Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05162-0
Ákos Mikolicz, Botond Simon, Aida Roudgari, Arvin Shahbazi, János Vág
{"title":"Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study.","authors":"Ákos Mikolicz, Botond Simon, Aida Roudgari, Arvin Shahbazi, János Vág","doi":"10.1186/s12903-024-05162-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to validate a machine learning algorithm previously developed in a training population on a different randomly chosen population (i.e., test set). The discrimination potential of the palatal intraoral scan-based geometric and superimposition methods was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 23 participants (16 females and seven males) from different countries underwent palatal scans using the Emerald intraoral scanner. Geometric-based identification involved measuring the height, width, and depth of the palatal vault in each scan. These parameters were then input into Fisher's linear discriminant equations with coefficients determined previously on a training set. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For the superimposition method, scan repeatability was compared to between-subjects differences, calculating mean absolute differences (MAD) between aligned scans. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the effects of sex, longitude, and latitude of country of origin on concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The geometric-based method achieved 91.2% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity, consistent with the results from the training set, showing no significant difference. Latitude and longitude did not significantly affect geometric-based matches. In the superimposition method, the between-subjects MAD range (1.068-0.214 mm) and the repeatability range (0.011-0.093 mm) did not overlap. MAD was minimally affected by longitude and not influenced by latitude. The sex determination function recognized females over males with 69.0% sensitivity, similar to the training set. However, the specificity (62.5%) decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment of geometric and superimposition discrimination has unequivocally demonstrated its robust reliability, remaining impervious to population. In contrast, the distinction between sexes carries only moderate reliability. The significant correlation observed among longitude, latitude, and palatal height suggests the feasibility of a comprehensive large-scale study to determine one's country of origin.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Portable intraoral scanners can aid forensic investigations as adjunct identification methods by applying the proposed discriminant function to palatal geometry without population restrictions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The Clinicatrial.gov registration number is NCT05349942 (27/04/2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05162-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to validate a machine learning algorithm previously developed in a training population on a different randomly chosen population (i.e., test set). The discrimination potential of the palatal intraoral scan-based geometric and superimposition methods was evaluated.

Methods: A total of 23 participants (16 females and seven males) from different countries underwent palatal scans using the Emerald intraoral scanner. Geometric-based identification involved measuring the height, width, and depth of the palatal vault in each scan. These parameters were then input into Fisher's linear discriminant equations with coefficients determined previously on a training set. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For the superimposition method, scan repeatability was compared to between-subjects differences, calculating mean absolute differences (MAD) between aligned scans. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the effects of sex, longitude, and latitude of country of origin on concordance.

Results: The geometric-based method achieved 91.2% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity, consistent with the results from the training set, showing no significant difference. Latitude and longitude did not significantly affect geometric-based matches. In the superimposition method, the between-subjects MAD range (1.068-0.214 mm) and the repeatability range (0.011-0.093 mm) did not overlap. MAD was minimally affected by longitude and not influenced by latitude. The sex determination function recognized females over males with 69.0% sensitivity, similar to the training set. However, the specificity (62.5%) decreased.

Conclusions: The assessment of geometric and superimposition discrimination has unequivocally demonstrated its robust reliability, remaining impervious to population. In contrast, the distinction between sexes carries only moderate reliability. The significant correlation observed among longitude, latitude, and palatal height suggests the feasibility of a comprehensive large-scale study to determine one's country of origin.

Clinical significance: Portable intraoral scanners can aid forensic investigations as adjunct identification methods by applying the proposed discriminant function to palatal geometry without population restrictions.

Trial registration: The Clinicatrial.gov registration number is NCT05349942 (27/04/2022).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过数字腭部扫描进行人体识别:一项机器学习验证试验研究。
研究背景本研究的目的是在随机选择的不同人群(即测试集)上验证之前在训练人群中开发的机器学习算法。评估基于口内扫描的腭部几何和叠加方法的辨别潜力:来自不同国家的 23 名参与者(16 名女性和 7 名男性)使用 Emerald 口内扫描仪进行了腭部扫描。基于几何的识别包括测量每次扫描中腭穹的高度、宽度和深度。然后将这些参数输入费雪线性判别方程,其系数是之前在训练集上确定的。计算灵敏度和特异性。对于叠加法,扫描重复性与受试者之间的差异进行比较,计算对齐扫描之间的平均绝对差异(MAD)。多元线性回归分析确定了性别、原籍国经度和纬度对一致性的影响:结果:基于几何的方法达到了 91.2% 的灵敏度和 97.1% 的特异性,与训练集的结果一致,无显著差异。纬度和经度对基于几何的匹配没有明显影响。在叠加法中,受试者之间的 MAD 范围(1.068-0.214 毫米)和重复性范围(0.011-0.093 毫米)没有重叠。MAD 受经度的影响很小,不受纬度的影响。性别判定功能识别女性的灵敏度为 69.0%,与训练集相似。但特异性(62.5%)有所下降:结论:对几何和叠加辨别力的评估明确显示了其强大的可靠性,不受人群影响。与此相反,性别差异仅具有中等程度的可靠性。在经度、纬度和腭高之间观察到的明显相关性表明,通过全面的大规模研究来确定一个人的原籍国是可行的:临床意义:便携式口内扫描仪可将提出的判别函数应用于腭部几何形状,不受人口限制,有助于法医调查,成为辅助识别方法:Clinicatrial.gov注册号为NCT05349942(2022年4月27日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The influence of parents' oral health literacy and behavior on oral health of preschool children aged 3-6 years- evidence from China. Challenges in oral health practice in Somalia: a call for regulatory strengthening and inclusion into primary healthcare services. CO2 laser treatment for scars after cleft lip surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparative assessment of vertical fracture resistance in endodontically treated roots with different obturating systems and techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Comparative effects of three mucoadhesive gels containing lidocaine, zinc acetate, and tannic acid on the gag reflex of dental patients: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1