Shirley J Shao, Andrew Grimes, Marley Rashad, Liina Poder, Dorothy Shum, Nasim Camillia Sobhani
{"title":"Incidence of new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Shirley J Shao, Andrew Grimes, Marley Rashad, Liina Poder, Dorothy Shum, Nasim Camillia Sobhani","doi":"10.1055/a-2466-1319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for evaluation of fetal anomalies, and rates of incidental maternal findings are not well characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of incidental maternal findings at the time of antenatal MRI performed for fetal indications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that included all fetal MRIs performed between 2018-2023 at a single tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and treatment center. The electronic medical record was reviewed to identify all documented maternal findings and any new, non-physiologic maternal findings. The latter was defined as previously unknown abnormalities of maternal structures unrelated to normal physiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 834 imaging events, performed at an average gestational age of 23 weeks. The most common indication for imaging was fetal anomaly (81.1%). The most common imaging type was fetal brain MRI (81.4%). Overall, 16.2% reported a maternal finding and 7% reported a new, non-physiologic finding. The most common new, non-physiologic findings were renal cysts (n=11), liver cysts (n=6), and gallstones or gallbladder sludge (n=5). Compared to imaging events that included a fetal brain MRI, imaging events that included a fetal body MRI had a significantly higher rate of any maternal findings (53.0% vs 10.4%, p< 0.001) and new, non-physiologic maternal findings (26.9% vs 3.7%, p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the risk of identifying new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal MRI is low. The rate of any maternal and new, non-physiologic maternal findings may differ by fetal MRI type due to differences in imaging depth and extent of radiology subspecialist review. These data should be incorporated into pre-test counseling for patients planning to have fetal MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-1319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for evaluation of fetal anomalies, and rates of incidental maternal findings are not well characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of incidental maternal findings at the time of antenatal MRI performed for fetal indications.
Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all fetal MRIs performed between 2018-2023 at a single tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and treatment center. The electronic medical record was reviewed to identify all documented maternal findings and any new, non-physiologic maternal findings. The latter was defined as previously unknown abnormalities of maternal structures unrelated to normal physiology.
Results: Our study included 834 imaging events, performed at an average gestational age of 23 weeks. The most common indication for imaging was fetal anomaly (81.1%). The most common imaging type was fetal brain MRI (81.4%). Overall, 16.2% reported a maternal finding and 7% reported a new, non-physiologic finding. The most common new, non-physiologic findings were renal cysts (n=11), liver cysts (n=6), and gallstones or gallbladder sludge (n=5). Compared to imaging events that included a fetal brain MRI, imaging events that included a fetal body MRI had a significantly higher rate of any maternal findings (53.0% vs 10.4%, p< 0.001) and new, non-physiologic maternal findings (26.9% vs 3.7%, p< 0.001).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the risk of identifying new, non-physiologic maternal findings on fetal MRI is low. The rate of any maternal and new, non-physiologic maternal findings may differ by fetal MRI type due to differences in imaging depth and extent of radiology subspecialist review. These data should be incorporated into pre-test counseling for patients planning to have fetal MRI.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.