Impact of structured checklist-based preoperative counseling versus standard counseling on postoperative patient-reported outcomes after elective surgery.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11916-x
Moh'd S Dawod, Mohammad N Alswerki, Ahmad Alelaumi, Moath G Shaqar, Farah M Al-Habashneh, Saif A Alshloul, Mustafa Burghol, Samer F Al-Rawashdah, Mohammad W Amir, Mahmoud H Alkhasawneh
{"title":"Impact of structured checklist-based preoperative counseling versus standard counseling on postoperative patient-reported outcomes after elective surgery.","authors":"Moh'd S Dawod, Mohammad N Alswerki, Ahmad Alelaumi, Moath G Shaqar, Farah M Al-Habashneh, Saif A Alshloul, Mustafa Burghol, Samer F Al-Rawashdah, Mohammad W Amir, Mahmoud H Alkhasawneh","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11916-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgery, even on an elective-basis, often induces significant stress in patients, characterized by preoperative anxiety and heightened stress levels due to anticipation of the unknown. However, the primary objective of preoperative counseling is to mitigate these concerns, particularly when delivered in a structured and comprehensive manner. While previous research has highlighted the beneficial impact of preoperative counseling on patient-reported outcomes, none have specifically explored the implementation of a structured checklist-based approach during counseling sessions. To bridge this gap in the literature, our study aims to investigate the effects of implementing a checklist-based structured counseling approach on patient-reported outcomes following elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study conducted over one year from January to December 2023, a total of 600 patients undergoing elective surgery across three specialties-orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and urology-were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: an intervention group consisting of 300 patients and a control group with an equal number of patients. The study evaluated three key outcomes-postoperative pain, anxiety, and satisfaction-at three specific time points following surgery: 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving structured checklist counseling showed significantly lower pain scores (24 h: 6.6 vs. 7.03, p = 0.041; 48 h: 5.62 vs. 6.55, p = 0.029; 72 h: 2.54 vs. 2.90, p = 0.035) and anxiety scores (24 h: 8.58 vs. 9.25, p = 0.039; 48 h: 7.50 vs. 8.45, p = 0.030; 72 h: 4.53 vs. 5.98, p = 0.031), as well as higher satisfaction scores (24 h: 5.99 vs. 5.06, p = 0.043; 48 h: 6.99 vs. 6.02, p = 0.033; 72 h: 9.10 vs. 8.20, p = 0.039) compared to controls. These improvements were consistently significant across all three surgical specialties studied (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The structured checklist-based counseling method proves to be effective and essential. This method is associated with reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels, along with increased patient satisfaction, when compared to the standard approach.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective non-randomized study, Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11916-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery, even on an elective-basis, often induces significant stress in patients, characterized by preoperative anxiety and heightened stress levels due to anticipation of the unknown. However, the primary objective of preoperative counseling is to mitigate these concerns, particularly when delivered in a structured and comprehensive manner. While previous research has highlighted the beneficial impact of preoperative counseling on patient-reported outcomes, none have specifically explored the implementation of a structured checklist-based approach during counseling sessions. To bridge this gap in the literature, our study aims to investigate the effects of implementing a checklist-based structured counseling approach on patient-reported outcomes following elective surgery.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study conducted over one year from January to December 2023, a total of 600 patients undergoing elective surgery across three specialties-orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and urology-were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: an intervention group consisting of 300 patients and a control group with an equal number of patients. The study evaluated three key outcomes-postoperative pain, anxiety, and satisfaction-at three specific time points following surgery: 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.

Results: Patients receiving structured checklist counseling showed significantly lower pain scores (24 h: 6.6 vs. 7.03, p = 0.041; 48 h: 5.62 vs. 6.55, p = 0.029; 72 h: 2.54 vs. 2.90, p = 0.035) and anxiety scores (24 h: 8.58 vs. 9.25, p = 0.039; 48 h: 7.50 vs. 8.45, p = 0.030; 72 h: 4.53 vs. 5.98, p = 0.031), as well as higher satisfaction scores (24 h: 5.99 vs. 5.06, p = 0.043; 48 h: 6.99 vs. 6.02, p = 0.033; 72 h: 9.10 vs. 8.20, p = 0.039) compared to controls. These improvements were consistently significant across all three surgical specialties studied (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The structured checklist-based counseling method proves to be effective and essential. This method is associated with reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels, along with increased patient satisfaction, when compared to the standard approach.

Level of evidence: Prospective non-randomized study, Level II.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于结构化核对表的术前咨询与标准咨询对择期手术后患者报告结果的影响。
导言:手术(即使是选择性手术)通常会给患者带来巨大的压力,其特点是术前焦虑和对未知情况的预期导致压力水平升高。然而,术前咨询的主要目的是减轻这些担忧,尤其是以结构化和全面的方式提供咨询时。虽然之前的研究强调了术前咨询对患者报告结果的有利影响,但没有任何研究专门探讨了在咨询过程中实施结构化核对表方法的问题。为了弥补这一文献空白,我们的研究旨在探讨实施基于核对表的结构化咨询方法对择期手术后患者报告结果的影响:在这项从 2023 年 1 月到 12 月为期一年的前瞻性队列研究中,共有 600 名接受择期手术的患者接受了检查,涉及三个专科--骨科手术、普外科和泌尿科。患者被分为两组:干预组由 300 名患者组成,对照组患者人数相同。研究评估了术后 24 小时、48 小时和 72 小时三个特定时间点的三个主要结果--术后疼痛、焦虑和满意度:结果:接受结构化核对表咨询的患者的疼痛评分(24 小时:6.6 vs. 7.03,p = 0.041;48 小时:5.62 vs. 6.55,p = 0.029;72 小时:2.54 vs. 2.90,p = 0.035)和焦虑评分(24 小时:8.58 vs. 9.25,p = 0.039;48 小时:7.50 vs. 8.45,p = 0.030;72 小时:4.53 vs. 5.98,p = 0.041)明显降低:4.53 vs. 5.98,p = 0.031),与对照组相比,满意度得分更高(24 小时:5.99 vs. 5.06,p = 0.043;48 小时:6.99 vs. 6.02,p = 0.033;72 小时:9.10 vs. 8.20,p = 0.039)。在所研究的三个外科专科中,这些改善都具有持续的显著性(p 结论:基于核对表的结构化咨询方法证明是有效和必要的。与标准方法相比,该方法可降低术后疼痛和焦虑水平,同时提高患者满意度:前瞻性非随机研究,II 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences of resident doctors in child and adolescent psychiatry with virtual reality-based simulation training: a qualitative study. Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies. Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Sichuan Province, China. How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1