Lauren Sobel , Madison Bernstein , Namita Arunkumar , Jennifer Fortin , Isabel Fulcher , Youri Hwang , Alisa B. Goldberg
{"title":"The impact of lifetime intimate partner violence on abortion method choice","authors":"Lauren Sobel , Madison Bernstein , Namita Arunkumar , Jennifer Fortin , Isabel Fulcher , Youri Hwang , Alisa B. Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><div>To evaluate if the type of abortion patients prefer differs for those with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) compared to those without a history of IPV.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We compared choice of medication versus procedural abortion between those with a history of lifetime IPV and those without a history of IPV among patients seeking abortion at 11 weeks’ gestation or less. Secondarily, we compared preferred abortion characteristics and assessed reproductive autonomy. Individuals presenting for abortion care were recruited for an anonymous, cross-sectional survey study at Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston Health Center from September 2021 to August 2022. We required 336 subjects to detect a 20% difference in abortion method between those with a lifetime history of IPV and those without, with 80% power.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 342 participants and excluded six with missing data. A total of 71 individuals (21%) reported a lifetime history of IPV. A majority of individuals with a lifetime history of IPV chose procedural abortion, although their abortion method choice did not differ significantly from individuals with no history of IPV (56.3% vs 47.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.244). Individuals with a lifetime IPV history used abortion funds more frequently than those without a history of lifetime IPV (8.5% vs 1.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.047). There was no statistical difference between individuals with and without a lifetime history of IPV regarding what individuals considered important for the type of abortion they chose or reproductive autonomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>Access to procedural abortion services and abortion funds are important to meet the abortion needs of patients with a lifetime history of IPV.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Providing both medication and procedural abortion and creating a trauma-informed environment are central to supporting individuals with a history of IPV. Safeguarding abortion fund access is important individuals with a history of IPV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 110732"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424004414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective(s)
To evaluate if the type of abortion patients prefer differs for those with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) compared to those without a history of IPV.
Study design
We compared choice of medication versus procedural abortion between those with a history of lifetime IPV and those without a history of IPV among patients seeking abortion at 11 weeks’ gestation or less. Secondarily, we compared preferred abortion characteristics and assessed reproductive autonomy. Individuals presenting for abortion care were recruited for an anonymous, cross-sectional survey study at Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston Health Center from September 2021 to August 2022. We required 336 subjects to detect a 20% difference in abortion method between those with a lifetime history of IPV and those without, with 80% power.
Results
We enrolled 342 participants and excluded six with missing data. A total of 71 individuals (21%) reported a lifetime history of IPV. A majority of individuals with a lifetime history of IPV chose procedural abortion, although their abortion method choice did not differ significantly from individuals with no history of IPV (56.3% vs 47.2%, p = 0.244). Individuals with a lifetime IPV history used abortion funds more frequently than those without a history of lifetime IPV (8.5% vs 1.5%, p = 0.047). There was no statistical difference between individuals with and without a lifetime history of IPV regarding what individuals considered important for the type of abortion they chose or reproductive autonomy.
Conclusion(s)
Access to procedural abortion services and abortion funds are important to meet the abortion needs of patients with a lifetime history of IPV.
Implications
Providing both medication and procedural abortion and creating a trauma-informed environment are central to supporting individuals with a history of IPV. Safeguarding abortion fund access is important individuals with a history of IPV.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.