Amount, type and storage of medicines in households - A survey for medicine users.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1111/bcpt.14104
Mella Louhisalmi, Piia Lavikainen, Kari Linden, Janne Martikainen, Johanna Timonen
{"title":"Amount, type and storage of medicines in households - A survey for medicine users.","authors":"Mella Louhisalmi, Piia Lavikainen, Kari Linden, Janne Martikainen, Johanna Timonen","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.14104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With increasing medicine use, more medicines are being stored at home, yet the understanding of household medicines remains limited. This study aimed to assess the amount, type and storage practices of medicines in households. It also explored the reasons for unnecessary or expired medicines, as well as the factors associated with the presence of expired medicines in a household. The online survey was conducted among loyal customers of University Pharmacy in June 2023 (n = 5004). The data were analysed for frequencies and percentages, and binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between background factors and expired medicines in households. On average, one household had 13.9 active, 2.8 unnecessary and 2.2 expired medicine packs. Medicines were typically stored in the kitchen (67.0%) and in cabinets (58.7%), and 40% were to be stored safely. The main reasons for unnecessary or expired medicines were improved health (39.2%), medication changes (31.9%) and oversized packs (28.0%). Households returning medicines biennially (odds ratio (OR): 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-3.82) and those with many active medicines (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.79-2.54) had expired medicines more often. The study showed that households had many medicines, highlighting the need for better storage and optimized packaging to improve safety, reduce waste and enhance rational pharmacotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.14104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing medicine use, more medicines are being stored at home, yet the understanding of household medicines remains limited. This study aimed to assess the amount, type and storage practices of medicines in households. It also explored the reasons for unnecessary or expired medicines, as well as the factors associated with the presence of expired medicines in a household. The online survey was conducted among loyal customers of University Pharmacy in June 2023 (n = 5004). The data were analysed for frequencies and percentages, and binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between background factors and expired medicines in households. On average, one household had 13.9 active, 2.8 unnecessary and 2.2 expired medicine packs. Medicines were typically stored in the kitchen (67.0%) and in cabinets (58.7%), and 40% were to be stored safely. The main reasons for unnecessary or expired medicines were improved health (39.2%), medication changes (31.9%) and oversized packs (28.0%). Households returning medicines biennially (odds ratio (OR): 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-3.82) and those with many active medicines (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.79-2.54) had expired medicines more often. The study showed that households had many medicines, highlighting the need for better storage and optimized packaging to improve safety, reduce waste and enhance rational pharmacotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭药品的数量、种类和储存--针对药品使用者的调查。
随着药品使用量的增加,越来越多的药品被储存在家中,但人们对家庭药品的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在评估家庭中药品的数量、类型和储存方式。它还探讨了不必要的药品或过期药品的原因,以及家庭中存在过期药品的相关因素。在线调查于 2023 年 6 月在大学药房的忠实顾客中进行(n = 5004)。对数据进行了频率和百分比分析,并采用二元逻辑回归法研究了背景因素与家庭中过期药品之间的关联。一个家庭平均有 13.9 个有效药包、2.8 个不必要药包和 2.2 个过期药包。药品通常存放在厨房(67.0%)和橱柜(58.7%)中,40%的药品应安全存放。不必要或过期药品的主要原因是健康状况改善(39.2%)、换药(31.9%)和药包过大(28.0%)。每两年归还一次药品的家庭(几率比(OR):2.85;95% 置信区间(CI):2.13-3.82)和拥有许多有效药品的家庭(OR:2.14;95% 置信区间(CI):1.79-2.54)更经常出现药品过期的情况。研究结果表明,家庭中的药品数量较多,因此需要更好地储存和优化包装,以提高安全性、减少浪费并加强合理的药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
期刊最新文献
Diloxanide in amoebiasis management: Unravelling the mechanism of action and effectiveness. Long-term taurine supplementation regulates brain mitochondrial dynamics in mice. Syringin ameliorates dextran sulphate colitis via alteration oxidative stress, inflammation NF-κB signalling pathway and gut microbiota. Amount, type and storage of medicines in households - A survey for medicine users. sGC stimulator (BAY 41-8543) combined with PDE9 inhibitor (BAY 73-6691) reduces renal fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1