Distinct Constructs Underlie Patient-Reported and Performance-Rated Outcomes after Stroke.

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1002/ana.27129
Julie A DiCarlo, Abhishek Jaywant, Perman Gochyyev, Anna K Bonkhoff, Richard Hardstone, Kimberly S Erler, Jessica Ranford, Alison Cloutier, Nathan Ward, Kelly L Sloane, Lee H Schwamm, Steven C Cramer, David J Lin
{"title":"Distinct Constructs Underlie Patient-Reported and Performance-Rated Outcomes after Stroke.","authors":"Julie A DiCarlo, Abhishek Jaywant, Perman Gochyyev, Anna K Bonkhoff, Richard Hardstone, Kimberly S Erler, Jessica Ranford, Alison Cloutier, Nathan Ward, Kelly L Sloane, Lee H Schwamm, Steven C Cramer, David J Lin","doi":"10.1002/ana.27129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which capture patients' perspectives on the consequences of health and disease, are widely used in neurological care and research. However, it is unclear how PROMs relate to performance-rated impairments. Sociodemographic factors are known to affect PROMs. Direct damage to brain regions critical for self-awareness (i.e., parietal regions and the salience/ventral-attention network) may also impair self-report outcomes. This study examined the relationship between PROMs and performance-based measures in stroke survivors with arm motor impairments. We hypothesized that PROMs would be distinct from performance-based outcomes, influenced by sociodemographic factors, and linked to damage in brain circuits involved in self-perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We longitudinally assessed 54 stroke survivors using patient-reported and performance-rated measures at 4 timepoints. We used factor analysis to reveal the outcome battery's factorial structure. Linear regression examined the association between classes of measures and sociodemographics. Voxel-lesion-symptom-mapping, region-of-interest-based analysis, and voxel-lesion-network-mapping investigated the relationship between classes of outcomes and stroke-related injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance-based and patient-reported measures formed distinct factors, consistent across recovery phases. Higher education (β1 = 0.36, p = 0.02) and income adequacy (β2 = 0.48, p = 0.05) were associated with patient-reported, but not performance-rated outcomes. Greater parietal lobe injury, irrespective of hemisphere, was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes; greater corticospinal tract injury related to worse performance-rated outcomes. Lesions with greater functional connectivity to the salience/ventral-attention network were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes (r = -0.35, p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings reveal important differences between performance-rated and patient-reported outcomes, each with specific associated factors and anatomy post-stroke. Incorporating sociodemographic and neuroanatomic characteristics into neurorehabilitation strategies may inform and optimize patient outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which capture patients' perspectives on the consequences of health and disease, are widely used in neurological care and research. However, it is unclear how PROMs relate to performance-rated impairments. Sociodemographic factors are known to affect PROMs. Direct damage to brain regions critical for self-awareness (i.e., parietal regions and the salience/ventral-attention network) may also impair self-report outcomes. This study examined the relationship between PROMs and performance-based measures in stroke survivors with arm motor impairments. We hypothesized that PROMs would be distinct from performance-based outcomes, influenced by sociodemographic factors, and linked to damage in brain circuits involved in self-perception.

Methods: We longitudinally assessed 54 stroke survivors using patient-reported and performance-rated measures at 4 timepoints. We used factor analysis to reveal the outcome battery's factorial structure. Linear regression examined the association between classes of measures and sociodemographics. Voxel-lesion-symptom-mapping, region-of-interest-based analysis, and voxel-lesion-network-mapping investigated the relationship between classes of outcomes and stroke-related injury.

Results: Performance-based and patient-reported measures formed distinct factors, consistent across recovery phases. Higher education (β1 = 0.36, p = 0.02) and income adequacy (β2 = 0.48, p = 0.05) were associated with patient-reported, but not performance-rated outcomes. Greater parietal lobe injury, irrespective of hemisphere, was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes; greater corticospinal tract injury related to worse performance-rated outcomes. Lesions with greater functional connectivity to the salience/ventral-attention network were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes (r = -0.35, p = 0.009).

Interpretation: Our findings reveal important differences between performance-rated and patient-reported outcomes, each with specific associated factors and anatomy post-stroke. Incorporating sociodemographic and neuroanatomic characteristics into neurorehabilitation strategies may inform and optimize patient outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后患者自述结果和表现评定结果的不同结构特征
目的:患者报告结果测量法(PROMs)能反映患者对健康和疾病后果的看法,在神经病学护理和研究中得到广泛应用。然而,目前还不清楚 PROMs 与表现评定损伤之间的关系。已知社会人口因素会影响 PROMs。对自我意识至关重要的脑区(即顶叶区和显著性/内侧注意网络)的直接损伤也可能会损害自我报告结果。本研究考察了有手臂运动障碍的中风幸存者的 PROMs 与基于表现的测量之间的关系。我们假设 PROMs 与基于表现的结果不同,受社会人口因素的影响,并与涉及自我感知的大脑回路的损伤有关:方法: 我们在 4 个时间点使用患者报告和表现评分方法对 54 名中风幸存者进行了纵向评估。我们使用因子分析揭示了结果电池的因子结构。线性回归检验了测量类别与社会人口统计学之间的关联。体素-病灶-症状图谱、基于兴趣区域的分析和体素-病灶-网络图谱研究了结果类别与中风相关损伤之间的关系:结果:基于表现的测量和患者报告的测量形成了不同的因素,这些因素在不同的恢复阶段是一致的。教育程度较高(β1 = 0.36,p = 0.02)和收入充足(β2 = 0.48,p = 0.05)与患者报告的结果相关,但与表现评分结果无关。顶叶损伤程度越严重,无论其在哪个半球,患者报告的结果越差;皮质脊髓束损伤程度越严重,表现评分结果越差。与显著性/内省注意网络功能连接性更强的病变与患者报告的结果更差有关(r = -0.35,p = 0.009):我们的研究结果揭示了脑卒中后表现评定结果与患者报告结果之间的重要差异,每种结果都与特定的相关因素和解剖结构有关。将社会人口学和神经解剖学特征纳入神经康复策略可为患者提供信息并优化其康复效果。ann neurol 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Oropouche Virus: An Emerging Neuroinvasive Arbovirus. Cerebrovascular Function in Sporadic and Genetic Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Micro-Doses of DNP Preserve Motor and Muscle Function with a Period of Functional Recovery in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice. Elevated Cerebrospinal Fluid Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase Isozyme L1 in Asymptomatic C9orf72 Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion Carriers. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1