One Third of Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses are Missed by ICD Coding.

Laura Mercurio, Augusto Garcia, Stephanie Ruest, Susan J Duffy, Carsten Eickhoff
{"title":"One Third of Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses are Missed by ICD Coding.","authors":"Laura Mercurio, Augusto Garcia, Stephanie Ruest, Susan J Duffy, Carsten Eickhoff","doi":"10.1177/29767342241288112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/significance: </strong>Alcohol use carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet accurate identification of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a multi-layered problem for both researchers and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To fine-tune a language model to AUD in the clinical narrative and to detect AUDs not accounted for by ICD-9 coding in the MIMIC-III database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We applied clinicalBERT to unique patient discharge summaries. For classification, patients were divided into nonoverlapping groups stratified by the presence/absence of AUD ICD diagnosis for model training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%). For detection, the model was trained (80%) and validated (20%) on 1:1 positive/negative patients, then applied to remaining negative patient population. Physicians adjudicated 600 samples from the full model confidence spectrum to confirm AUD by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model exhibited the following characteristics (mean, standard deviation): precision (0.9, 0.02), recall (0.65, 0.03), F-1 (0.75, 0.02), area under the receiver operating curve (0.97, 0.01), and area under the precision-recall curve (0.86, 0.01). Adjudication produced an estimated 4% under-documentation rate for the total study population. As model confidence increased, AUD under-documentation rate rose to 30% of the number of patients identified as positive by ICD-9 coding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our model improves the identification of patients meeting AUD criteria, outperforming ICD codes in detecting cases of AUD. Detection discrepancy between ICD and free-text highlights clinician <i>under documentation</i>, not under recognition. Adjudication revealed model over-sensitivity to language around substance use, withdrawal, and chronic liver disease; future study requires application to a broader set of patient age and acuity. This model has the potential to improve rapid identification of patients with AUD and enhance treatment allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241288112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/significance: Alcohol use carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet accurate identification of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a multi-layered problem for both researchers and clinicians.

Objective: To fine-tune a language model to AUD in the clinical narrative and to detect AUDs not accounted for by ICD-9 coding in the MIMIC-III database.

Materials and methods: We applied clinicalBERT to unique patient discharge summaries. For classification, patients were divided into nonoverlapping groups stratified by the presence/absence of AUD ICD diagnosis for model training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%). For detection, the model was trained (80%) and validated (20%) on 1:1 positive/negative patients, then applied to remaining negative patient population. Physicians adjudicated 600 samples from the full model confidence spectrum to confirm AUD by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V criteria.

Results: The model exhibited the following characteristics (mean, standard deviation): precision (0.9, 0.02), recall (0.65, 0.03), F-1 (0.75, 0.02), area under the receiver operating curve (0.97, 0.01), and area under the precision-recall curve (0.86, 0.01). Adjudication produced an estimated 4% under-documentation rate for the total study population. As model confidence increased, AUD under-documentation rate rose to 30% of the number of patients identified as positive by ICD-9 coding.

Conclusion: Our model improves the identification of patients meeting AUD criteria, outperforming ICD codes in detecting cases of AUD. Detection discrepancy between ICD and free-text highlights clinician under documentation, not under recognition. Adjudication revealed model over-sensitivity to language around substance use, withdrawal, and chronic liver disease; future study requires application to a broader set of patient age and acuity. This model has the potential to improve rapid identification of patients with AUD and enhance treatment allocation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICD 编码遗漏了三分之一的酒精使用障碍诊断。
背景/意义:饮酒会导致严重的发病率和死亡率,但准确识别饮酒障碍(AUD)仍然是研究人员和临床医生面临的一个多层次问题:目的:对临床叙述中的 AUD 语言模型进行微调,并检测 MIMIC-III 数据库中 ICD-9 编码未包含的 AUD:我们将 clinicalBERT 应用于唯一的患者出院摘要。在分类时,根据是否存在 AUD ICD 诊断将患者分为非重叠组,分别进行模型训练(80%)、验证(10%)和测试(10%)。在检测方面,对 1:1 的阳性/阴性患者进行模型训练(80%)和验证(20%),然后应用于剩余的阴性患者群体。医生根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册-V》的标准,对整个模型置信区间的 600 个样本进行判定,以确认 AUD:该模型具有以下特征(平均值,标准偏差):精确度(0.9,0.02)、召回率(0.65,0.03)、F-1(0.75,0.02)、接收者工作曲线下面积(0.97,0.01)和精确度-召回率曲线下面积(0.86,0.01)。在所有研究人群中,通过判定得出的记录不足率估计为 4%。随着模型置信度的增加,AUD 记录不足率上升到 ICD-9 编码确定为阳性患者人数的 30%:结论:我们的模型能更好地识别符合 AUD 标准的患者,在发现 AUD 病例方面优于 ICD 编码。ICD 与自由文本之间的检测差异凸显了临床医生记录不足,而非识别不足。判定结果表明,该模型对药物使用、戒断和慢性肝病的语言过于敏感;未来的研究需要将其应用于更广泛的患者年龄和病情。该模型有望改善对 AUD 患者的快速识别,并加强治疗分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Hospital-Based Intervention to Improve Access to Buprenorphine for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. Practice Changes 6 Months Following a Physical Therapist Training Program Regarding Opioid Use and Misuse Screening and Assessment: A Qualitative Study. One Third of Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses are Missed by ICD Coding. Psychosocial Impact of Suspected Xylazine-Associated Skin Wounds Among People Using Fentanyl, Philadelphia, 2022 to 2023. Naloxone Distribution Models in the United States: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1