Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for the prediction of intubation in the intensive care unit.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-77798-5
Jianyuan Liu, Xiangjie Duan, Minjie Duan, Yu Jiang, Wei Mao, Lilin Wang, Gang Liu
{"title":"Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for the prediction of intubation in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Jianyuan Liu, Xiangjie Duan, Minjie Duan, Yu Jiang, Wei Mao, Lilin Wang, Gang Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-77798-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the limited capacity to accurately determine the necessity for intubation in intensive care unit settings, this study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model capable of predicting the need for intubation among ICU patients. Seven widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to construct the prediction models. Adult patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database who stayed in the ICU for longer than 24 h were included in the development and internal validation. The model was subsequently externally validated using the eICU-CRD database. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations method was employed to interpret the influence of individual parameters on the predictions made by the model. A total of 11,988 patients were included in the final cohort for this study. The CatBoost model demonstrated the best performance (AUC: 0.881). In the external validation set, the efficacy of our model was also confirmed (AUC: 0.750), which suggests robust generalization capabilities. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), body mass index (BMI), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory rate (RR) and length of stay (LOS) before ICU were the top 5 features of the CatBoost model with the greatest impact. We developed an externally validated CatBoost model that accurately predicts the need for intubation in ICU patients within 24 to 96 h of admission, facilitating clinical decision-making and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The prediction model utilizes readily obtainable monitoring parameters and integrates the SHAP method to enhance interpretability, providing clinicians with clear insights into the factors influencing predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77798-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the limited capacity to accurately determine the necessity for intubation in intensive care unit settings, this study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model capable of predicting the need for intubation among ICU patients. Seven widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to construct the prediction models. Adult patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database who stayed in the ICU for longer than 24 h were included in the development and internal validation. The model was subsequently externally validated using the eICU-CRD database. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations method was employed to interpret the influence of individual parameters on the predictions made by the model. A total of 11,988 patients were included in the final cohort for this study. The CatBoost model demonstrated the best performance (AUC: 0.881). In the external validation set, the efficacy of our model was also confirmed (AUC: 0.750), which suggests robust generalization capabilities. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), body mass index (BMI), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), respiratory rate (RR) and length of stay (LOS) before ICU were the top 5 features of the CatBoost model with the greatest impact. We developed an externally validated CatBoost model that accurately predicts the need for intubation in ICU patients within 24 to 96 h of admission, facilitating clinical decision-making and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The prediction model utilizes readily obtainable monitoring parameters and integrates the SHAP method to enhance interpretability, providing clinicians with clear insights into the factors influencing predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和外部验证用于预测重症监护室插管情况的可解释机器学习模型。
鉴于在重症监护室环境中准确判断插管必要性的能力有限,本研究旨在开发并从外部验证一种可解释的机器学习模型,该模型能够预测重症监护室患者插管的必要性。研究采用了七种广泛使用的机器学习(ML)算法来构建预测模型。开发和内部验证的对象包括来自重症监护医学信息中心IV数据库的、在重症监护病房住院超过24小时的成人患者。随后使用 eICU-CRD 数据库对模型进行了外部验证。此外,还采用了 SHapley Additive exPlanations 方法来解释各个参数对模型预测结果的影响。本研究的最终队列共纳入了 11,988 名患者。CatBoost 模型表现最佳(AUC:0.881)。在外部验证集中,我们的模型的有效性也得到了证实(AUC:0.750),这表明我们的模型具有强大的泛化能力。格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、体重指数(BMI)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、呼吸频率(RR)和 ICU 前住院时间(LOS)是 CatBoost 模型中影响最大的前 5 个特征。我们开发了一个经过外部验证的 CatBoost 模型,该模型能准确预测 ICU 患者在入院后 24 到 96 小时内的插管需求,有助于临床决策,并有可能改善患者的预后。该预测模型采用了易于获得的监测参数,并整合了 SHAP 方法以提高可解释性,让临床医生清楚地了解影响预测的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
A fuzzy-predictive current control with real-time hardware for PEM fuel cell systems. A hybrid local-global neural network for visual classification using raw EEG signals. Aging-related NADPH diaphorase positive neurodegenerations in the sacral spinal cord of aged non-human primates. Prediction of vancomycin plasma concentration in elderly patients based on multi-algorithm mining combined with population pharmacokinetics. Preservation of freshly-cut lemon slices using alginate-based coating functionalized with antioxidant enzymatically hydrolyzed rice straw-hemicellulose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1