"Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.09.006
Kathryn Crofton, Rachel Flink-Bochacki, Brooke Zaiz, Johanna Bringley
{"title":"\"Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like\": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions.","authors":"Kathryn Crofton, Rachel Flink-Bochacki, Brooke Zaiz, Johanna Bringley","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical students value abortion education; however, there has been little study regarding participation in second-trimester procedures, which are less common yet receive significant societal attention. We aimed to explore medical students' perceptions of participation in second-trimester procedural abortions to optimize this educational experience.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with third- and fourth-year medical students who voluntarily participated in second-trimester dilation and evacuation cases. We coded interviews inductively and performed thematic content analysis until thematic saturation was reached.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We interviewed 25 medical students, including 16 third-year and nine fourth-year students. Most participants were female (64%) and white (58%) and had no prior abortion care experience (80%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: 1) students felt unprepared for second-trimester procedural abortions and were unable to find adequate educational resources for preparation; 2) students experienced complex emotional reactions to the procedures, often finding the experience more challenging than expected; 3) students observed implicit expectations and biases in the learning environment; and 4) students highly valued their involvement in abortion procedures, noting that participation was important for their future practice and allowed acquisition of essential clinical skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students value the educational opportunity to participate in second-trimester procedural abortions; however, most feel unprepared for the technical and emotional aspects, despite utilizing available educational resources. To maximize educational experience and psychological safety, educators should develop specialized training resources. This could strengthen physician knowledge and comfort with abortion care in the future, ultimately improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2024.09.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medical students value abortion education; however, there has been little study regarding participation in second-trimester procedures, which are less common yet receive significant societal attention. We aimed to explore medical students' perceptions of participation in second-trimester procedural abortions to optimize this educational experience.

Study design: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with third- and fourth-year medical students who voluntarily participated in second-trimester dilation and evacuation cases. We coded interviews inductively and performed thematic content analysis until thematic saturation was reached.

Participants: We interviewed 25 medical students, including 16 third-year and nine fourth-year students. Most participants were female (64%) and white (58%) and had no prior abortion care experience (80%).

Results: Four major themes emerged: 1) students felt unprepared for second-trimester procedural abortions and were unable to find adequate educational resources for preparation; 2) students experienced complex emotional reactions to the procedures, often finding the experience more challenging than expected; 3) students observed implicit expectations and biases in the learning environment; and 4) students highly valued their involvement in abortion procedures, noting that participation was important for their future practice and allowed acquisition of essential clinical skills.

Conclusions: Medical students value the educational opportunity to participate in second-trimester procedural abortions; however, most feel unprepared for the technical and emotional aspects, despite utilizing available educational resources. To maximize educational experience and psychological safety, educators should develop specialized training resources. This could strengthen physician knowledge and comfort with abortion care in the future, ultimately improving patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"双方都不知道......堕胎是什么样子":医学生对第二孕期程序性流产经历的定性分析》。
目的:医学生重视人工流产教育;然而,有关参与第二孕期人工流产手术的研究却很少,因为这种手术并不常见,但却受到社会的广泛关注。我们旨在探讨医学生对参与第二孕期程序性流产的看法,以优化这一教育体验:研究设计:我们对自愿参与第二孕期扩张和排空手术的三年级和四年级医学生进行了半结构化定性访谈。我们对访谈进行了归纳编码,并进行了主题内容分析,直至达到主题饱和:我们对 25 名医学生进行了访谈,其中包括 16 名三年级学生和 9 名四年级学生。大多数参与者为女性(64%)和白人(58%),之前没有人工流产护理经验(80%):结果:出现了四大主题:1)学生对第二孕期的程序性人工流产感到毫无准备,并且无法找到足够的教育资源进行准备;2)学生对人工流产过程经历了复杂的情绪反应,往往发现这种经历比预期更具挑战性;3)学生观察到学习环境中存在隐含的期望和偏见;以及 4)学生高度重视参与人工流产过程,指出参与人工流产过程对他们未来的实践非常重要,并且可以获得基本的临床技能:结论:医科学生重视参与第二孕期程序性人工流产的教育机会;然而,尽管利用了现有的教育资源,大多数学生仍感到在技术和情感方面准备不足。为了最大限度地提高教育体验和心理安全,教育者应开发专门的培训资源。这可以加强医生对人工流产护理的了解和舒适度,最终改善对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Community-dwelling Black Women's Experiences With Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. "Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions. A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1