对比情况。利用创新方法对退伍军人事务部的病例管理人员进行 SBIRT-PM 培训和支持,研究结果可能会对整个退伍军人事务部的病例管理系统产生广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomization study finds no evidence for causal effects of C-reactive protein (CRP) on chronic pain conditions. Pressure Pain Sensitivity is Independent of Structural Pathology in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Association of Opioid Tapering with Pain-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Primary Care Visits: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Proinflammatory Diet is Associated with Higher Pain, Disease Severity and Biochemical Parameters Associated with Inflammation in Fibromyalgia. Identifying factors associated with persistent opioid use after total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1