Endotracheal intubation using a spiral endotracheal tube effectively reduces total tube handling time in children aged one month to six years using a McGrathTM video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized trial.
Rahendra Rahendra, Fajar Sesario, Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Raihanita Zahra, Christopher Kapuangan, Arif Hari Martono Marsaban, Aries Perdana
{"title":"Endotracheal intubation using a spiral endotracheal tube effectively reduces total tube handling time in children aged one month to six years using a McGrathTM video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Rahendra Rahendra, Fajar Sesario, Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Raihanita Zahra, Christopher Kapuangan, Arif Hari Martono Marsaban, Aries Perdana","doi":"10.17085/apm.24018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway management in children is challenging because of the smaller size, different proportions of anatomical structures compared to adults, and a higher risk of hypoxemia. Efforts to improve the efficiency of pediatric intubation can be made by manually twisting a spiral endotracheal tube (ETT) using a flexible stylet to manipulate its shape and angle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This controlled trial randomized fifty children aged one month to six years who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia into two groups (spiral ETT [sETT] and no-stylet ETT/standard ETT). The sETT was formed by twisting the ETT using a handmade tool. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of the sETT compared to the standard ETT in reducing intubation time. Secondary objectives were ETT placement accuracy, first-attempt intubation success rate, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total tube handling time in the sETT group was significantly shorter compared to the no-stylet ETT group (sETT 16.8 ± 3.6 vs. standard ETT 18.8 ± 3.7 seconds; P = 0.049). sETT placement had a significantly greater central placement accuracy (odds ratio, 4.846; 95% confidence interval, 1.287-18.255; P = 0.015). However, first-attempt successful intubation rate (sETT 80% vs. standard ETT 64%, P = 0.208) and total intubation time (sETT: 46.5 ± 5.2 vs. standard ETT 48.4 ± 4.9 seconds; P = 0.205) were not significantly different. No adverse effects were observed for either ETT type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spiral ETT effectively reduces total tube handling time and improves ETT placement accuracy in children using video laryngoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"19 Suppl 1","pages":"S113-S120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Airway management in children is challenging because of the smaller size, different proportions of anatomical structures compared to adults, and a higher risk of hypoxemia. Efforts to improve the efficiency of pediatric intubation can be made by manually twisting a spiral endotracheal tube (ETT) using a flexible stylet to manipulate its shape and angle.
Methods: This controlled trial randomized fifty children aged one month to six years who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia into two groups (spiral ETT [sETT] and no-stylet ETT/standard ETT). The sETT was formed by twisting the ETT using a handmade tool. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of the sETT compared to the standard ETT in reducing intubation time. Secondary objectives were ETT placement accuracy, first-attempt intubation success rate, and adverse effects.
Results: The mean total tube handling time in the sETT group was significantly shorter compared to the no-stylet ETT group (sETT 16.8 ± 3.6 vs. standard ETT 18.8 ± 3.7 seconds; P = 0.049). sETT placement had a significantly greater central placement accuracy (odds ratio, 4.846; 95% confidence interval, 1.287-18.255; P = 0.015). However, first-attempt successful intubation rate (sETT 80% vs. standard ETT 64%, P = 0.208) and total intubation time (sETT: 46.5 ± 5.2 vs. standard ETT 48.4 ± 4.9 seconds; P = 0.205) were not significantly different. No adverse effects were observed for either ETT type.
Conclusions: Spiral ETT effectively reduces total tube handling time and improves ETT placement accuracy in children using video laryngoscopy.
背景:由于儿童体型较小,解剖结构的比例与成人不同,而且低氧血症的风险较高,因此儿童气道管理具有挑战性。通过使用灵活的气管插针手动扭转螺旋形气管插管(ETT)以操纵其形状和角度,可以提高儿科插管的效率:这项对照试验将 50 名在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的 1 个月至 6 岁儿童随机分为两组(螺旋 ETT [sETT] 和无支架 ETT/标准 ETT)。sETT 是通过使用手工工具扭转 ETT 形成的。首要目标是确定与标准 ETT 相比,sETT 在缩短插管时间方面的有效性。次要目标是 ETT 置入准确性、首次尝试插管成功率和不良反应:sETT 组的平均插管总时间明显短于无支架 ETT 组(sETT 16.8 ± 3.6 秒 vs. 标准 ETT 18.8 ± 3.7 秒;P = 0.049)。sETT 置管的中心置管准确率明显更高(几率比 4.846;95% 置信区间 1.287-18.255;P = 0.015)。然而,首次尝试成功插管率(sETT 80% vs. 标准 ETT 64%,P = 0.208)和总插管时间(sETT:46.5 ± 5.2 vs. 标准 ETT 48.4 ± 4.9 秒;P = 0.205)没有明显差异。两种 ETT 均未发现不良反应:结论:在使用视频喉镜的儿童中,螺旋 ETT 可有效缩短管道处理总时间并提高 ETT 置放的准确性。