The revolution of generative artificial intelligence in psychology: The interweaving of behavior, consciousness, and ethics

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104593
Dian Chen , Ying Liu , Yiting Guo , Yulin Zhang
{"title":"The revolution of generative artificial intelligence in psychology: The interweaving of behavior, consciousness, and ethics","authors":"Dian Chen ,&nbsp;Ying Liu ,&nbsp;Yiting Guo ,&nbsp;Yulin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there have been unparalleled prospects for psychological study due to the swift advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in natural language processing, shown by ChatGPT. This review article looks into the uses and effects of generative artificial intelligence in psychology. We employed a systematic selection process, encompassing papers published between 2015 and 2024 from databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore, using keywords like “Generative AI in psychology” “ChatGPT and behavior modeling” and “AI in mental health”. First, the paper goes over the fundamental ideas of generative AI and lists its uses in data analysis, behavior modeling, and social interaction simulation. A detailed comparison table has been added to contrast conventional research methodologies with GenAI-based approaches in psychology studies.</div><div>Next, analyzing the theoretical and ethical issues that generative AI raises for psychological research, it highlights how crucial it is to develop a coherent theoretical framework. This study illustrates the benefits of generative AI in handling vast amounts of data and increasing research efficiency by contrasting traditional research methods with AI-driven methodologies. Regarding particular uses, the study explores how generative AI might be used to simulate social interactions, analyze massive amounts of text, and learn about cognitive processes. Section 5 has been expanded to include discussions on political biases, geographic biases, and other biases.</div><div>In conclusion, the paper looks forward to the future development of generative AI in psychology research and suggests techniques for improving it. We have included methodological solutions such as the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach and human-in-the-loop systems, as well as data privacy solutions like open-source local LLMs. In summary, generative AI has the potential to revolutionize psychological research, but in order to maintain the moral and scientific integrity of the field, ethical and theoretical concerns must be carefully considered before applying the technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there have been unparalleled prospects for psychological study due to the swift advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in natural language processing, shown by ChatGPT. This review article looks into the uses and effects of generative artificial intelligence in psychology. We employed a systematic selection process, encompassing papers published between 2015 and 2024 from databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore, using keywords like “Generative AI in psychology” “ChatGPT and behavior modeling” and “AI in mental health”. First, the paper goes over the fundamental ideas of generative AI and lists its uses in data analysis, behavior modeling, and social interaction simulation. A detailed comparison table has been added to contrast conventional research methodologies with GenAI-based approaches in psychology studies.
Next, analyzing the theoretical and ethical issues that generative AI raises for psychological research, it highlights how crucial it is to develop a coherent theoretical framework. This study illustrates the benefits of generative AI in handling vast amounts of data and increasing research efficiency by contrasting traditional research methods with AI-driven methodologies. Regarding particular uses, the study explores how generative AI might be used to simulate social interactions, analyze massive amounts of text, and learn about cognitive processes. Section 5 has been expanded to include discussions on political biases, geographic biases, and other biases.
In conclusion, the paper looks forward to the future development of generative AI in psychology research and suggests techniques for improving it. We have included methodological solutions such as the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach and human-in-the-loop systems, as well as data privacy solutions like open-source local LLMs. In summary, generative AI has the potential to revolutionize psychological research, but in order to maintain the moral and scientific integrity of the field, ethical and theoretical concerns must be carefully considered before applying the technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能在心理学中的革命:行为、意识和伦理的交织。
近年来,由于生成式人工智能(AI)在自然语言处理方面的迅猛发展,心理学研究的前景无比广阔,这一点从 ChatGPT 中就可见一斑。这篇综述文章探讨了生成式人工智能在心理学中的应用和影响。我们采用了一个系统的筛选过程,从谷歌学术、PubMed 和 IEEE Xplore 等数据库中选取了 2015 年至 2024 年间发表的论文,并使用了 "心理学中的生成式人工智能"、"ChatGPT 与行为建模 "和 "人工智能在心理健康中的应用 "等关键词。首先,论文介绍了生成式人工智能的基本思想,并列举了其在数据分析、行为建模和社会互动模拟中的应用。此外,还添加了一份详细的对比表,将传统研究方法与基于 GenAI 的心理学研究方法进行对比。接下来,本研究分析了生成式人工智能为心理学研究带来的理论和伦理问题,强调了制定一个连贯的理论框架是多么重要。本研究通过对比传统研究方法和人工智能驱动的方法,说明了生成式人工智能在处理海量数据和提高研究效率方面的优势。在具体用途方面,本研究探讨了如何将生成式人工智能用于模拟社会互动、分析海量文本以及了解认知过程。第 5 节的内容有所扩展,纳入了对政治偏见、地理偏见和其他偏见的讨论。最后,本文展望了生成式人工智能在心理学研究中的未来发展,并提出了改进技术。我们提出了方法论解决方案,如检索增强生成(RAG)方法和人在环系统,以及数据隐私解决方案,如开源本地 LLM。总之,生成式人工智能有可能彻底改变心理学研究,但为了保持该领域的道德和科学完整性,在应用该技术之前,必须仔细考虑伦理和理论问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
A longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationship between teacher job satisfaction, workplace climate, and early childhood teachers' turnover intention Classroom anxiety, learning motivation, and English achievement of Chinese college students: The mediating role of self-efficacy Exploring the acceptance of mixed reality technology innovation among mining industry workers Prefrontal cortex activation and working memory performance in individuals with non-clinical depression: Insights from fNIRS Relationships between self-esteem-related dream content and explicit and implicit measures of self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1