Visual cues of soft-tissue behaviour in minimal-invasive and robotic surgery.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02150-y
Robin Julia Trute, Afshin Alijani, Mustafa Suphi Erden
{"title":"Visual cues of soft-tissue behaviour in minimal-invasive and robotic surgery.","authors":"Robin Julia Trute, Afshin Alijani, Mustafa Suphi Erden","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02150-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimal-invasive surgery (MIS) and robotic surgery (RS) offer multiple advantages over open surgery (Vajsbaher et al. in Cogn Syst Res 64:08, 2020). However, the lack of haptic feedback is still a limitation. Surgeons learn to adapt to this lack of haptic feedback using visual cues to make judgements about tissue deformation. Experienced robotic surgeons use the visual interpretation of tissue as a surrogate for tactile feedback. The aim of this review is to identify the visual cues that are consciously or unconsciously used by expert surgeons to manipulate soft tissue safely during Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) and Robotic Surgery (RS). We have conducted a comprehensive literature review with papers on visual cue identification and their application in education, as well as skill assessment and surgeon performance measurement with respect to visual feedback. To visualise our results, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in the form of a matrix across identified research features, where papers are clustered and grouped in a comparative way. The clustering of the papers showed explicitly that state-of-the-art research does not in particular study the direct effects of visual cues in relation to the manipulation of the tissue and training for that purpose, but is more concentrated on tissue identification. We identified a gap in the literature about the use of visual cues for educational design solutions, that aid the training of soft-tissue manipulation in MIS and in RS. There appears to be a need RS education to make visual cue identification more accessible and set it in the context of manipulation tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02150-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimal-invasive surgery (MIS) and robotic surgery (RS) offer multiple advantages over open surgery (Vajsbaher et al. in Cogn Syst Res 64:08, 2020). However, the lack of haptic feedback is still a limitation. Surgeons learn to adapt to this lack of haptic feedback using visual cues to make judgements about tissue deformation. Experienced robotic surgeons use the visual interpretation of tissue as a surrogate for tactile feedback. The aim of this review is to identify the visual cues that are consciously or unconsciously used by expert surgeons to manipulate soft tissue safely during Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) and Robotic Surgery (RS). We have conducted a comprehensive literature review with papers on visual cue identification and their application in education, as well as skill assessment and surgeon performance measurement with respect to visual feedback. To visualise our results, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in the form of a matrix across identified research features, where papers are clustered and grouped in a comparative way. The clustering of the papers showed explicitly that state-of-the-art research does not in particular study the direct effects of visual cues in relation to the manipulation of the tissue and training for that purpose, but is more concentrated on tissue identification. We identified a gap in the literature about the use of visual cues for educational design solutions, that aid the training of soft-tissue manipulation in MIS and in RS. There appears to be a need RS education to make visual cue identification more accessible and set it in the context of manipulation tasks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创手术和机器人手术中软组织行为的视觉提示。
与开放手术相比,微创手术(MIS)和机器人手术(RS)具有多种优势(Vajsbaher 等人,发表于 Cogn Syst Res 64:08,2020 年)。然而,缺乏触觉反馈仍是一个局限。外科医生要学会适应这种缺乏触觉反馈的情况,利用视觉线索对组织变形做出判断。经验丰富的机器人外科医生使用组织的视觉解读来替代触觉反馈。本综述旨在确定专家外科医生在微创手术(MIS)和机器人手术(RS)中安全操作软组织时有意识或无意识使用的视觉线索。我们对有关视觉线索识别、其在教育中的应用、技能评估和外科医生在视觉反馈方面的表现测量的论文进行了全面的文献综述。为了使我们的研究成果可视化,我们以矩阵的形式提供了最新研究成果的概览,并对已识别的研究特征进行了比较和分组。对论文的分组明确显示,最先进的研究并没有特别研究视觉提示对组织操作和训练的直接影响,而是更集中于组织识别。我们在文献中发现了一个空白点,即如何将视觉提示用于教育设计方案,以帮助在 MIS 和 RS 中进行软组织操作培训。看来需要进行 RS 教育,使视觉线索识别更易于理解,并将其设置为操作任务的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
A review of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patient reported health related quality of life outcomes after viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue placement directly over spared neurovascular bundles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1