Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer: esophagectomy remains a viable option.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae099
Chia Liu, Tien-Li Lan, Ping-Chung Tsai, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Pin-I Huang, Po-Kuei Hsu
{"title":"Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer: esophagectomy remains a viable option.","authors":"Chia Liu, Tien-Li Lan, Ping-Chung Tsai, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Pin-I Huang, Po-Kuei Hsu","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in patients with a history of cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires a careful evaluation of esophagectomy due to concerns regarding complications and prognosis. This study evaluates the periesophagectomy and oncological outcomes of such patients. Patients diagnosed with ESCC between January 2010 and August 2023 and who had undergone esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of a history of radiotherapy for as HNC. After 1: 2 propensity score matching, the perioperative and oncological outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were evaluated. A total of 481 patients, 32 in group 1 and 449 in group 2, were included. After matching, group 1 patients and 64 patients in the group 2 were analyzed. All the patients in group 1 were males, and their mean age was 56 years. The median radiation dose was 69 Gy. The rates of anastomosis leakage, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and reoperation were comparable between the two groups. However, vocal cord palsy occurred more frequently in group 1, particularly in those with recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection (37.5%). The 3-year OS (69.6% vs. 75.2%; p = 0.26) and RFS (50.8% vs. 55.9%; p = 0.63) were similar between groups 1 and 2. In conclusion, perioperative and oncological outcomes were comparable between ESCC patients with and without prior HNC radiotherapy, supporting esophagectomy as a feasible option.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in patients with a history of cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires a careful evaluation of esophagectomy due to concerns regarding complications and prognosis. This study evaluates the periesophagectomy and oncological outcomes of such patients. Patients diagnosed with ESCC between January 2010 and August 2023 and who had undergone esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of a history of radiotherapy for as HNC. After 1: 2 propensity score matching, the perioperative and oncological outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were evaluated. A total of 481 patients, 32 in group 1 and 449 in group 2, were included. After matching, group 1 patients and 64 patients in the group 2 were analyzed. All the patients in group 1 were males, and their mean age was 56 years. The median radiation dose was 69 Gy. The rates of anastomosis leakage, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and reoperation were comparable between the two groups. However, vocal cord palsy occurred more frequently in group 1, particularly in those with recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection (37.5%). The 3-year OS (69.6% vs. 75.2%; p = 0.26) and RFS (50.8% vs. 55.9%; p = 0.63) were similar between groups 1 and 2. In conclusion, perioperative and oncological outcomes were comparable between ESCC patients with and without prior HNC radiotherapy, supporting esophagectomy as a feasible option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头颈部癌症颈部放疗后食管鳞状细胞癌的处理:食管切除术仍是可行的选择。
由于对并发症和预后的担忧,治疗因头颈癌(HNC)而接受过宫颈放疗的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者往往需要对食管切除术进行仔细评估。本研究对此类患者的食管周围切除术和肿瘤预后进行了评估。研究人员对 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间确诊为 ESCC 并接受食管切除术与颈部吻合术的患者进行了回顾性研究。根据患者是否曾接受过 HNC 放疗(第 1 组)将其分为两组。经过1:2倾向评分匹配后,对围手术期和肿瘤学结果进行了评估,包括总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。共纳入 481 名患者,其中第一组 32 人,第二组 449 人。经过配对后,对第一组患者和第二组的 64 名患者进行了分析。第一组患者均为男性,平均年龄为 56 岁。中位放射剂量为 69 Gy。两组患者的吻合口漏、肺炎、呼吸衰竭和再次手术率相当。然而,声带麻痹在第一组中发生率更高,尤其是在进行喉返神经淋巴结清扫术的患者中(37.5%)。第一组和第二组的 3 年 OS(69.6% 对 75.2%;P = 0.26)和 RFS(50.8% 对 55.9%;P = 0.63)相似。总之,既往接受过 HNC 放疗和未接受过 HNC 放疗的 ESCC 患者的围手术期和肿瘤学结果相当,支持食管切除术是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
Eosinophilic esophagitis prevalence, incidence, and presenting features: a 22-year population-based observational study from southwest Sweden. Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis. Effect of benralizumab on histopathology and inflammatory signatures in a clinical cohort of eosinophilic esophagitis. Identification of gaps in the delivery of high-quality care of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Increased expression of proton pump and allergic inflammation genes predicts PPI failure in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1