Using a policy learning lens to understand health financing policy outcomes: the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015488
Joël Arthur Kiendrébéogo, Manuela De Allegri, Wim Van Damme, Bruno Meessen
{"title":"Using a policy learning lens to understand health financing policy outcomes: the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso.","authors":"Joël Arthur Kiendrébéogo, Manuela De Allegri, Wim Van Damme, Bruno Meessen","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) through an effective health financing system is a challenge for many low-income countries. Learning is key to success due to many uncertainties and unknowns. Using the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso, our study seeks to understand how policy learning can shape policy processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative case study design and Dunlop and Radaelli's conceptualisation of policy learning to identify which modes of learning did or did not occur, what helped or hindered them and the resulting policy outcomes. Dunlop and Radaelli frame policy learning as epistemic, reflexive, negotiative or hierarchical. We collected data through documentary review and in-depth individual interviews with 21 key informants. We analysed the data manually using pattern-matching techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The introduction of strategic health purchasing in Burkina Faso was initially seen as an opportunity to reduce the fragmentation of the health financing system by coupling a performance-based financing scheme and a user fee exemption policy. However, this has faltered, and our findings suggest that an inability to harness all modes of learning has led to blockages. Indeed, while reflective learning was present, epistemic, hierarchical and learning through bargaining were absent, preventing national policy actors from defending their own policy or scheme from reaching compromises. But thanks to facilitating processes led by a well-resourced organisation and contextual elements that encouraged the emergence of more pluralistic modes of learning, some progress was achieved in operationalising strategic health purchasing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some modes of learning seem to be overlooked in countries' efforts to achieve UHC. Facilitation techniques and initiatives that encourage the use of all modes of learning, while supporting countries to take full ownership and responsibility for consolidating their own learning health systems, should be promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) through an effective health financing system is a challenge for many low-income countries. Learning is key to success due to many uncertainties and unknowns. Using the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso, our study seeks to understand how policy learning can shape policy processes and outcomes.

Methods: We used a qualitative case study design and Dunlop and Radaelli's conceptualisation of policy learning to identify which modes of learning did or did not occur, what helped or hindered them and the resulting policy outcomes. Dunlop and Radaelli frame policy learning as epistemic, reflexive, negotiative or hierarchical. We collected data through documentary review and in-depth individual interviews with 21 key informants. We analysed the data manually using pattern-matching techniques.

Results: The introduction of strategic health purchasing in Burkina Faso was initially seen as an opportunity to reduce the fragmentation of the health financing system by coupling a performance-based financing scheme and a user fee exemption policy. However, this has faltered, and our findings suggest that an inability to harness all modes of learning has led to blockages. Indeed, while reflective learning was present, epistemic, hierarchical and learning through bargaining were absent, preventing national policy actors from defending their own policy or scheme from reaching compromises. But thanks to facilitating processes led by a well-resourced organisation and contextual elements that encouraged the emergence of more pluralistic modes of learning, some progress was achieved in operationalising strategic health purchasing.

Conclusions: Some modes of learning seem to be overlooked in countries' efforts to achieve UHC. Facilitation techniques and initiatives that encourage the use of all modes of learning, while supporting countries to take full ownership and responsibility for consolidating their own learning health systems, should be promoted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从政策学习的角度理解卫生筹资政策成果:布基纳法索将战略性卫生采购转化为政策和实践的案例。
导言:通过有效的医疗筹资系统实现全民医保(UHC)是许多低收入国家面临的挑战。由于存在许多不确定性和未知因素,学习是成功的关键。通过布基纳法索将战略性医疗采购转化为政策和实践的案例,我们的研究试图了解政策学习如何影响政策进程和结果:我们采用了定性案例研究设计以及 Dunlop 和 Radaelli 的政策学习概念,以确定哪些学习模式发生了或没有发生,哪些对其有帮助或有阻碍,以及由此产生的政策结果。邓洛普和拉达利将政策学习划分为认识式、反思式、协商式或等级式。我们通过文件审查和对 21 位关键信息提供者的深入访谈收集数据。我们使用模式匹配技术对数据进行了人工分析:布基纳法索引入战略性医疗采购的初衷是通过将基于绩效的融资计划与免收使用费政策结合起来,减少医疗融资系统的分散性。然而,这并没有成功,我们的研究结果表明,无法利用所有学习模式导致了阻碍。事实上,虽然存在反思性学习,但缺乏认识论学习、等级学习和通过讨价还价进行的学习,这阻碍了国家政策参与者为自己的政策或计划辩护,从而无法达成妥协。但是,由于一个资源充足的组织所领导的促进过程,以及鼓励出现更多元化学习模式的环境因素,在实施战略性医疗采购方面取得了一些进展:在各国努力实现全民医保的过程中,一些学习模式似乎被忽视了。应推广鼓励使用所有学习模式的促进技术和举措,同时支持各国充分发挥自主权,承担起巩固本国学习型卫生系统的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Caught between violence: Mpox virus and the perils of neglect in Africa. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination using potential next-generation influenza vaccines in Thailand: a modelling study. Probing the past: historical case study analysis to inform more just and sustainable global health partnerships in education. Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research. Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1