Evaluation and prediction of relapse risk in stable systemic lupus erythematosus patients after glucocorticoid withdrawal (PRESS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled study in China.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1136/ard-2024-225826
Yunyun Fei, Lidan Zhao, Lijun Wu, Xiaoxia Zuo, Rongli Li, Jiaomei Cheng, Hui Luo, Xue Wu, Li Sun, Jingjing Xu, Yingxuan Zhu, Yang Wang, Zhu Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiaofei Wang, Xuan Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation and prediction of relapse risk in stable systemic lupus erythematosus patients after glucocorticoid withdrawal (PRESS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled study in China.","authors":"Yunyun Fei, Lidan Zhao, Lijun Wu, Xiaoxia Zuo, Rongli Li, Jiaomei Cheng, Hui Luo, Xue Wu, Li Sun, Jingjing Xu, Yingxuan Zhu, Yang Wang, Zhu Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiaofei Wang, Xuan Zhang","doi":"10.1136/ard-2024-225826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the relapse rate after glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal with or without hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) maintenance in sustained clinically inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRESS trial is a multicentre, 33-week, open-label, three-arm, non-inferiority designed, randomised controlled trial. SLE patients with sustained clinically inactive disease who were maintained on low-dose GC plus HCQ therapy were screened and qualified patients were randomly assigned to three groups: drug-free group (both GC and HCQ withdrawal); HCQ group (discontinued GC but maintained HCQ); dual maintenance group (both GC and HCQ continued). The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing a relapse as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index flare index by 33 weeks. Two parallel non-inferiority analyses were performed (drug-free group vs dual maintenance group and HCQ group vs dual maintenance group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3 November 2016 to 13 August 2021, 333 participants complied with the protocol after randomisation were analysed. The relapse rates in the three groups were 26.1%, 11.2% and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with dual maintenance group, drug-free group failed to achieve non-inferiority significance (relapse rate difference 21.4%; 95% CI 12.3% to 30.5%; P<sub>non-inferiority</sub>=0.238), whereas HCQ group achieved non-inferiority (relapse rate difference 6.5%; 95% CI -0.5% to 13.5%; P<sub>non-inferiority</sub>=0.034). HCQ group also exhibited fewer relapses than drug-free group (p=0.006). Adverse events were similar among all three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GC withdrawal may be feasible in sustained clinically inactive SLE patients. HCQ maintenance can exert a protective role in preventing disease relapse after GC withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02842814.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-225826","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the relapse rate after glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal with or without hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) maintenance in sustained clinically inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: The PRESS trial is a multicentre, 33-week, open-label, three-arm, non-inferiority designed, randomised controlled trial. SLE patients with sustained clinically inactive disease who were maintained on low-dose GC plus HCQ therapy were screened and qualified patients were randomly assigned to three groups: drug-free group (both GC and HCQ withdrawal); HCQ group (discontinued GC but maintained HCQ); dual maintenance group (both GC and HCQ continued). The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing a relapse as defined by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index flare index by 33 weeks. Two parallel non-inferiority analyses were performed (drug-free group vs dual maintenance group and HCQ group vs dual maintenance group).

Results: From 3 November 2016 to 13 August 2021, 333 participants complied with the protocol after randomisation were analysed. The relapse rates in the three groups were 26.1%, 11.2% and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with dual maintenance group, drug-free group failed to achieve non-inferiority significance (relapse rate difference 21.4%; 95% CI 12.3% to 30.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.238), whereas HCQ group achieved non-inferiority (relapse rate difference 6.5%; 95% CI -0.5% to 13.5%; Pnon-inferiority=0.034). HCQ group also exhibited fewer relapses than drug-free group (p=0.006). Adverse events were similar among all three groups.

Conclusions: GC withdrawal may be feasible in sustained clinically inactive SLE patients. HCQ maintenance can exert a protective role in preventing disease relapse after GC withdrawal.

Trial registration number: NCT02842814.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
停用糖皮质激素后稳定期系统性红斑狼疮患者复发风险的评估与预测(PRESS):一项在中国开展的开放标签、多中心、非劣效性随机对照研究。
研究目的探讨临床症状持续不活跃的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者停用糖皮质激素(GC)并维持或不维持羟氯喹(HCQ)治疗后的复发率:PRESS试验是一项多中心、为期33周、开放标签、三臂、非劣效设计的随机对照试验。试验筛选了临床症状持续不明显、接受小剂量GC加HCQ治疗的系统性红斑狼疮患者,并将合格患者随机分配到三组:无药组(停用GC和HCQ);HCQ组(停用GC但继续使用HCQ);双重维持组(继续使用GC和HCQ)。主要终点是比较在33周前出现雌激素在红斑狼疮中的安全性国家评估-系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数复发指数所定义的复发患者比例。进行了两项平行非劣效性分析(无药组与双重维持组、HCQ组与双重维持组):从2016年11月3日至2021年8月13日,对随机分组后符合方案的333名参与者进行了分析。三组的复发率分别为 26.1%、11.2% 和 4.7%。与双重维持组相比,无药组未能达到非劣效性(复发率差异为21.4%;95% CI为12.3%至30.5%;Pnon-inferiority=0.238),而HCQ组达到了非劣效性(复发率差异为6.5%;95% CI为-0.5%至13.5%;Pnon-inferiority=0.034)。HCQ组的复发率也低于无药组(P=0.006)。三组的不良反应相似:结论:对于持续临床不活跃的系统性红斑狼疮患者来说,停用 GC 是可行的。试验注册号:NCT02842814:试验注册号:NCT02842814。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
期刊最新文献
Psoriatic arthritis phenotype clusters and their association with treatment response: a real-world longitudinal cohort study from the psoriatic arthritis research consortium. Acod1-mediated inhibition of aerobic glycolysis suppresses osteoclast differentiation and attenuates bone erosion in arthritis. Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials. Early identification of rheumatoid arthritis: does it induce treatment-related cost savings? New WHO ACPA standard enables standardisation among anti-CCP2 assays, but not other ACPA assays using different antigens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1