Omicron-COVID-19-Related Knowledge in Parkinson's Disease Patients and Their Caregivers: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 2.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Annals of Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/09727531241284359
Neetu Rani Dhiman, Vyom Gyanpuri, Anand Kumar, Deepika Joshi
{"title":"Omicron-COVID-19-Related Knowledge in Parkinson's Disease Patients and Their Caregivers: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Neetu Rani Dhiman, Vyom Gyanpuri, Anand Kumar, Deepika Joshi","doi":"10.1177/09727531241284359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) became the global community's third major cause of worry. In the current study, we deployed a self-reported survey questionnaire to investigate the degree of comprehension, awareness and perception of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their respective caregivers (CGs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using a standardised questionnaire, we conducted a prospective study on PD patients attending the neurology outpatient department prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study period was between February and August of 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 CGs and 134 disease-affected patients were evaluated. Approximately 1.8% of the CGs and 4.5% of the patients contracted the Omicron-COVID-19. Over half of the patients (77.6%) were aware of the Omicron variant, and approximately 40.3% of them were aware of its symptoms. After receiving the Covid immunisation, patients (94.02%) reported no change in symptoms. The percentage of patients and CGs who had no symptoms of the viral infection and were not even got tested ever was 95.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Further, patients (95.5%) opted for the 'offline' as a preferred mode of consultation, citing the precision of treatment being the main reason.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No definite correlation between the Omicron variant infection and symptoms of PD could be established. The awareness regarding Omicron variant was largely unknown. More patient-centred research on larger population groups, incorporating literate and urban groups would unravel the knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"188-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531241284359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) became the global community's third major cause of worry. In the current study, we deployed a self-reported survey questionnaire to investigate the degree of comprehension, awareness and perception of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their respective caregivers (CGs).

Materials and methods: Using a standardised questionnaire, we conducted a prospective study on PD patients attending the neurology outpatient department prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study period was between February and August of 2022.

Results: A total of 114 CGs and 134 disease-affected patients were evaluated. Approximately 1.8% of the CGs and 4.5% of the patients contracted the Omicron-COVID-19. Over half of the patients (77.6%) were aware of the Omicron variant, and approximately 40.3% of them were aware of its symptoms. After receiving the Covid immunisation, patients (94.02%) reported no change in symptoms. The percentage of patients and CGs who had no symptoms of the viral infection and were not even got tested ever was 95.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Further, patients (95.5%) opted for the 'offline' as a preferred mode of consultation, citing the precision of treatment being the main reason.

Conclusion: No definite correlation between the Omicron variant infection and symptoms of PD could be established. The awareness regarding Omicron variant was largely unknown. More patient-centred research on larger population groups, incorporating literate and urban groups would unravel the knowledge gaps.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病患者及其护理人员的 Omicron-COVID-19 相关知识:横断面研究
简介SARS-CoV-2的Omicron变种(COVID-19)已成为全球社会的第三大担忧。在本研究中,我们采用自我报告调查问卷,调查帕金森病(PD)患者及其护理人员(CGs)对 COVID-19 奥米克龙变异体的理解、认识和感知程度:我们使用标准化问卷对在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间到神经科门诊就诊的帕金森病患者进行了前瞻性研究。研究时间为 2022 年 2 月至 8 月:结果:共评估了114个CG和134名受疾病影响的患者。约 1.8% 的 CG 和 4.5% 的患者感染了 Omicron-COVID-19。超过一半的患者(77.6%)知道 Omicron 变体,其中约 40.3% 知道其症状。接受 Covid 免疫接种后,患者(94.02%)表示症状没有变化。没有病毒感染症状,甚至从未接受过检测的患者和 CG 分别占 95.5%和 98.2%。此外,患者(95.5%)选择 "离线 "作为首选咨询方式,其主要原因是治疗的精确性:结论:奥米克隆变体感染与腹膜透析症状之间没有明确的相关性。人们对奥米克隆变异体的认识还很模糊。以患者为中心,在更大的人口群体(包括识字和城市群体)中开展更多的研究,将有助于填补知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Social Media Marketing and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Consumer Engagement with Reference to Emotional Attention, and Cognitive Appraisal. Association Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Developmental Crisis Among Young Adults: Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility. Gender Variations in Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Emerging Adults of Northern India. Effect of OM Chanting of 528Hz Frequency on Heart Rate Variability, Psychological Wellbeing, and Quality of Sleep in Patients of Hypertension: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Effect of Yoga-based Interventions on Heart Rate Variability and Anxiety Among Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1