Do patients receiving extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation need antibiotic prophylaxis? A systematic review and meta-analysis on 7,996 patients.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02796-z
Daniele Orso, Caterina Maria Fodale, Sara Fossati, Sergio Venturini, Federico Fonda, Francesco Cugini, Irene Comisso, Massimo Crapis, Luisa Cacciavillani, Tiziana Bove
{"title":"Do patients receiving extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation need antibiotic prophylaxis? A systematic review and meta-analysis on 7,996 patients.","authors":"Daniele Orso, Caterina Maria Fodale, Sara Fossati, Sergio Venturini, Federico Fonda, Francesco Cugini, Irene Comisso, Massimo Crapis, Luisa Cacciavillani, Tiziana Bove","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02796-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are particularly susceptible to infections: 42% experience sepsis and 26% develop a nosocomial infection (NI). Whether antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in reducing mortality and its effects on the rate of NIs is currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Can antibiotic prophylaxis decrease 30-day mortality for patients on ECMO? Can antibiotic prophylaxis prevent the occurrence of NIs in these patients?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL libraries from inception to June 12, 2024. Two researchers were involved in abstract screening and three researchers were involved in full text selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A pooled population of 7,996 patients is represented by 5 retrospective studies. Reported mortality ranges between 46 and 58% and the NIs rate is between 14 and 62%. Regarding 30-day mortality, the random-effects model (I<sup>2</sup> = 65%) indicates a non-statistically significant difference between the antibiotic prophylaxis group and the non-prophylaxis group (OR 0.76; 95%CI 0.37-1.59). For the NIs rate, a fixed-effect model (I<sup>2</sup> = 36%) shows an OR of 0.81 (95%CI 0.71-0.92) in favor of the antibiotic prophylaxis group, with a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 39.7 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to a very low degree of certainty, antibiotic prophylaxis appears to have no impact on the 30-day mortality rate of ECMO recipients. The risk of NIs seems to decrease with antibiotic prophylaxis, even though the NNT is high. Prospective high-quality studies that address these specific clinical questions are necessary.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2024, CRD42024567037.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02796-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are particularly susceptible to infections: 42% experience sepsis and 26% develop a nosocomial infection (NI). Whether antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in reducing mortality and its effects on the rate of NIs is currently unclear.

Research question: Can antibiotic prophylaxis decrease 30-day mortality for patients on ECMO? Can antibiotic prophylaxis prevent the occurrence of NIs in these patients?

Study design and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL libraries from inception to June 12, 2024. Two researchers were involved in abstract screening and three researchers were involved in full text selection.

Results: A pooled population of 7,996 patients is represented by 5 retrospective studies. Reported mortality ranges between 46 and 58% and the NIs rate is between 14 and 62%. Regarding 30-day mortality, the random-effects model (I2 = 65%) indicates a non-statistically significant difference between the antibiotic prophylaxis group and the non-prophylaxis group (OR 0.76; 95%CI 0.37-1.59). For the NIs rate, a fixed-effect model (I2 = 36%) shows an OR of 0.81 (95%CI 0.71-0.92) in favor of the antibiotic prophylaxis group, with a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 39.7 patients.

Conclusion: According to a very low degree of certainty, antibiotic prophylaxis appears to have no impact on the 30-day mortality rate of ECMO recipients. The risk of NIs seems to decrease with antibiotic prophylaxis, even though the NNT is high. Prospective high-quality studies that address these specific clinical questions are necessary.

Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2024, CRD42024567037.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受体外膜肺氧合的患者是否需要抗生素预防?对 7996 名患者的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)治疗的患者特别容易受到感染:42%的患者会出现败血症,26%的患者会出现院内感染(NI)。抗生素预防是否能有效降低死亡率及其对非医院感染率的影响目前尚不清楚:抗生素预防能否降低 ECMO 患者的 30 天死亡率?研究设计和方法:进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 6 月 12 日的 PubMed、Scopus 和 CINAHL 文库。两名研究人员参与了摘要筛选,三名研究人员参与了全文筛选:5项回顾性研究汇集了7996名患者。报告的死亡率介于 46% 和 58% 之间,NIs 率介于 14% 和 62% 之间。关于 30 天死亡率,随机效应模型(I2 = 65%)显示抗生素预防组和非预防组之间的差异无统计学意义(OR 0.76;95%CI 0.37-1.59)。在NIs率方面,固定效应模型(I2 = 36%)显示抗生素预防组的OR值为0.81(95%CI 0.71-0.92),需要治疗的患者人数(NNT)为39.7人:结论:根据极低的确定性,抗生素预防似乎对 ECMO 患者的 30 天死亡率没有影响。尽管 NNT 很高,但抗生素预防似乎会降低 NIs 风险。有必要针对这些具体的临床问题开展高质量的前瞻性研究:临床试验注册:PROSPERO:国际系统综述前瞻性注册,2024,CRD42024567037。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating virtual reality anatomy training for novice anesthesiologists in performing ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks: a pilot study. Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine on the quality of recovery in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Effect of the modified NUTRIC score in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to intensive care units. Inhibitory effect of low-dose esketamine on cough induced by sufentanil during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative impact on mental health status: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Anesthetic anaphylactic shock in an emergency cesarean section: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1