Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291
Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.","authors":"Jin Ah Kwon, Min Jeng Cho","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.5.291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units.

Methods: A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed.

Results: The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group.

Conclusion: CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients. Mortality and associated factors among patients who underwent liver transplantation in South Korea from 2017 to 2021: a retrospective observational study. Outcomes in emergency surgery following the implementation of an acute care surgery model: a retrospective observational study. Primary tumor sidedness is not prognostic factor in resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a retrospective observational cohort study. The efficacy of exosomes from human chemically derived hepatic progenitors in liver damage alleviation: a preclinical experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1