Validation of the European French Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-Vf).

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.021
Timothy Pommée, Margaux Shanks, Dominique Morsomme, Sandrine Michel, Ingrid Verduyckt
{"title":"Validation of the European French Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V<sub>f</sub>).","authors":"Timothy Pommée, Margaux Shanks, Dominique Morsomme, Sandrine Michel, Ingrid Verduyckt","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to validate the French adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V<sub>f</sub>) for assessing voice disorders in France. The CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> addresses limitations of the GRBAS by providing a more sensitive, standardized approach to evaluating six vocal parameters (overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on three tasks (sustained vowels, sentence reading, and spontaneous speech). The study focused on investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as the convergent and discriminant validity of the CAPE-V<sub>f</sub>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four dysphonic and seven euphonic native French speakers participated in the study. Thirteen speech-language pathologists from France evaluated the voice samples using both the CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> and GRBAS tools at a one-week interval. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while convergent and discriminant validity were measured by correlating CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> with GRBAS and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> showed good intra-rater reliability for overall severity (mean ICC: 0.89), strain (ICC: 0.83), and pitch (ICC: 0.88), while roughness, breathiness, and loudness exhibited moderate reliability. Inter-rater reliability was low for most parameters, except overall severity, which demonstrated good reliability (mean ICC: 0.77). Strong correlations were observed between CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> and GRBAS Grade (mean r: 0.84), supporting its convergent validity. Moderate correlations were found for roughness, breathiness, and strain. The CAPE-V<sub>f</sub>'s correlation with the VHI was moderate (mean r: 0.53), reflecting its discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> is a valid and reliable tool for perceptual assessment of voice disorders in French-speaking populations, with stronger psychometric properties than the GRBAS, particularly for intra-rater reliability and overall severity. While inter-rater reliability was lower, qualitative feedback suggested that improvements to the protocol, particularly for pitch and loudness ratings, could enhance its clinical applicability. The findings support the CAPE-V<sub>f</sub> as a comprehensive tool for standardized clinical voice assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to validate the French adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-Vf) for assessing voice disorders in France. The CAPE-Vf addresses limitations of the GRBAS by providing a more sensitive, standardized approach to evaluating six vocal parameters (overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on three tasks (sustained vowels, sentence reading, and spontaneous speech). The study focused on investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as the convergent and discriminant validity of the CAPE-Vf.

Methods: Thirty-four dysphonic and seven euphonic native French speakers participated in the study. Thirteen speech-language pathologists from France evaluated the voice samples using both the CAPE-Vf and GRBAS tools at a one-week interval. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while convergent and discriminant validity were measured by correlating CAPE-Vf with GRBAS and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores, respectively.

Results: The CAPE-Vf showed good intra-rater reliability for overall severity (mean ICC: 0.89), strain (ICC: 0.83), and pitch (ICC: 0.88), while roughness, breathiness, and loudness exhibited moderate reliability. Inter-rater reliability was low for most parameters, except overall severity, which demonstrated good reliability (mean ICC: 0.77). Strong correlations were observed between CAPE-Vf and GRBAS Grade (mean r: 0.84), supporting its convergent validity. Moderate correlations were found for roughness, breathiness, and strain. The CAPE-Vf's correlation with the VHI was moderate (mean r: 0.53), reflecting its discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The CAPE-Vf is a valid and reliable tool for perceptual assessment of voice disorders in French-speaking populations, with stronger psychometric properties than the GRBAS, particularly for intra-rater reliability and overall severity. While inter-rater reliability was lower, qualitative feedback suggested that improvements to the protocol, particularly for pitch and loudness ratings, could enhance its clinical applicability. The findings support the CAPE-Vf as a comprehensive tool for standardized clinical voice assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲法文版嗓音听觉知觉评估共识(CAPE-Vf)的验证。
研究目的本研究旨在验证嗓音听觉知觉评估共识(CAPE-Vf)在法国的适应性,以评估法国的嗓音疾病。CAPE-Vf 解决了 GRBAS 的局限性,在三项任务(持续元音、句子朗读和自发言语)中提供了一种更灵敏、更标准化的方法来评估六项嗓音参数(整体严重程度、粗糙度、呼吸感、应变、音高和响度)。研究重点是调查 CAPE-Vf 的评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性,以及收敛性和区分性有效性:34 名发音困难的母语为法语的人和 7 名发音正常的人参加了研究。来自法国的 13 位语言病理学家每隔一周使用 CAPE-Vf 和 GRBAS 工具对语音样本进行评估。使用类内相关系数(ICC)计算了评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性,而通过将 CAPE-Vf 与 GRBAS 和嗓音障碍指数(VHI)的得分进行相关性分析,则测量了收敛性和鉴别性:CAPE-Vf 在总体严重程度(平均 ICC:0.89)、应变(ICC:0.83)和音调(ICC:0.88)方面表现出良好的评分者内部可靠性,而粗糙度、呼吸感和响度则表现出中等可靠性。除总体严重程度具有良好的可靠性(平均 ICC:0.77)外,大多数参数的评分者间可靠性较低。CAPE-Vf 与 GRBAS 分级之间存在很强的相关性(平均 r:0.84),支持其收敛有效性。粗糙度、呼吸感和应变之间的相关性适中。CAPE-Vf 与 VHI 的相关性为中等(平均 r:0.53),反映了其鉴别有效性:结论:CAPE-Vf 是一种有效、可靠的嗓音障碍感知评估工具,与 GRBAS 相比具有更强的心理测量特性,尤其是在评分者内部可靠性和总体严重程度方面。虽然评分者之间的可靠性较低,但定性反馈表明,改进方案(尤其是音高和响度评分)可提高其临床适用性。研究结果支持将 CAPE-Vf 作为标准化临床嗓音评估的综合工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Singing-Based Therapy on Voice Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Effects of Voice Therapy on Maximum Phonation Time and S:Z Ratio in Patients With Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia. Validation of the European French Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-Vf). Does the Daily Practice of a Structured Voice Exercise Protocol Affect the Fitness Instructor's Self-Perceived Vocal Effort, Vocal Fatigue, and Voice Handicap? Vocal Effort in Clinical Settings of North and South American Countries: Characterization From Argentinian, Chilean, Colombian, and the United States Clinician's Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1