Development and validation of a novel comorbidity score specific for prostate cancer patients treated with robotic platform and its implication on DaVinci single-port system.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02152-w
Donato Cannoletta, Elio Mazzone, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Greta Pettenuzzo, Matteo Pacini, Luca Lambertini, Antony Angelo Pellegrino, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Armando Stabile, Francesco Pellegrino, Giorgio Gandaglia, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea Minervini, Alessandro Antonelli, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"Development and validation of a novel comorbidity score specific for prostate cancer patients treated with robotic platform and its implication on DaVinci single-port system.","authors":"Donato Cannoletta, Elio Mazzone, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Greta Pettenuzzo, Matteo Pacini, Luca Lambertini, Antony Angelo Pellegrino, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Armando Stabile, Francesco Pellegrino, Giorgio Gandaglia, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea Minervini, Alessandro Antonelli, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02152-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop and validate a novel Comorbidity score for Robotic Surgery (CRS) in predicting severe complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of the surgical platform (Multi-Port - MP vs Single-Port - SP) according to this score. We included 2085 (\"development cohort\") and 595 (\"validation cohort\") patients undergoing RARP at two tertiary referral centers between 2014 and March 2024 in a retrospective study. Statistical analyses included validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict 30-day severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a), development and external validation of CRS using calibration plots and decision curve analysis. Lastly, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) analysis was used to graphically explore the impact of the robotic platform according to novel CRS. CCI exhibited limited predictive ability for severe complications (60% in the validation cohort). In multivariable logistic regression analyses testing the correlation between each condition included in CCI and severe complications, diabetes and myocardial infarction resulted as independent predictors (OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05-2.82]; OR 1.92 [95%CI 1.26-2.88]) and were subsequently fitted into a multivariable logistic model including age, previous abdominal surgery and obesity (BMI > 30). The resulting predictive model demonstrated superior discrimination and clinical net benefit in predicting severe complications compared to CCI (AUC 64 vs 60%). At LOWESS analysis, SP platform was associated with lower risk of severe complications as CRS increased compared to MP system. The validated CRS showed better accuracy compared to CCI in predicting severe complications after RARP. Additionally, the use of SP robotic platform may reduce the risk of severe complications in highly comorbid patients according to CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02152-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop and validate a novel Comorbidity score for Robotic Surgery (CRS) in predicting severe complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of the surgical platform (Multi-Port - MP vs Single-Port - SP) according to this score. We included 2085 ("development cohort") and 595 ("validation cohort") patients undergoing RARP at two tertiary referral centers between 2014 and March 2024 in a retrospective study. Statistical analyses included validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict 30-day severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a), development and external validation of CRS using calibration plots and decision curve analysis. Lastly, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) analysis was used to graphically explore the impact of the robotic platform according to novel CRS. CCI exhibited limited predictive ability for severe complications (60% in the validation cohort). In multivariable logistic regression analyses testing the correlation between each condition included in CCI and severe complications, diabetes and myocardial infarction resulted as independent predictors (OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05-2.82]; OR 1.92 [95%CI 1.26-2.88]) and were subsequently fitted into a multivariable logistic model including age, previous abdominal surgery and obesity (BMI > 30). The resulting predictive model demonstrated superior discrimination and clinical net benefit in predicting severe complications compared to CCI (AUC 64 vs 60%). At LOWESS analysis, SP platform was associated with lower risk of severe complications as CRS increased compared to MP system. The validated CRS showed better accuracy compared to CCI in predicting severe complications after RARP. Additionally, the use of SP robotic platform may reduce the risk of severe complications in highly comorbid patients according to CRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对使用机器人平台治疗的前列腺癌患者的新型合并症评分的开发和验证及其对 DaVinci 单孔系统的影响。
开发并验证一种新型机器人手术并发症评分(Comorbidity score for Robotic Surgery,CRS),用于预测机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)后的严重并发症。此外,我们还根据该评分研究了手术平台(多端口 - MP 与单端口 - SP)的影响。我们在一项回顾性研究中纳入了 2014 年至 2024 年 3 月间在两个三级转诊中心接受 RARP 手术的 2085 名("开发队列")和 595 名("验证队列")患者。统计分析包括验证夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)以预测 30 天严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a),使用校准图和决策曲线分析开发 CRS 并进行外部验证。最后,利用局部加权散点图平滑(LOWESS)分析,以图形方式探讨机器人平台对新型 CRS 的影响。CCI对严重并发症的预测能力有限(验证队列中为60%)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,糖尿病和心肌梗死是独立的预测因素(OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05-2.82];OR 1.92 [95%CI 1.26-2.88]),随后被纳入包括年龄、既往腹部手术和肥胖(BMI > 30)在内的多变量逻辑模型中。由此得出的预测模型在预测严重并发症方面的辨别力和临床净效益均优于 CCI(AUC 64 vs 60%)。在 LOWESS 分析中,与 MP 系统相比,随着 CRS 的增加,SP 平台与较低的严重并发症风险相关。与CCI相比,经过验证的CRS在预测RARP术后严重并发症方面显示出更高的准确性。此外,根据CRS,使用SP机器人平台可降低高合并症患者出现严重并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
A review of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patient reported health related quality of life outcomes after viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue placement directly over spared neurovascular bundles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1