Willingness-to-taste in UK children aged 4-7 years was driven by contextual facilitation, not intervention, in a randomized controlled trial of sensory food education.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107756
Nicholas M Wilkinson, Marion M Hetherington, Srimathi Kannan, Harish Ganguri, Charlotte E L Evans
{"title":"Willingness-to-taste in UK children aged 4-7 years was driven by contextual facilitation, not intervention, in a randomized controlled trial of sensory food education.","authors":"Nicholas M Wilkinson, Marion M Hetherington, Srimathi Kannan, Harish Ganguri, Charlotte E L Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many children would benefit from a diet richer in vegetables and fruit. Reluctance to taste new foods is widely recognised as a barrier to healthy dietary variety in children. 'Flavour School' is a programme of 'sensory food education', aiming to increase children's confidence and curiosity in exploring foods and flavours, especially vegetables and fruit. We report a pre-registered, cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the outcomes of the Flavour School programme, in n=160 children aged 4-7 years from 5 UK schools in London and Leeds. Children either received the Flavour School programme (experimental group n=84) or no intervention (control group n=76), in a two-level design with children clustered within school classes. Data collection consisted of video recorded behavioural observation during a tasting activity designed to resemble a Flavour School activity, conducted before and after the intervention. Linear regression models were used to fit relationships between independent variables and outcomes; Willingness-to-taste, Enjoyment (positive/negative facial expression), and Expressiveness (change in facial expression). Most children engaged readily in the tasting activity at baseline. At follow-up children engaged with the tasting activity even more readily (on average biting one more food sample), with no significant effect of the intervention. We interpret these findings to indicate that intra-individual tasting behavior in children is context-dependent. Our results suggest that the context of sensory food education activities facilitates openness to tasting across the normal range of individual traits. However, we find no evidence that receiving sensory food education makes a reluctant taster into a less reluctant taster; no 'curative' effect of the intervention was observed. Rather, even usually fussy/reluctant children were often willing to have a go at tasting in the conducive context of an exploratory activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 40249947 Date assigned 17/03/2020 Last edited 24/10/2022 Version 1.2 Trial Acronym OASES (Outcomes Assessment of Sensory Education in Schools).</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107756"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many children would benefit from a diet richer in vegetables and fruit. Reluctance to taste new foods is widely recognised as a barrier to healthy dietary variety in children. 'Flavour School' is a programme of 'sensory food education', aiming to increase children's confidence and curiosity in exploring foods and flavours, especially vegetables and fruit. We report a pre-registered, cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the outcomes of the Flavour School programme, in n=160 children aged 4-7 years from 5 UK schools in London and Leeds. Children either received the Flavour School programme (experimental group n=84) or no intervention (control group n=76), in a two-level design with children clustered within school classes. Data collection consisted of video recorded behavioural observation during a tasting activity designed to resemble a Flavour School activity, conducted before and after the intervention. Linear regression models were used to fit relationships between independent variables and outcomes; Willingness-to-taste, Enjoyment (positive/negative facial expression), and Expressiveness (change in facial expression). Most children engaged readily in the tasting activity at baseline. At follow-up children engaged with the tasting activity even more readily (on average biting one more food sample), with no significant effect of the intervention. We interpret these findings to indicate that intra-individual tasting behavior in children is context-dependent. Our results suggest that the context of sensory food education activities facilitates openness to tasting across the normal range of individual traits. However, we find no evidence that receiving sensory food education makes a reluctant taster into a less reluctant taster; no 'curative' effect of the intervention was observed. Rather, even usually fussy/reluctant children were often willing to have a go at tasting in the conducive context of an exploratory activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 40249947 Date assigned 17/03/2020 Last edited 24/10/2022 Version 1.2 Trial Acronym OASES (Outcomes Assessment of Sensory Education in Schools).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项感官食品教育随机对照试验中,英国 4-7 岁儿童的味觉意愿是由情境促进而非干预所驱动的。
许多儿童都会从多吃蔬菜和水果的饮食中受益。人们普遍认为,不愿品尝新食物是妨碍儿童健康饮食多样化的一个障碍。风味学校 "是一项 "感官食物教育 "计划,旨在增强儿童探索食物和风味(尤其是蔬菜和水果)的信心和好奇心。我们报告了一项预先登记的分组随机对照试验,以评估 "风味学校 "计划的成果,试验对象是来自英国伦敦和利兹 5 所学校的 160 名 4-7 岁儿童。孩子们要么接受 "风味校园 "计划(实验组,人数=84),要么不接受干预(对照组,人数=76),采用两级设计,将孩子们集中在学校班级中。数据收集包括在干预前后进行的类似 "风味学校 "活动的品尝活动中的行为观察录像。线性回归模型用于拟合自变量与结果(品尝意愿、享受(正面/负面面部表情)和表现力(面部表情变化))之间的关系。大多数儿童在基线时都很愿意参与品尝活动。在后续调查中,儿童更愿意参与品尝活动(平均多咬一个食物样本),但干预效果并不显著。我们对这些结果的解释是,儿童的个体内部品尝行为取决于情境。我们的研究结果表明,感官食物教育活动的情境有利于在正常的个体特征范围内开放品尝。然而,我们没有发现任何证据表明,接受感官食物教育后,不愿意品尝食物的儿童会变得不那么不愿意品尝食物;也没有观察到干预的 "治疗 "效果。相反,在探索活动的有利环境下,即使是通常挑剔/不情愿的儿童也往往愿意尝试品尝。试验注册:ISRCTN:40249947 指定日期:2020 年 3 月 17 日 最后编辑日期:2022 年 10 月 24 日 1.2 版 试验缩写:OASES(学校感官教育结果评估)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption. "Flavor, fun, and vitamins"? Consumers' Lay Beliefs About Child-Oriented Food Products. Association of Maternal Immigration Status with Emotional Eating in Taiwanese Children: The Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Feeding Practices. Weight Discrimination as a Predictor of Stress and Eating: The Role of Identifying as "Fat". Food rejection is associated with tactile sensitivity and tactile appreciation in three-year-old children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1