Increased memory confidence and delusions in Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocase Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1080/13554794.2024.2426267
Emma McLachlan, Kathy Liu, Lauren Huzzey, Neil Burgess, Suzanne Reeves, Robert Howard
{"title":"Increased memory confidence and delusions in Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study.","authors":"Emma McLachlan, Kathy Liu, Lauren Huzzey, Neil Burgess, Suzanne Reeves, Robert Howard","doi":"10.1080/13554794.2024.2426267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is uncertainty about whether delusion formation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be explained by false memories. \"Metamemory,\" the ability to self-evaluate memory and identify memory errors, is impaired in people with delusions in schizophrenia. Our objective was to investigate whether false memory and metamemory were associated with delusions in AD. Participants with mild AD, with and without delusions, completed a computerized word recognition task and a metamemory measure. Group differences were compared using independent-samples t-tests or Mann Whitney tests. Significant findings were explored through binary logistic regression modeling. Participants with delusions (<i>n</i> = 10) gave more high confidence responses, significantly so for correct responses; percentage of high confidence correct responses for those with delusions (mean (SD)) was 69.7% (31.0%) and for those without (<i>n</i> = 14) was 43.5% (29.9%); <i>t</i><sub>22</sub> = -2.09, <i>p</i> = .049. This remained significant when sex was included in regression modeling; for each 1.0% increase in high confidence correct responses, participants were 5.4% more likely to have delusions (Exp(β) 1.054, 95% CI 1.007-1.105, <i>p</i> = .025). Findings provide tentative support for a link between metamemory and delusions in AD. This should be explored in a larger sample as it has potential implications for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49762,"journal":{"name":"Neurocase","volume":" ","pages":"142-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocase","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2024.2426267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is uncertainty about whether delusion formation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be explained by false memories. "Metamemory," the ability to self-evaluate memory and identify memory errors, is impaired in people with delusions in schizophrenia. Our objective was to investigate whether false memory and metamemory were associated with delusions in AD. Participants with mild AD, with and without delusions, completed a computerized word recognition task and a metamemory measure. Group differences were compared using independent-samples t-tests or Mann Whitney tests. Significant findings were explored through binary logistic regression modeling. Participants with delusions (n = 10) gave more high confidence responses, significantly so for correct responses; percentage of high confidence correct responses for those with delusions (mean (SD)) was 69.7% (31.0%) and for those without (n = 14) was 43.5% (29.9%); t22 = -2.09, p = .049. This remained significant when sex was included in regression modeling; for each 1.0% increase in high confidence correct responses, participants were 5.4% more likely to have delusions (Exp(β) 1.054, 95% CI 1.007-1.105, p = .025). Findings provide tentative support for a link between metamemory and delusions in AD. This should be explored in a larger sample as it has potential implications for treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默氏症患者记忆信心增强和妄想:一项初步研究。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)妄想的形成是否可以用虚假记忆来解释,这一点尚不确定。"元记忆",即自我评估记忆和识别记忆错误的能力,在精神分裂症妄想症患者中受损。我们的目的是研究虚假记忆和元记忆是否与注意力缺失症患者的妄想有关。轻度注意力缺失症患者、有妄想症者和无妄想症者完成了一项计算机化单词识别任务和一项元记忆测量。采用独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼检验比较组间差异。重大发现则通过二元逻辑回归模型进行探讨。有妄想症的参与者(n = 10)给出了更多的高置信度回答,而且正确率显著提高;有妄想症的参与者(平均值(SD))的高置信度正确率为 69.7% (31.0%),而无妄想症的参与者(n = 14)的高置信度正确率为 43.5% (29.9%);t22 = -2.09,p = .049。当将性别纳入回归模型时,这一结果仍具有重要意义;高置信度正确回答每增加 1.0%,参与者出现妄想的可能性就增加 5.4%(Exp(β) 1.054, 95% CI 1.007-1.105, p = .025)。研究结果初步证明了元记忆与注意力缺失症妄想之间的联系。由于这对治疗有潜在影响,因此应在更大样本中进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocase
Neurocase 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocase is a rapid response journal of case studies and innovative group studies in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology that speak to the neural basis of cognition. Four types of manuscript are considered for publication: single case investigations that bear directly on issues of relevance to theoretical issues or brain-behavior relationships; group studies of subjects with brain dysfunction that address issues relevant to the understanding of human cognition; reviews of important topics in the domains of neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology; and brief reports (up to 2500 words) that replicate previous reports dealing with issues of considerable significance. Of particular interest are investigations that include precise anatomical localization of lesions or neural activity via imaging or other techniques, as well as studies of patients with neurodegenerative diseases, since these diseases are becoming more common as our population ages. Topic reviews are included in most issues.
期刊最新文献
A case of developmental topographical disorientation: impact on diagnostic trajectory and everyday life. Dentatorubral pallidoluysian atrophy with cognitive impairment, epilepsy, movement disorders, and psychosis - a case. Cotard's: a controlled single case study of putative perceptual, cognitive and psychological risk factors. Heterozygous p62/SQSTM1 mutation and right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia: Α case report. Inner dialogue dysfunction and the abusive comments of the dominant hemisphere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1