Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the providers of oncological abdominal surgery services– a scoping review

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116068
Murielle Madi , Marcus Heise , Lisa Rieder , Elke Mattern , Ulrich Ronellenfitsch , Anke Steckelberg
{"title":"Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the providers of oncological abdominal surgery services– a scoping review","authors":"Murielle Madi ,&nbsp;Marcus Heise ,&nbsp;Lisa Rieder ,&nbsp;Elke Mattern ,&nbsp;Ulrich Ronellenfitsch ,&nbsp;Anke Steckelberg","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic, led to significant global health challenges. Medical services worldwide had to reconfigure to manage the surge in COVID-19 cases, including oncological abdominal surgery (OAS). This study investigates the impact of the pandemic on the OAS workforce and aims to enhance future healthcare preparedness to potential pandemics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review followed the methodologies from Arksey &amp; O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search included the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with backward citation tracking using Google Scholar™. The results were reported narratively and divided in categories and sub-categories. The reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies were included in this scoping review. Seven studies were conducted in the United Kingdom and eight in the European Union. Key findings include treatment plan alterations such as postponing or cancelling surgeries, referring patients to alternative treatments, and changes in surgical techniques. Organizational challenges included patient and healthcare professionals’ reallocation, resource shortages, and cold site availability. Measures to handle COVID-19 included adherence to guidelines, patient prioritization, and nursing roles. Testing and contamination prevention involved routine testing and the use of protective equipment. Communication shifted to virtual formats, with the introduction of telemedicine and video conferences. The pandemic induced significant psychological stress among surgical teams and highlighted lessons for future pandemics.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic required substantial adjustments in oncological surgery. Keeping up with rapidly changing recommendations was challenging, yet provided valuable lessons for future healthcare management and crisis response. Future pandemic preparedness strategies should include innovative solutions that unburden healthcare professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, led to significant global health challenges. Medical services worldwide had to reconfigure to manage the surge in COVID-19 cases, including oncological abdominal surgery (OAS). This study investigates the impact of the pandemic on the OAS workforce and aims to enhance future healthcare preparedness to potential pandemics.

Methods

This scoping review followed the methodologies from Arksey & O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search included the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with backward citation tracking using Google Scholar™. The results were reported narratively and divided in categories and sub-categories. The reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in this scoping review. Seven studies were conducted in the United Kingdom and eight in the European Union. Key findings include treatment plan alterations such as postponing or cancelling surgeries, referring patients to alternative treatments, and changes in surgical techniques. Organizational challenges included patient and healthcare professionals’ reallocation, resource shortages, and cold site availability. Measures to handle COVID-19 included adherence to guidelines, patient prioritization, and nursing roles. Testing and contamination prevention involved routine testing and the use of protective equipment. Communication shifted to virtual formats, with the introduction of telemedicine and video conferences. The pandemic induced significant psychological stress among surgical teams and highlighted lessons for future pandemics.

Discussion and conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic required substantial adjustments in oncological surgery. Keeping up with rapidly changing recommendations was challenging, yet provided valuable lessons for future healthcare management and crisis response. Future pandemic preparedness strategies should include innovative solutions that unburden healthcare professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行对腹部肿瘤外科服务提供者的影响--范围审查。
导言:COVID-19 大流行给全球健康带来了重大挑战。世界各地的医疗服务机构必须重新配置,以应对 COVID-19 病例的激增,其中包括肿瘤腹部手术(OAS)。本研究调查了这一流行病对腹部肿瘤外科劳动力的影响,旨在加强未来医疗服务对潜在流行病的准备:本范围综述采用 Arksey & O'Malley 和 Joanna Briggs 研究所的方法。检索范围包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 等数据库,并使用 Google Scholar™ 进行反向引文跟踪。检索结果以叙述方式报告,并按类别和子类别划分。报告遵循 PRISMA-ScR 指南:本次范围界定综述共纳入 15 项研究。七项研究在英国进行,八项在欧盟进行。主要发现包括治疗计划的改变,如推迟或取消手术、将患者转至其他治疗方法以及手术技术的改变。组织方面的挑战包括病人和医护人员的重新分配、资源短缺和冷场可用性。处理 COVID-19 的措施包括遵守指南、病人优先权和护理角色。检测和污染预防涉及常规检测和防护设备的使用。随着远程医疗和视频会议的引入,交流方式转向了虚拟形式。这次大流行给外科团队带来了巨大的心理压力,为今后的大流行提供了借鉴:COVID-19 大流行要求肿瘤外科做出重大调整。跟上快速变化的建议具有挑战性,但也为未来的医疗管理和危机应对提供了宝贵的经验。未来的大流行准备战略应包括创新解决方案,减轻医疗保健专业人员的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The multidisciplinary Landscape of gender affirmation surgical training. Are there any benefits to hospital consolidation? Global health experience among general surgery residents': Experiences, attitudes, and barriers. An organized approach to attract a diverse pool of applicants within a surgery residency program. Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1