Mortality association with extremity trauma and transferring patients for higher level of care.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002609
Aldin Malkoc, Xinfei Miao, Kathryn Pillai, Neda Salami, Catherine Lai, Raja GnanaDev, Keith Glover, Brandon Woodward, Samuel Schwartz
{"title":"Mortality association with extremity trauma and transferring patients for higher level of care.","authors":"Aldin Malkoc, Xinfei Miao, Kathryn Pillai, Neda Salami, Catherine Lai, Raja GnanaDev, Keith Glover, Brandon Woodward, Samuel Schwartz","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rising healthcare costs and reduced Medicaid reimbursements pose lasting challenges for trauma centers. Various studies have highlighted the adverse effect of these cost-related circumstances on trauma center survival and the need for local hospitals to transfer patients to tertiary and quaternary care centers. Our study seeks to assess the relationship between patient transfer status to a higher-level health center and its association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 19 417 patients were identified, of which 15 317 patients presented directly to the higher level health center, and 3830 patients who transferred from 49 different outside hospitals within a 500-mile radius. Data collection was collected from the receiving higher level of care hospital trauma registry. IBM SPSS version 23 was used to analyze the data. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis based on age, sex, and injury severity score yielded 3566 patients that presented directly to ARMC and 3566 patients who were transferred to ARMC for a higher level of care. Amongst various factors we considered mechanism of injury, response levels, arrival methods, and transfusion of blood products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The univariate analysis of the propensity-matched analysis demonstrated 88% blunt injury in the nontransferred group and 82% in the transferred group (<i>P</i><0.001). Overall, hospital mortality was 3% in nontransferred patients versus 4% in the transferred group (<i>P</i><0.001). A multivariate logistic regression demonstrated mortality is more likely in patients with higher injury severity scores [odd ratio (OD) 2.351 (1.029-1.082), <i>P</i><0.001] and lack of packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions received within first 4 h [OD 6.852 (3.525-13.318), <i>P</i>=0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transfer of trauma patients with extremity injuries to level 1 trauma centers has significant implications on patient outcomes. In our retrospective observational cohort study, the authors noted increased mortality among patients with higher injury severity scores, penetrating injuries, pRBC administration within the first 4 h of hospitalization, and among patient transfers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"86 11","pages":"6433-6439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rising healthcare costs and reduced Medicaid reimbursements pose lasting challenges for trauma centers. Various studies have highlighted the adverse effect of these cost-related circumstances on trauma center survival and the need for local hospitals to transfer patients to tertiary and quaternary care centers. Our study seeks to assess the relationship between patient transfer status to a higher-level health center and its association with mortality.

Methods: A total of 19 417 patients were identified, of which 15 317 patients presented directly to the higher level health center, and 3830 patients who transferred from 49 different outside hospitals within a 500-mile radius. Data collection was collected from the receiving higher level of care hospital trauma registry. IBM SPSS version 23 was used to analyze the data. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis based on age, sex, and injury severity score yielded 3566 patients that presented directly to ARMC and 3566 patients who were transferred to ARMC for a higher level of care. Amongst various factors we considered mechanism of injury, response levels, arrival methods, and transfusion of blood products.

Results: The univariate analysis of the propensity-matched analysis demonstrated 88% blunt injury in the nontransferred group and 82% in the transferred group (P<0.001). Overall, hospital mortality was 3% in nontransferred patients versus 4% in the transferred group (P<0.001). A multivariate logistic regression demonstrated mortality is more likely in patients with higher injury severity scores [odd ratio (OD) 2.351 (1.029-1.082), P<0.001] and lack of packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions received within first 4 h [OD 6.852 (3.525-13.318), P=0.001].

Conclusion: The transfer of trauma patients with extremity injuries to level 1 trauma centers has significant implications on patient outcomes. In our retrospective observational cohort study, the authors noted increased mortality among patients with higher injury severity scores, penetrating injuries, pRBC administration within the first 4 h of hospitalization, and among patient transfers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡率与四肢创伤和转送病人接受更高一级护理有关。
导言:不断上涨的医疗成本和医疗补助报销额度的减少给创伤中心带来了持久的挑战。各种研究都强调了这些与成本相关的情况对创伤中心存活率的不利影响,以及当地医院将患者转至三级和四级医疗中心的必要性。我们的研究旨在评估患者转往上级医疗中心的情况与死亡率之间的关系:研究共确定了 19 417 名患者,其中 15 317 名患者是直接到上级医疗中心就诊的,3830 名患者是从方圆 500 英里内的 49 家不同的外部医院转来的。数据收集来自接受治疗的上级医院创伤登记处。数据分析采用 IBM SPSS 23 版本。根据年龄、性别和受伤严重程度评分进行1:1倾向性匹配分析,结果显示有3566名患者直接到 ARMC就诊,3566名患者转到 ARMC接受更高级别的治疗。在各种因素中,我们考虑了受伤机制、反应水平、到达方式和输血产品:倾向匹配分析的单变量分析显示,未转院组中钝器伤占88%,转院组中钝器伤占82%(PPPP=0.001]:将四肢受伤的创伤患者转至一级创伤中心对患者的预后有重要影响。在我们的回顾性观察队列研究中,作者注意到损伤严重程度评分较高、穿透性损伤、住院后 4 小时内使用 pRBC 的患者以及转院患者的死亡率均有所上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Hereditary multiple exostoses with cervical spine involvement: a case report: Retraction. Acalvaria, rare congenital malformation in Palestine: case report and literature review: Retraction. Influence of clinical experience in detecting calcifications of the head and neck region on panoramic radiographs: an app-based evaluation. Apple Vision Pro as an augmentative tool in surgery: a double-edged scalpel. Management of recurrent end-stage achalasia with robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1