Translating Priorities Into Practice: Midwifery Care for Uninsured Migrant Populations Across Canada.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1111/birt.12893
Heidi Elias, Lindsay Larios
{"title":"Translating Priorities Into Practice: Midwifery Care for Uninsured Migrant Populations Across Canada.","authors":"Heidi Elias, Lindsay Larios","doi":"10.1111/birt.12893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immigrants and newcomers are identified by many provincial midwifery associations as \"priority populations.\" Recently, newcomer populations have shifted considerably, with more people coming to Canada with precarious immigration status who are increasingly ineligible for public healthcare insurance and facing barriers to accessing care. Our aims were to: (1) gain an understanding of the policies related to equitable access to midwifery care and how they may apply to migrant groups without public healthcare insurance and (2) identify existing policy themes, gaps, and regulatory barriers that limit access for this vulnerable population in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a high-level document content analysis using a health equity framework. We aimed to identify language related to equitable access in midwifery services, with particular emphasis on uninsured populations. A total of 64 documents were analyzed, including legislation and publicly available statements from midwifery regulatory bodies and associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Midwifery regulatory authorities and associations across Canada are consistent in establishing an expectation that midwives will provide accessible care to diverse clientele. However, how these commitments are put into practice varies considerably between jurisdictions. We compared the cases of Manitoba and Ontario to illustrate the disconnect between commitments to priority populations and implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While there is a clearly demonstrated intention to provide equitable access to midwifery care to all people, including \"priority populations\" like migrants and newcomers, in practice, these commitments have not been fully realized. Equity is encumbered by broader structural issues, such as the growth in the number of newcomers without access to public health insurance. Moves toward equity within midwifery and healthcare more broadly need to meaningfully engage with other policy sectors, such as immigration, to be able to adapt to emerging issues affecting reproductive care, such as the growing precarity of newcomer populations in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immigrants and newcomers are identified by many provincial midwifery associations as "priority populations." Recently, newcomer populations have shifted considerably, with more people coming to Canada with precarious immigration status who are increasingly ineligible for public healthcare insurance and facing barriers to accessing care. Our aims were to: (1) gain an understanding of the policies related to equitable access to midwifery care and how they may apply to migrant groups without public healthcare insurance and (2) identify existing policy themes, gaps, and regulatory barriers that limit access for this vulnerable population in Canada.

Methods: We conducted a high-level document content analysis using a health equity framework. We aimed to identify language related to equitable access in midwifery services, with particular emphasis on uninsured populations. A total of 64 documents were analyzed, including legislation and publicly available statements from midwifery regulatory bodies and associations.

Results: Midwifery regulatory authorities and associations across Canada are consistent in establishing an expectation that midwives will provide accessible care to diverse clientele. However, how these commitments are put into practice varies considerably between jurisdictions. We compared the cases of Manitoba and Ontario to illustrate the disconnect between commitments to priority populations and implementation.

Discussion: While there is a clearly demonstrated intention to provide equitable access to midwifery care to all people, including "priority populations" like migrants and newcomers, in practice, these commitments have not been fully realized. Equity is encumbered by broader structural issues, such as the growth in the number of newcomers without access to public health insurance. Moves toward equity within midwifery and healthcare more broadly need to meaningfully engage with other policy sectors, such as immigration, to be able to adapt to emerging issues affecting reproductive care, such as the growing precarity of newcomer populations in Canada.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将优先事项转化为实践:加拿大各地无保险移民的助产护理。
背景:移民和新移民被许多省级助产士协会确定为 "优先人群"。最近,新移民人口发生了很大变化,越来越多的人以不稳定的移民身份来到加拿大,他们越来越没有资格享受公共医疗保险,并在获得护理方面面临障碍。我们的目标是(1)了解与公平获得助产护理相关的政策,以及这些政策如何适用于没有公共医疗保险的移民群体;(2)确定现有的政策主题、差距以及限制加拿大这一弱势群体获得护理的监管障碍:我们采用健康公平框架对文件内容进行了高级分析。我们的目标是识别与助产服务的公平获取相关的语言,尤其侧重于未参保人群。共分析了 64 份文件,包括助产士监管机构和协会的立法和公开声明:加拿大各地的助产士监管机构和协会都一致期望助产士能为不同的客户提供方便的护理服务。然而,如何将这些承诺付诸实践,各辖区之间存在很大差异。我们比较了马尼托巴省和安大略省的情况,以说明对重点人群的承诺与实施之间的脱节:虽然有明确的意图为所有人,包括移民和新移民等 "优先人群 "提供公平的助产护理机会,但在实践中,这些承诺并未完全实现。公平性受到更广泛的结构性问题的制约,例如无法获得公共医疗保险的新移民人数不断增加。在助产和更广泛的医疗保健领域实现公平需要与移民等其他政策部门进行有意义的合作,以便能够适应影响生殖保健的新问题,如加拿大新移民人口日益不稳定的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth. Pregnant Women's Care Needs During Early Labor-A Scoping Review. Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risk Factors Associated With Planned and Emergency Cesarean Births in Mexico. Validating the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework Index: A Global Tool for Quality-of-Care Evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1