Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017
Ming Yang, Jie Xu, Jing Xue, Yuesong Pan, Aichun Cheng, Feng Gao, Xia Meng, Zhongrong Miao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.","authors":"Ming Yang, Jie Xu, Jing Xue, Yuesong Pan, Aichun Cheng, Feng Gao, Xia Meng, Zhongrong Miao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and CYP2C19 genotypes are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels using the CHANCE trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with both of CYP2C19 major alleles information (*2, *3, and *17) and hsCRP measurements were enrolled from the prespecified subgroup. CYP2C19 LoFA carriers were defined as patients with either*2 or *3 allele. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2801 patients, 1646 (58.8%) were LoFA carriers, and 922 (32.9%) had elevated hsCRP. In patients with non-elevated hsCRP, there was a significant interaction effect between CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status and dual/single antiplatelet regimens for prevention of recurrent stroke and combined vascular events (p =0.048, 0.048, respectively), but, not in patients with elevated hsCRP (p =0.502, 0.472, respectively). Only among patients with non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA, dual antiplatelets significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio= 0.44 [0.26-0.74], p=0.003). No significant differences in bleeding were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA may predict a better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence and composite vascular events for patients with minor stroke and high-risk TIA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979589.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and CYP2C19 genotypes are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LoFA) carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels using the CHANCE trial.

Methods: Subjects with both of CYP2C19 major alleles information (*2, *3, and *17) and hsCRP measurements were enrolled from the prespecified subgroup. CYP2C19 LoFA carriers were defined as patients with either*2 or *3 allele. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status with the effects of dual/single antiplatelet therapy at different hsCRP levels. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke within 90 days.

Results: Among 2801 patients, 1646 (58.8%) were LoFA carriers, and 922 (32.9%) had elevated hsCRP. In patients with non-elevated hsCRP, there was a significant interaction effect between CYP2C19 LoFA carrying status and dual/single antiplatelet regimens for prevention of recurrent stroke and combined vascular events (p =0.048, 0.048, respectively), but, not in patients with elevated hsCRP (p =0.502, 0.472, respectively). Only among patients with non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA, dual antiplatelets significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio= 0.44 [0.26-0.74], p=0.003). No significant differences in bleeding were found.

Conclusions: Non-elevated hsCRP and non-carrier of CYP2C19 LoFA may predict a better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing stroke recurrence and composite vascular events for patients with minor stroke and high-risk TIA.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979589.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 hsCRP 水平和 CYP2C19 基因型确定缺血性脑卒中后双重抗血小板疗法的疗效
背景:高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)和CYP2C19基因型都是缺血性卒中临床结局的独立预测因子。我们旨在通过CHANCE试验评估CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因(LoFA)携带状态与不同hsCRP水平下双/单抗血小板治疗效果的相关性:从预设亚组中选取同时具有 CYP2C19 主要等位基因信息(*2、*3 和 *17)和 hsCRP 测量值的受试者。CYP2C19 LoFA携带者被定义为具有*2或*3等位基因的患者。Cox比例危险模型用于评估CYP2C19 LoFA携带状态与不同hsCRP水平下双/单抗血小板治疗效果的交互作用。主要结果是90天内复发中风:在2801例患者中,1646例(58.8%)为LoFA携带者,922例(32.9%)hsCRP升高。在 hsCRP 未升高的患者中,CYP2C19 LoFA 携带者身份与双联/单联抗血小板方案在预防复发性中风和合并血管事件方面存在显著的交互效应(分别为 p =0.048、0.048),但在 hsCRP 升高的患者中不存在交互效应(分别为 p =0.502、0.472)。只有在 hsCRP 未升高且非 CYP2C19 LoFA 携带者的患者中,与单用阿司匹林相比,双联抗血小板药物可显著降低复发性卒中的风险(危险比= 0.44 [0.26-0.74],P=0.003)。在出血方面没有发现明显差异:结论:不升高的 hsCRP 和非 CYP2C19 LoFA 携带者可预测双联抗血小板疗法在减少轻微卒中和高风险 TIA 患者卒中复发和复合血管事件方面的更好反应:NCT00979589。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis of patients with non-specific electrocardiogram findings in a Tanzanian Emergency Department. Effect of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo on days alive and out of hospital: An analysis from AUGUSTUS. Chest pain and coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis: Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Changes in coverage, access, and health status among adults with cardiovascular disease after medicaid work requirements. Impact of Moderate or Severe Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1