Long-Term Outcomes of Component Separation for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5091
Brian T. Fry, Leah J. Schoel, Ryan A. Howard, Jyothi R. Thumma, Abigail L. Kappelman, Alexander K. Hallway, Anne P. Ehlers, Sean M. O’Neill, Michael A. Rubyan, Jenny M. Shao, Dana A. Telem
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Component Separation for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair","authors":"Brian T. Fry, Leah J. Schoel, Ryan A. Howard, Jyothi R. Thumma, Abigail L. Kappelman, Alexander K. Hallway, Anne P. Ehlers, Sean M. O’Neill, Michael A. Rubyan, Jenny M. Shao, Dana A. Telem","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceComponent separation is a reconstructive technique used to facilitate midline closure of large or complex ventral hernias. Despite a contemporary surge in popularity, the incidence and long-term outcomes after component separation remain unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and long-term outcomes of component separation for abdominal wall hernia repair.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study examined 100% Medicare administrative claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2021. Participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) who underwent elective inpatient ventral hernia repair. Data were analyzed from January through June 2024.ExposureUse of component separation technique during ventral hernia repair.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the incidence of component separation over time and operative recurrence rates up to 10 years after surgery for hernia repairs with and without component separation. The secondary outcome was rate of operative recurrence after component separation stratified by surgeon volume.ResultsAmong 218 518 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 69.1 (10.9) years; 127 857 patients (58.5%) were female and 90 661 (41.5%) male. A total of 23 768 individuals had component separation for their abdominal wall hernia repair. The median (IQR) follow-up time after the index hernia surgery was 7.2 (2.7-10) years. Compared with patients who did not have a component separation, patients undergoing repair with component separation were slightly younger; more likely to be male; and more likely to have comorbidities, including obesity, and had surgeries that were more likely to be performed open and use mesh. Proportional use of component separation increased from 1.6% of all inpatient hernia repairs in 2007 (279 patients) to 21.4% in 2021 (1569 patients). The 10-year adjusted operative recurrence rate after component separation was lower (11.2%; 95% CI, 11.0%-11.3%) when compared with hernia repairs performed without component separation (12.9%; 95% CI, 12.8%-13.0%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .003). Operative recurrence was lower for the top 5% of surgeons by component separation volume (11.9%; 95% CI, 11.8%-12.1%) as opposed to the bottom 95% of surgeons by volume (13.6%; 95% CI, 13.4%-13.7%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that component separation was associated with a protective effect on long-term operative recurrence after ventral hernia repair among Medicare beneficiaries, which is somewhat unexpected given the intent of its use for higher complexity hernias. Surgeon volume, while significant, had only a minor influence on operative recurrence rates.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceComponent separation is a reconstructive technique used to facilitate midline closure of large or complex ventral hernias. Despite a contemporary surge in popularity, the incidence and long-term outcomes after component separation remain unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and long-term outcomes of component separation for abdominal wall hernia repair.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study examined 100% Medicare administrative claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2021. Participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) who underwent elective inpatient ventral hernia repair. Data were analyzed from January through June 2024.ExposureUse of component separation technique during ventral hernia repair.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the incidence of component separation over time and operative recurrence rates up to 10 years after surgery for hernia repairs with and without component separation. The secondary outcome was rate of operative recurrence after component separation stratified by surgeon volume.ResultsAmong 218 518 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 69.1 (10.9) years; 127 857 patients (58.5%) were female and 90 661 (41.5%) male. A total of 23 768 individuals had component separation for their abdominal wall hernia repair. The median (IQR) follow-up time after the index hernia surgery was 7.2 (2.7-10) years. Compared with patients who did not have a component separation, patients undergoing repair with component separation were slightly younger; more likely to be male; and more likely to have comorbidities, including obesity, and had surgeries that were more likely to be performed open and use mesh. Proportional use of component separation increased from 1.6% of all inpatient hernia repairs in 2007 (279 patients) to 21.4% in 2021 (1569 patients). The 10-year adjusted operative recurrence rate after component separation was lower (11.2%; 95% CI, 11.0%-11.3%) when compared with hernia repairs performed without component separation (12.9%; 95% CI, 12.8%-13.0%; P = .003). Operative recurrence was lower for the top 5% of surgeons by component separation volume (11.9%; 95% CI, 11.8%-12.1%) as opposed to the bottom 95% of surgeons by volume (13.6%; 95% CI, 13.4%-13.7%; P = .004).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that component separation was associated with a protective effect on long-term operative recurrence after ventral hernia repair among Medicare beneficiaries, which is somewhat unexpected given the intent of its use for higher complexity hernias. Surgeon volume, while significant, had only a minor influence on operative recurrence rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹壁疝修补术中组件分离的长期疗效
重要性组件分离是一种重建技术,用于促进大型或复杂腹壁疝的中线闭合。目标评估腹壁疝修补术中组件分离的发生率和长期疗效。设计、设置和参与者这项队列研究检查了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间 100%的医疗保险行政报销数据。参与者为接受择期住院腹壁疝修补术的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是使用和不使用组件分离技术的疝修补术术后10年内组件分离的发生率和手术复发率。结果218 518名接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,平均(标清)年龄为69.1(10.9)岁;127 857名患者(58.5%)为女性,90 661名患者(41.5%)为男性。共有 23 768 人在腹壁疝修补术中进行了组件分离。疝气手术后的随访时间中位数(IQR)为 7.2(2.7-10)年。与未进行组件分离手术的患者相比,接受组件分离修复手术的患者年龄略小,更有可能是男性,更有可能患有包括肥胖症在内的合并症,而且手术更有可能是开放性的,也更有可能使用网片。在所有住院患者的疝修补术中,组件分离术的使用比例从2007年的1.6%(279名患者)增加到2021年的21.4%(1569名患者)。与未进行组件分离的疝修补术相比,组件分离后的 10 年调整后手术复发率较低(11.2%;95% CI,11.0%-11.3%)(12.9%;95% CI,12.8%-13.0%;P = .003)。按组件分离量计算,排名前5%的外科医生的手术复发率较低(11.9%;95% CI,11.8%-12.1%),而按手术量计算,排名后95%的外科医生的手术复发率较低(13.6%;95% CI,13.4%-13.7%;P = .004)。这项研究发现,在医疗保险受益人中,组件分离对腹股沟疝修补术后的长期手术复发具有保护作用,这在一定程度上出乎人们的意料,因为组件分离的目的是用于复杂性较高的疝气。外科医生的数量虽然重要,但对手术复发率的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Vagus Nerve Preservation for Early Distal Gastric Cancer With Monitoring and Indocyanine Green Labeling Travel to High-Volume Centers and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer Benefits of Different Balanced Resuscitation Ratios for Thoracic vs Abdominopelvic Traumatic Hemorrhage Long-Term Outcomes of Component Separation for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1