Sublobar or lobar resection in early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer less than 2cm: A meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116069
Lei Wang, Jianming Zhou, Shengjie Jing, Bin Liu, Jin Fang, Tao Xue
{"title":"Sublobar or lobar resection in early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer less than 2cm: A meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials","authors":"Lei Wang,&nbsp;Jianming Zhou,&nbsp;Shengjie Jing,&nbsp;Bin Liu,&nbsp;Jin Fang,&nbsp;Tao Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of our study was to investigate whether sublobar resection is non-inferior to lobar resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer less than 2 ​cm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to June 3, 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and the secondary outcomes were 5-year disease-free survival, cancer-related mortality, recurrence rate, postoperative lung function and perioperative events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5 studies enrolling 2035 patients were included. Sublobar resection was found to be non-inferior to lobar resection concerning the 5-year survival rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate and cancer-related mortality. However, sublobar resection was associated with higher recurrence rate and less reduction of postoperative lung function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sublobar resection was non-inferior to lobar resection in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with better postoperative lung function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of our study was to investigate whether sublobar resection is non-inferior to lobar resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer less than 2 ​cm.

Methods

This is a meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to June 3, 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and the secondary outcomes were 5-year disease-free survival, cancer-related mortality, recurrence rate, postoperative lung function and perioperative events.

Results

A total of 5 studies enrolling 2035 patients were included. Sublobar resection was found to be non-inferior to lobar resection concerning the 5-year survival rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate and cancer-related mortality. However, sublobar resection was associated with higher recurrence rate and less reduction of postoperative lung function.

Conclusions

Sublobar resection was non-inferior to lobar resection in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with better postoperative lung function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小于 2 厘米的早期周围非小细胞肺癌的叶下或叶状切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
研究目的我们的研究旨在探讨在小于 2 厘米的早期非小细胞肺癌中,叶下切除术是否不优于叶状切除术:这是一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central Register,截止日期为 2023 年 6 月 3 日。主要结果为5年生存率,次要结果为5年无病生存率、癌症相关死亡率、复发率、术后肺功能和围手术期事件:共有 5 项研究纳入了 2035 名患者。结果:共纳入了 5 项研究,2035 名患者。研究发现,在 5 年生存率、5 年无病生存率和癌症相关死亡率方面,叶下切除术并不优于叶上切除术。然而,叶下切除术的复发率较高,术后肺功能下降较少:结论:就生存率而言,叶下切除术并不比肺叶切除术差,而且术后肺功能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The multidisciplinary Landscape of gender affirmation surgical training. Are there any benefits to hospital consolidation? Global health experience among general surgery residents': Experiences, attitudes, and barriers. An organized approach to attract a diverse pool of applicants within a surgery residency program. Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1