Essential strategic principles for planning and developing digitally enabled interventions in health and care settings.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11819-x
Kathrin Cresswell, Robin Williams
{"title":"Essential strategic principles for planning and developing digitally enabled interventions in health and care settings.","authors":"Kathrin Cresswell, Robin Williams","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11819-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health and care information technologies can improve service delivery, but unfortunately many fail to realise their potential. This is because tools fail to effectively integrate with user and organisational practices. We here draw on two decades and an extensive body of practical and theoretical experience of conducting formative evaluations in health service settings to extract seven essential principles for planning and developing digital tools. Firstly, it is important to determine if digitalisation is the right approach for the desired change and to view these tools as complex interventions needing careful planning. The development process should embrace varying levels of co-creation and adapt to different needs and contexts. Ensuring that tools integrate well with existing information infrastructures and striking a balance between being widely applicable and locally relevant is essential. Furthermore, planning for how these interventions will fit into broader health and care pathways is vital. By considering these factors, decision-makers can significantly improve the chances of successful implementation, adoption and scaling of health and care technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11819-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health and care information technologies can improve service delivery, but unfortunately many fail to realise their potential. This is because tools fail to effectively integrate with user and organisational practices. We here draw on two decades and an extensive body of practical and theoretical experience of conducting formative evaluations in health service settings to extract seven essential principles for planning and developing digital tools. Firstly, it is important to determine if digitalisation is the right approach for the desired change and to view these tools as complex interventions needing careful planning. The development process should embrace varying levels of co-creation and adapt to different needs and contexts. Ensuring that tools integrate well with existing information infrastructures and striking a balance between being widely applicable and locally relevant is essential. Furthermore, planning for how these interventions will fit into broader health and care pathways is vital. By considering these factors, decision-makers can significantly improve the chances of successful implementation, adoption and scaling of health and care technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规划和开发卫生与护理领域数字化干预措施的基本战略原则。
医疗保健信息技术可以改善服务的提供,但遗憾的是,许多信息技术未能发挥其潜力。这是因为工具未能有效地与用户和组织实践相结合。在此,我们借鉴二十年来在医疗服务环境中开展形成性评估的大量实践和理论经验,总结出规划和开发数字化工具的七项基本原则。首先,必须确定数字化是否是实现预期变革的正确方法,并将这些工具视为需要仔细规划的复杂干预措施。开发过程应包含不同程度的共同创造,并适应不同的需求和环境。确保这些工具与现有的信息基础设施很好地整合,并在广泛适用性和本地相关性之间取得平衡,这一点至关重要。此外,规划这些干预措施如何融入更广泛的健康和护理途径也至关重要。通过考虑这些因素,决策者可以大大提高成功实施、采用和推广卫生与护理技术的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Decarbonizing surgical care: a qualitative systematic review guided by the Congruence Model. Qualitative exploration of 3D printing in Swedish healthcare: perceived effects and barriers. A tailored intervention for the detection of patients with coronary heart disease and mental or cognitive comorbidities in the German primary care setting: qualitative evaluation of implementation success. Breaking barriers: a qualitative exploration of healthcare access for crack cocaine users in Limerick. Intention to use mobile text message reminders for medication adherence among hypertensive patients in North West Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1