The efficacy and safety of the prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF in radiotherapy with weekly concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13148-y
Huimin Chen, Yiming Ma, Dandan Wang, Hao Wu, Mingchuan Zhang, Yuanyuan Xu, Shuxia Cheng
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of the prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF in radiotherapy with weekly concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer.","authors":"Huimin Chen, Yiming Ma, Dandan Wang, Hao Wu, Mingchuan Zhang, Yuanyuan Xu, Shuxia Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13148-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during concurrent radiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2019 to November 2020, 180 patients with cervical cancer who required concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the following three groups at a ratio of 1:1:1: Group A (PEG-rhG-CSF), Group B (PEG-rhG-CSF + rhG-CSF) and the control group (rhG-CSF). Cisplatin or carboplatin was administered weekly. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), delay of radiotherapy, chemotherapy dose reduction, rate of PFS at 2 years and 3 years, and incidence of adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were randomly assigned to each group. Two patients in Group B withdrew from the trial for personal reasons. The incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly lower than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly greater than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN among the three groups (P = 0.771). The rate of platinum dose reduction in Group A (6.7%) and Group B (5.2%) was significantly lower than that in the Control group (30.0%) (P < 0.001). The delay rate of radiotherapy in Group A (10%) and Group B (13.8%) was obviously inferior to that in the Control group (31.7%) (P = 0.006). The 2-year PFS rates of Group A, Group B, and the Control group were 93.3%, 98.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.270). The 3-year PFS rates were 89.8%, 94.1%, and 84.9%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.178). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Group A and Group B, The prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF during conventional chemoradiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions when compared to Control group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900026309, registered 29 September 2019-prospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13148-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during concurrent radiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods: From September 2019 to November 2020, 180 patients with cervical cancer who required concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the following three groups at a ratio of 1:1:1: Group A (PEG-rhG-CSF), Group B (PEG-rhG-CSF + rhG-CSF) and the control group (rhG-CSF). Cisplatin or carboplatin was administered weekly. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), delay of radiotherapy, chemotherapy dose reduction, rate of PFS at 2 years and 3 years, and incidence of adverse reactions.

Results: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to each group. Two patients in Group B withdrew from the trial for personal reasons. The incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly lower than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly greater than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN among the three groups (P = 0.771). The rate of platinum dose reduction in Group A (6.7%) and Group B (5.2%) was significantly lower than that in the Control group (30.0%) (P < 0.001). The delay rate of radiotherapy in Group A (10%) and Group B (13.8%) was obviously inferior to that in the Control group (31.7%) (P = 0.006). The 2-year PFS rates of Group A, Group B, and the Control group were 93.3%, 98.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.270). The 3-year PFS rates were 89.8%, 94.1%, and 84.9%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.178). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in any of the patients.

Conclusion: In Group A and Group B, The prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF during conventional chemoradiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions when compared to Control group.

Trial registration: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900026309, registered 29 September 2019-prospectively registered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在宫颈癌放疗中预防性应用 PEG-rhG-CSF 并同时进行每周化疗的有效性和安全性。
目的评估聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在宫颈癌患者同期放化疗期间预防中性粒细胞减少症的有效性和安全性:2019年9月至2020年11月,180名需要同期放化疗(CCRT)的宫颈癌患者被纳入本研究。患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分为以下三组:A 组(PEG-rhG-CSF)、B 组(PEG-rhG-CSF + rhG-CSF)和对照组(rhG-CSF)。顺铂或卡铂每周给药一次。主要终点是3/4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率。次要终点是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)发生率、放疗延迟、化疗剂量减少、2年和3年的PFS率以及不良反应发生率:60名患者被随机分配到各组。结果:每组随机分配了 60 名患者,其中 B 组有两名患者因个人原因退出试验。对照组中1/2级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率明显低于A组和B组(P 结论:A组和B组的中性粒细胞减少症发生率明显低于A组和B组:与对照组相比,A组和B组宫颈癌患者在常规化放疗联合周化疗期间预防性应用PEG-rhG-CSF可降低3/4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率,且不会增加不良反应的发生率。试验注册:chictr.org.cn,ChiCTR1900026309,注册时间:2019年9月29日-前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Combined effects of nutrition, inflammatory status, and sleep quality on mortality in cancer survivors. METTL2B m3C RNA transferase: oncogenic role in ovarian cancer progression via regulation of the mTOR/AKT pathway and its link to the tumor immune microenvironment. 18F-FDG PET/CT-based habitat radiomics combining stacking ensemble learning for predicting prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study. A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy. Periprostatic fat magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics nomogram for predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1