Accuracy of machine learning in diagnosing microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105685
Yuou Ying, Ruyi Ju, Jieyi Wang, Wenkai Li, Yuan Ji, Zhenyu Shi, Jinhan Chen, Mingxian Chen
{"title":"Accuracy of machine learning in diagnosing microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuou Ying, Ruyi Ju, Jieyi Wang, Wenkai Li, Yuan Ji, Zhenyu Shi, Jinhan Chen, Mingxian Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Significant challenges persist in the early identification of microsatellite instability (MSI) within current clinical practice. In recent years, with the growing utilization of machine learning (ML) in the diagnosis and management of gastric cancer (GC), numerous researchers have explored the effectiveness of ML methodologies in detecting MSI. Nevertheless, the predictive value of these approaches still lacks comprehensive evidence. Accordingly, this study was carried out to consolidate the accuracy of ML in the prompt detection of MSI in GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Embase were retrieved up to March 20, 2024. The risk of bias in the encompassed studies was evaluated utilizing a risk assessment tool for predictive models. Models were then subjected to subgroup analysis based on the modeling variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies, encompassing 11,912 patients with GC, satisfied the predefined inclusion criteria. ML models established in these studies were primarily based on pathological images, clinical features, and radiomics. The results suggested that in the validation sets, the pathological image-based models had a synthesized c-index of 0.86 [95 % CI (0.83-0.89)], with sensitivity and specificity being 0.86 [95 % CI (0.76-0.92)] and 0.83 [95 % CI (0.78-0.87)], respectively; radiomics feature-based models achieved respective values of 0.87 [95 % CI (0.81-0.92)], 0.77 [95 % CI (0.70-0.83)] and 0.81 [95 % CI (0.74-0.87)]; radiomics feature-based models + clinical feature-based models achieved respective values of 0.87 [95 % CI (0.81-0.93)], 0.78 [95 % CI (0.70-0.84)] and 0.79 [95 % CI (0.69-0.86)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML has demonstrated optimal performance in detecting MSI in GC and could serve as a prospective early adjunctive detection tool for MSI in GC. Future research should contemplate minimally invasive or non-invasive, readily collectible, and efficient predictors to augment the predictive accuracy of ML.</p>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Significant challenges persist in the early identification of microsatellite instability (MSI) within current clinical practice. In recent years, with the growing utilization of machine learning (ML) in the diagnosis and management of gastric cancer (GC), numerous researchers have explored the effectiveness of ML methodologies in detecting MSI. Nevertheless, the predictive value of these approaches still lacks comprehensive evidence. Accordingly, this study was carried out to consolidate the accuracy of ML in the prompt detection of MSI in GC.

Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Embase were retrieved up to March 20, 2024. The risk of bias in the encompassed studies was evaluated utilizing a risk assessment tool for predictive models. Models were then subjected to subgroup analysis based on the modeling variables.

Results: A total of 12 studies, encompassing 11,912 patients with GC, satisfied the predefined inclusion criteria. ML models established in these studies were primarily based on pathological images, clinical features, and radiomics. The results suggested that in the validation sets, the pathological image-based models had a synthesized c-index of 0.86 [95 % CI (0.83-0.89)], with sensitivity and specificity being 0.86 [95 % CI (0.76-0.92)] and 0.83 [95 % CI (0.78-0.87)], respectively; radiomics feature-based models achieved respective values of 0.87 [95 % CI (0.81-0.92)], 0.77 [95 % CI (0.70-0.83)] and 0.81 [95 % CI (0.74-0.87)]; radiomics feature-based models + clinical feature-based models achieved respective values of 0.87 [95 % CI (0.81-0.93)], 0.78 [95 % CI (0.70-0.84)] and 0.79 [95 % CI (0.69-0.86)].

Conclusions: ML has demonstrated optimal performance in detecting MSI in GC and could serve as a prospective early adjunctive detection tool for MSI in GC. Future research should contemplate minimally invasive or non-invasive, readily collectible, and efficient predictors to augment the predictive accuracy of ML.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习诊断胃癌微卫星不稳定性的准确性:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景:在目前的临床实践中,早期识别微卫星不稳定性(MSI)仍然面临着巨大挑战。近年来,随着机器学习(ML)在胃癌(GC)诊断和管理中的应用日益广泛,许多研究人员探索了 ML 方法在检测 MSI 方面的有效性。然而,这些方法的预测价值仍缺乏全面的证据。因此,本研究旨在巩固 ML 在及时检测 GC 中 MSI 方面的准确性:方法:检索了截至 2024 年 3 月 20 日的 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Embase。利用预测模型风险评估工具对所含研究的偏倚风险进行评估。然后根据建模变量对模型进行分组分析:共有 12 项研究符合预定的纳入标准,涵盖 11,912 名 GC 患者。这些研究建立的 ML 模型主要基于病理图像、临床特征和放射组学。结果表明,在验证集中,基于病理图像的模型的综合 c 指数为 0.86 [95 % CI (0.83-0.89)],灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.86 [95 % CI (0.76-0.92)] 和 0.83 [95 % CI (0.78-0.87)];基于放射组学特征的模型的综合 c 指数分别为 0.87[95%CI(0.81-0.92)]、0.77[95%CI(0.70-0.83)]和0.81[95%CI(0.74-0.87)];基于放射组学特征的模型+基于临床特征的模型分别达到0.87[95%CI(0.81-0.93)]、0.78[95%CI(0.70-0.84)]和0.79[95%CI(0.69-0.86)]:ML在检测GC中的MSI方面表现出最佳性能,可作为GC中MSI的前瞻性早期辅助检测工具。未来的研究应考虑采用微创或无创、易于收集和高效的预测指标来提高ML的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced NSCLC subtyping and staging through attention-augmented multi-task deep learning: A novel diagnostic tool. Application of the openEHR reference model for PGHD: A case study on the DH-Convener initiative Tracking provenance in clinical data warehouses for quality management Accuracy of machine learning in diagnosing microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1